THREAD: Could the current energy crisis be even worse than the 1970s oil price shock? Given the legendary status of that event it might seem like a preposterous question. But we’ve crunched the numbers on this and they’re not pretty…
Before we get to the data it’s perhaps worth splitting up the 1970s comparison into two parts: first, the financial impact on households.
Second, the impact on the wider economy: shutdowns, three days weeks and so on. Let’s deal with household finances first.
It so happens the UK has an excellent set of statistics on what the “average” household spends its money on each year. £588 a week Everything from restaurants, culture, food/drink, mortgage payments, council tax, income tax and, of course energy bills: a quick guided tour here:
Now that energy bill slice may not look big but bear in mind if it goes up to £2k this spring that's up from £25 a week to £38 a week.
If, as is plausible given where wholesale prices are, the formula puts it at £2.4k in autumn, that's £46.
If u assume other spending rises in line with nominal GDP (I've used OBR forecasts) then that £38 a week would equate to 5.6% of total spending.
That £46 (in the event of the price cap going all the way to £2.4k) would be 6.8% of total spending.
How high is that vs history?
Happily we have a LONG run of data on this. Not all of it is on the @ONS website but I've managed to get hold of family spending numbers going back to 1970.
Look at spending on domestic energy up til recently: rises quite high in the 70s and 80s. Drops lower in the 90s/2000s
Now let's add on the numbers if the price cap goes up to £2,000. The proportion of household spending going on heat/power is suddenly up to the highest since the late 1980s, 1987 to be precise.
If the price cap were to rise to £2.4k later this year then the proportion UK households spend on heat and power would be the highest ON RECORD. Higher even than the 1970s. So it's not preposterous to compare this: in many ways the domestic impact could be worse than the 70s
How "unprecedented" are these numbers? Not 100% sure. In general energy prices came down quite a lot in the 1950s and 1960s.
Then again, I've seen some papers suggesting that even in the 1930s the avg amount people paid for energy was well below this: jstor.org/stable/23015065
Of course, there's no such thing as an "average" household, and the impact will be far greater on low income households for whom energy already constituted a bigger share. So while the top tenth may see bills up from c.3% of total to 4%, for the bottom 10% it's up to 13% or more
Now, as we established above, the 70s crisis wasn't just about domestic bills. In many senses it was about the nature of industry: factories were shuttered, power was rationed, 3 day week etc. Could that happen again?
This seems less likely, but not for an altogether encouraging reason. The key is this chart. Back in the 60s and 70s, more than 40% of people worked in the energy/manufacturing sectors. They were at the core of the economy so everyone NOTICED if they were curtailed...
Roll on to the 2000s and barely a tenth of people work in the kinds of sectors which have high energy usage and might therefore be curtailed. Even if there are shutdowns they're unlikely to have the same cultural impact as back in the 1970s
This doesn't mean there won't be an industrial impact. But in the same way as we've offshored our manufacturing the industrial energy impact is offshored too.
Factories in China are already shutting down (part Covid, part energy).
Which portends more supply chain problems ahead
Consider that this is all coming at the same time as payroll taxes and interest rates are going up. And the @bankofengland is raising interest rates too. All told, discretionary items accounting for nearly 40% of household spending (the red bits) are on the way up. Big squeeze.
Full news story: families facing the biggest energy squeeze on record as prices begin to bite news.sky.com/story/energy-c…
Here, in video form, is my analysis on the impact higher energy prices could have on household bills in the coming months. In short: this could be an even worse squeeze than following the famous energy crises in 70s/80s. Produced by @aoifeyourell
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵
What does a trade war look like?
Much of what you've heard about tariffs is prob soundbites from politicians & economists.
But what does a trade war actually FEEL like at ground level?
We've spent the past year working on a film on just that.
Here's some highlights
👇
Best place to start is with this👇
It may look like a lump of metal but don't be fooled.
