THREAD: Could the current energy crisis be even worse than the 1970s oil price shock? Given the legendary status of that event it might seem like a preposterous question. But we’ve crunched the numbers on this and they’re not pretty…
Before we get to the data it’s perhaps worth splitting up the 1970s comparison into two parts: first, the financial impact on households.
Second, the impact on the wider economy: shutdowns, three days weeks and so on. Let’s deal with household finances first.
It so happens the UK has an excellent set of statistics on what the “average” household spends its money on each year. £588 a week Everything from restaurants, culture, food/drink, mortgage payments, council tax, income tax and, of course energy bills: a quick guided tour here:
Now that energy bill slice may not look big but bear in mind if it goes up to £2k this spring that's up from £25 a week to £38 a week.
If, as is plausible given where wholesale prices are, the formula puts it at £2.4k in autumn, that's £46.
If u assume other spending rises in line with nominal GDP (I've used OBR forecasts) then that £38 a week would equate to 5.6% of total spending.
That £46 (in the event of the price cap going all the way to £2.4k) would be 6.8% of total spending.
How high is that vs history?
Happily we have a LONG run of data on this. Not all of it is on the @ONS website but I've managed to get hold of family spending numbers going back to 1970.
Look at spending on domestic energy up til recently: rises quite high in the 70s and 80s. Drops lower in the 90s/2000s
Now let's add on the numbers if the price cap goes up to £2,000. The proportion of household spending going on heat/power is suddenly up to the highest since the late 1980s, 1987 to be precise.
If the price cap were to rise to £2.4k later this year then the proportion UK households spend on heat and power would be the highest ON RECORD. Higher even than the 1970s. So it's not preposterous to compare this: in many ways the domestic impact could be worse than the 70s
How "unprecedented" are these numbers? Not 100% sure. In general energy prices came down quite a lot in the 1950s and 1960s.
Then again, I've seen some papers suggesting that even in the 1930s the avg amount people paid for energy was well below this: jstor.org/stable/23015065
Of course, there's no such thing as an "average" household, and the impact will be far greater on low income households for whom energy already constituted a bigger share. So while the top tenth may see bills up from c.3% of total to 4%, for the bottom 10% it's up to 13% or more
Now, as we established above, the 70s crisis wasn't just about domestic bills. In many senses it was about the nature of industry: factories were shuttered, power was rationed, 3 day week etc. Could that happen again?
This seems less likely, but not for an altogether encouraging reason. The key is this chart. Back in the 60s and 70s, more than 40% of people worked in the energy/manufacturing sectors. They were at the core of the economy so everyone NOTICED if they were curtailed...
Roll on to the 2000s and barely a tenth of people work in the kinds of sectors which have high energy usage and might therefore be curtailed. Even if there are shutdowns they're unlikely to have the same cultural impact as back in the 1970s
This doesn't mean there won't be an industrial impact. But in the same way as we've offshored our manufacturing the industrial energy impact is offshored too.
Factories in China are already shutting down (part Covid, part energy).
Which portends more supply chain problems ahead
Consider that this is all coming at the same time as payroll taxes and interest rates are going up. And the @bankofengland is raising interest rates too. All told, discretionary items accounting for nearly 40% of household spending (the red bits) are on the way up. Big squeeze.
Full news story: families facing the biggest energy squeeze on record as prices begin to bite news.sky.com/story/energy-c…
Here, in video form, is my analysis on the impact higher energy prices could have on household bills in the coming months. In short: this could be an even worse squeeze than following the famous energy crises in 70s/80s. Produced by @aoifeyourell
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵Why, barely 24 hours after the Spending Review, is everyone already going on about tax rises?
Are they REALLY coming?
Or is this an "incoherent argument", as one leading minister calls it?
Well here's a thread explaining what's really going on here.
Bear with me...
First things first.
Key thing to remember is that the main job of HMT is to generate enough money, mostly via taxes (left hand bar here), to finance all its spending (right hand bar).
If that left hand bar isn't high enough, we have to borrow to fill the gap.
That's the deficit!
This week's Spending Review was about the right hand column, obvs. But not ALL of the column.
Actually more than half of govt spending is on stuff that WASN'T covered by the spending review - on benefits, debt interest, pensions etc. It's called "annually managed expenditure"
🧵
You may recall a spate of stories a few years ago about appalling working conditions & abysmally low pay in Leicester's clothes factories.
The hope was those stories would shame businesses into improving working conditions.
But here's what ACTUALLY happened next...
👇
Instead of staying in Leicester, most brands abandoned it & shifted production to N Africa & S Asia.
Today Britain's biggest centre of textile & apparel manufacture is battling the threat of extinction.
It's a mostly untold economic story we've spent recent months documenting
Once upon a time Leicester was the beating heart of UK clothes manufacturing.
The city was dotted with factories making clothes for big name brands.
Now, according to one estimate, the number of clothes factories has dropped from 1500 in 2017 to under 100 this year. A 95% fall.
How big a deal is the new trade agreement unveiled between the US and the UK? Here are some initial thoughts.
Start with this: this is total UK exports to the US over the past 5yrs: £273bn. Right now most of this will face a 10% tariff. Some things (eg cars) face 25% extra
Let's break down that total. The biggest chunk is cars. Just under £30bn. That's covered under the agreement. So too are steel/aluminium exports. Much smaller at £2.7bn...
These sectors will benefit from special deals (though much of the detail still remains vague).
Rolls Royce will apparently get tariff free access for its jet engines. That mostly helps Boeing, but also Rolls Royce. Jet engines comprise a surprisingly large chunk of UK exports to the US, about £17.3bn. So let's shade that red too...
🚨
The Chinese owners of British Steel say they are now considering shutting their blast furnaces and end steelmaking at Scunthorpe in early June - only a few months away.
It would mean an end of virgin steelmaking in the country that invented it during the industrial revolution
British Steel say the main question now is timing: whether the operations will close in June, in September or later.
It says tariffs are one of the reasons the blast furnaces are "no longer financially sustainable".
Press release 👇
The news means @jreynoldsMP faces two interlocking crises in the coming months: 1. The imposition of US tariffs on an ever growing segment of British exports 2. The end of virgin steelmaking (the UK would be the first G7 country to face this watershed moment).
This is big stuff
Donald Trump just announced 25% tariffs on anyone importing oil from Venezuela.
This is odd.
Because the country importing the most crude from Venezuela is... the US.
Capital Economics chart of Ven oil exports by Capital Economics via @rbrtrmstrng
But it raises a bigger point
🧵
Why does the US import so much oil from Venezuela?
Mainly for the same reason it imports so much oil from Canada.
And no it's not just because they're close.
It's because most US refineries are set up to refine the kind of oil they have in Venezuela and Canada.
To understand this it helps to recall that crude oil is actually a broad term. There are LOTS of different varieties of crude - a function of the geology of where the oil formed and the organic ingredients that went into it millions of years ago.
It's called "crude" for a reason
🚨
Here's a thread about ALUMINIUM.
Why this commonplace metal is actually pretty extraordinary.
How the process of making it is a modern miracle...
... which also teaches you some profound lessons about the trade war being waged by Donald Trump. And why it might be doomed.
🧵
Aluminium is totally amazing.
It's strong but also very light, as metals go.
Essentially rust proof, highly electrically conductive. It is one of the foundations of modern civilisation.
No aluminium: no planes, no electricity grids.
A very different world.
Yet, commonplace as it is today, up until the 19th century no one had even set eyes on aluminium. Unlike most other major metals we didn't work out how to refine it until surprisingly recently.
The upshot is it used to be VERY precious. More than gold!