Zoe Tillman Profile picture
Jan 19, 2022 8 tweets 5 min read Read on X
New: The Archives intends to turn over a tranche of Trump's White House records to the Jan. 6 committee tomorrow at 6pm, per DOJ letter. These docs weren't covered by the DC Circuit's admin stay, and SCOTUS hasn't acted on Trump's emergency request yet s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2118…
What's up with the fourth tranche? It's approx. 551 pages, and Trump claimed exec privilege over *six pages*. DOJ says two pages are similar enough to the prev. sets of contested docs to be covered by an earlier stay, so it's four pages he doesn't want produced
That's in addition to 100s of pages of contested docs that were the subject of earlier rounds in court:
- 39 pages from tranche 1 (there were also 7 pages later withdrawn as nonresponsive)
- 724 pages from tranches 2 and 3
s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2115…
(redid this tweet with more info)
A clarification that will probably only matter to me and a handful of legal Twitter folks, but the DC Circuit issued an administrative injunction, not a stay (they enjoined the Archives from acting, they didn't stay a district court order)
At 6pm today, barring court action, the Nat'l Archives is set to turn over four pages to the Jan. 6 committee that Trump claims are shielded by exec privilege. DOJ maintains they're not covered by an order that's delayed production of other contested docs
After DOJ filed the initial letter last night alerting the DC Circuit this was set to happen, Trump's lawyer filed a response around midnight insisting this would violate the earlier injunction pending SCOTUS action s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2118…
DOJ replied this a.m., maintaining that the injunction clearly only applied to the first three tranches of docs, and that Trump had a chance to try to argue in court re: the fourth tranche, and instead limited that effort to SCOTUS, which hasn't acted yet s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2118…
Initially six pages were at issue, and DOJ said Trump only objected yesterday to two pages that "include content" in "similar" docs from an earlier set covered by the injunction, so they won't release them now. Trump's lawyer argues the intent to produce these docs is misconduct

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Zoe Tillman

Zoe Tillman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ZoeTillman

Mar 28
Court action this afternoon/evening:
2-1 order from the DC Circuit denying request by the US Conference of Catholic Bishops to restore appropriated federal funds for refugee resettlement programs that the Trump admin cut off; Judge Millett dissents
assets.bwbx.io/documents/user…Image
Image
In a 2-1 order (another Millett dissent), the DC Circuit said it would let Trump fire two independent agency officials, boosting the admin's push to expand his power to control the makeup of these entities. One fired official is preparing to ask the full circuit to reconsider:
bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Meanwhile, a 4th Circuit panel lifted restrictions on the role that Elon Musk and people affiliated with his DOGE project can play in dismantling USAID (but was divided on the underlying merits of the constitutional fight over the power Musk is exercising)
bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Read 7 tweets
Mar 7
A DC judge said today he’ll likely order the Trump admin's government efficiency office to preserve its records; no immediate ruling on whether DOGE is subject to FOIA
buff.ly/mycbsPj
The judge told the DOJ lawyer appearing today in the DOGE FOIA case to "advise your clients" ASAP about the likelihood of a preservation order. Trump admin contends the records law doesn't apply to DOGE
bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
The judge told the DOJ lawyer appearing today in the DOGE FOIA case to "advise your clients" ASAP about the likelihood of a preservation order. Trump admin contends the records law doesn't apply to DOGE
bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Read 4 tweets
Mar 7
ICYMI: Trump announced a new policy requiring DOJ to demand in court that challengers suing the admin should have to post money bonds if they win orders blocking his actions. Several judges have already rejected such requests
buff.ly/11JLZfZ
DC judge denied motion to restrict DOGE access at Treasury. NY judge's injunction remains in place for now.

DC judge said plaintiffs couldn't show irreparable harm re: personal data becoming public -- but they could come back if the situation changed
assets.bwbx.io/documents/user…Image
Overnight: Washington state AG filed a contempt motion accusing the Trump administration of defying an injunction that blocked cutting off federal funds to institutions that provide gender-affirming care in the states that sued assets.bwbx.io/documents/user…Image
Read 4 tweets
Feb 22
We've got ourselves an old fashioned Friday news dump. What's happened over the past few hours:
- SCOTUS declined, for now, to let Trump oust the head of a federal whistleblower protection agency, letting the official stay in the job until at least Wednesday. From Greg Stohr: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
- DOJ took the unusual step of confirming that it had filed a misconduct complaint against a DC fed judge over her handling of recent hearings in litigation over Trump's effort to bar trans troops from serving in the US military. With Erik Larson: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Read 6 tweets
Feb 5
A Mass. federal judge set a hearing for tomorrow on whether to immediately halt the Elon Musk-affiliated "Fork in the Road" deferred resignation offer for federal workers from the Trump admin. Prev: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…

Meanwhile, a DC federal judge is holding a hearing now on whether to intervene re: Treasury Dept. giving info to Musk's DOGE team. Prev: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…Image
Some more court action later in the day:
- Re: Trump's bar on transgender troops, judge isn't ruling on the motion for an immediate TRO after US basically said status quo will remain pending a fight over a longer-term prelim injunction, but judge says govt must immediately alert her + plaintiffs if that'll changeImage
- DC federal judge set a Friday hearing to consider whether to grant a TRO blocking DOGE from getting access to Dept. of Labor systems and information. See earlier from @swillmer: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…Image
Read 6 tweets
Nov 5, 2024
Interesting hearing this evening in Missouri’s lawsuit seeking to block DOJ from sending two election observers to monitor a St. Louis polling site on Election Day. No ruling from the bench (recap below)
Complaint: assets.bwbx.io/documents/user…
DOJ oppo: assets.bwbx.io/documents/user…
Missouri argues state law spells out who can enter a polling place to observe and DOJ monitors aren’t covered. DOJ says there’s a 2021 settlement with the St. Louis board of elections for ADA violations re: disability access that allows this
But Missouri AG says it appeared it was news to state officials that this agreement was in effect, and more broadly, that the board lacked authority to enter into the monitoring term in the first place. Which raises some Qs for the judge...
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(