This is a die: a sort of mould used to shape plastics. Looks simple but it's super-engineered - designed to withstand enormous pressure.
Without dies like this there's no manufacturing...
Dies and moulds are the unsung champions in modern mass production.
One of the single most impressive things about Tesla's manufacturing processes is what @elonmusk calls the Gigapress: a massive machine that shapes metal. And at the heart of the gigapress are enormous dies.
The PM keeps repeating the figure £16bn in relation to the OBR's latest forecasts - giving the impression that this would have left a big hole in the public finances. What he fails to acknowledge is that that this is LITERALLY ONLY ONE PART OF THE STORY.
Here's why...
Yes: the OBR downgraded the fiscal numbers by £16bn (actually £15.6bn) due to weaker productivity (red bar below).
But it also simultaneously UPGRADED them by a whopping £32bn (blue bars).
This chart from @TheIFS shows it pretty clearly👇
Banging on about the £16bn productivity - as the PM did repeatedly in his press conference today - without also mentioning the £14bn inflation UPGRADE and the £17bn of other UPGRADES seems... pretty misleading to me.
It's simply NOT the full picture...
NEW
UK abolishes its "de minimis" rules which exclude cheap imports below £135 from paying tariffs.
A massive deal for the fast fashion/cheap Chinese imports sector: this is the so-called loophole used to great effect by SHEIN and Temu.
Should also bring in some tariff revenue
For more background on this, here's our investigation from earlier this year on de minimis and what it means in practice - including a glimpse inside the planes carrying these imports into the UK 👇
The flip side to this policy is:
a) stuff (yes, a lot of it is tat but even so) will get more expensive
b) it primarily hits lower income households
c) as you'll see from my thread, de minimis was a lifesaver for small regional airports. Its demise is v bad news for them...
NEW
"Data center alley" in North Virginia.
Home to the biggest cluster of server centres in the world.
Here, more than anywhere else, is the global epicentre of AI.
It's where the recent AWS outage happened.
And we've secured rare access INSIDE one of the data centres...
The inside of one of the centres, run by Digital Realty, one of the biggest datacenter companies in the world.
Extremely high security. Long, long corridors, flanked by rooms in which those servers are operating.
This is the very heart of the biggest economic story right now
And inside one of those rooms, here is one of the supercomputers powering the AI boom. This Nvidia DGX H100 is the physical infrastructure making AI a reality.
🚨EXCLUSIVE
The firm at the heart of Britain's critical minerals strategy has ditched plans for a rare earths refinery in the UK, and will build it in the US instead.
It's a serious blow to the Chancellor and her plans for "securonomics" ahead of next month's Budget👇
Not long ago Pensana was being hailed as key to Britain's industrial future.
It had plans to ship rare earth ores to the UK and refine them in a plant just outside Hull, creating 126 jobs and bringing in hundreds of millions of pounds of investment...
Its Saltend site was where the then Biz sec Kwasi Kwarteng launched the govt's official critical minerals strategy a few years ago, saying: "This incredible facility will be the only of its kind in Europe and will help secure the resilience of Britain's supplies into the future"
📽️Is Britain REALLY facing a 1970s-style fiscal crisis?
Why are investors so freaked out about UK debt?
Is this REALLY worse than under Liz Truss?
Who's to blame? Rachel Reeves? The Bank of England?
And would a bit of productivity really solve everything?
📈 Your 6 min primer👇
OK, so let's break it down.
Start with the chart everyone (well, everyone in Whitehall) is talking about.
The 30yr UK government bond yield. Up to the highest level since 1998. And it's still rising.
Does this mean the UK is facing a fiscal crisis? Let's look at the evidence
First let's compare the UK to other G7 countries.
There's two ways to do this.
First, look at absolute levels👇
And it looks pretty awkward for the UK.
Pre-mini Budget we were middle of the pack. That changed post-Truss. And now, under Labour, the UK is even more of an outlier.