Thomas Wood 🌊 Profile picture
Jan 19 22 tweets 5 min read
Was Michael Simmons, identified by Mother Jones as the operation leader for J6, deeply implicated in a much wider plot to block the transfer of power to Biden that involved, not just Rhodes, but also the likes of Giuliani, Stone, Bannon, and Sidney Powell? 1/21
This possibility began to dawn on me when I read an FBI 302 (interrogation report) on Simmons dated 8 Dec 2021 that is available on the web at Politico. 2/21 tinyurl.com/y7dhllup
Much about what Simmons told the FBI on 8 Dec 2021 made no sense, particularly in the light of the DoJ charge of seditious conspiracy dated Jan 12 (seven days ago) against Stewart Rhodes and 10 other Oath Keepers. 3/21
Simmons was on a GoToMeeting (see par. 19 of the indictments) on 9 Nov 2020 in which Rhodes was perfectly clear that the project was to stop the lawful transfer of power on Jan 6, by force if necessary. 4/21 tinyurl.com/y7sb2fmh
Any sensible person who heard something like that would get the hell out of there ASAP--or even better, call the FBI immediately after the call. But Simmons did neither. Instead, in the narrative on his 302 Simmons painted himself as pure and as innocent as the driven snow. 5/21
He followed up this claim in an interview published on 26 July 2022. There he said he had told the FBI everything he knew and that he had done nothing wrong.

We can assume that the FBI didn’t buy it then, and I’m certain the FBI certainly doesn’t believe that narrative now. 6/21
Another thing in that interview (in Mother Jones) that struck me as odd was the disclosure by Simmons that he was a former employee of Blackwater. (Yes, that Blackwater, Erik Prince’s infamous security contracting firm), 7/21 tinyurl.com/ybm7ccsa
and a light went on in my head when I read Simmons’s 302 this morning and saw the following (on p. 3): 8/21
This was highly suspicious. Was the security contractor (name blacked out) Erik Prince’s infamous security contractor firm Blackwater? If so, what was in it for Blackwater? And why would Simmons be paying Simmons through a security firm anyway? 9/21
Blackwater is closely connected with Trump, Stone, Giuliani and all the other major players in the attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election. 10/21
So the question arises: did Simmons fail to disclose essential facts about his and Rhodes’s involvement with Blackwater in his 8 Dec 2021 interview with the FBI and in his 26 July 2022 interview with Mother Jones because he felt he *had* to? 11/21
Oath Keepers James and Minuta, who have been indicted for seditious conspiracy, provided security for Roger Stone on the night of Jan 5 (when Stone was accompanied by Michael Flynn), and were doing the same for Stone at the Willard on Jan 6 before they left for the Capitol. 12/21
Here is an ABC News video of Stone at the Willard on the morning of Jan 6. The two Oath Keepers in the video have been identified as James and Minuta. 13/21 tinyurl.com/y7b73fk7
Further inquiries using Google search led me this evening to videos of an interview of Stewart Rhodes’s estranged son, Dakota V. Adams (formerly Dakota V. Rhodes). It is dated Jan 10, two days before the filing of the Jan 12 seditious conspiracy indictments. 14/21
These are must-watch videos. Rhodes’s estranged son relates several revealing vignettes about his father, and also gives his reasons for thinking that if you want to find out just how shady J6 was, you need to look at Flynn, Erik Prince (Blackwater!), and Roger Stone. 15/21
Dakota Adams predicted that the prosecution of his father (which he predicted) would be a trial run for getting him to flip, and that the feds are really after the financing of the movement and the political ringleaders like the above and also Powell and Giuliani. 16/21
Adams’s interview provides further reason for thinking that Garland is actively investigating the ringleaders,

and also that he is following the money--which will likely lead to Erik Prince, among others. (Adams’s remarks about Blackwater are particularly interesting.) 17/21
If Sidney Blumenthal has it right, the investigations should also lead to the donors in a highly secretive right-wing organization called the Council on National Policy. 18/21 tinyurl.com/y3hnkqev
The full interview is 2-½ hours long. It is hard to watch because the interviewer kept going off on innumerable tangents. Adams actually complained about this several times, and deplored the fact that the interview had turned into “Tangent Town.” 19/21
There is a much shorter clip that the podcaster interviewer (a guy named Jim Stewartson) has posted that gives the most important points. tinyurl.com/y8ofpubl 20/21
But the much longer interview does provide important context and some fascinating family vignettes about Steward Rhodes. It is worth watching if you can stand the interviewer, who really is insufferable and incompetent as an interviewer. 21/21 tinyurl.com/ycnxamzh

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Thomas Wood 🌊

Thomas Wood 🌊 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @twoodiac

Jan 17
Interesting. It is virtually certain that the operation leader for the Oath Keepers Jan 6 operation was a certain Michael Simmons.

Mother Jones (July 26, 2021): We’ve Unmasked the Oath Keepers’ January 6 “Operations Leader” 1/16 tinyurl.com/ybm7ccsa
It is also virtually certain that Simmons, the operation leader, has flipped, because (1) we know from the Jan 12 Oath Keepers seditious conspiracy indictments that Simmons was not charged for seditious conspiracy (he wasn’t one of the 11 who were) 2/16 tinyurl.com/y7sb2fmh
and (2) because it is hard to imagine why he wouldn’t have been charged along with the other eleven if he hadn’t flipped. 3/16
Read 17 tweets
Jan 16
There are two passages in the Oath Keepers indictments whose significance has gone unnoticed by the commentators. These passages suggest that someone in the inner circle of the Oath Keepers has already flipped and become a DoJ informant. 1/20
Paragraph 19 of the charging document: The charging document identifies individuals Rhodes trusted as part of his inner circle, and names them. Question: why is the *operation leader* not named, and why was s/he not indicted? 2/20 tinyurl.com/y7sb2fmh
The above paragraph is incorporated in the part of the document (paragraphs 14 through 134) concerned with the key seditious conspiracy charge (18 USC § 2384). 3/20
Read 22 tweets
Jan 15
Here’s the key statute in Rhodes’s indictment (“SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY”: 18 U.S. Code § 2384). Note that the use of the term “force” is different in kind from the other charges against Rhodes and his co-conspirators. 1/13 tinyurl.com/j6eap2p
Other charges include: obstruction of an official proceeding; conspiracy to prevent an officer to discharge any duties; destruction of government property; civil disorder; assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers; destroying documents on or after Jan 6. 2/13
All of these other federal crimes were committed *in the course of pursuing seditious conspiracy.* (Consider especially “...or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any *law* of the United States.”) 3/13
Read 14 tweets
Jan 13
“The DoJ alleges the defendants conspired to forcefully oppose the transfer of power between then-President Donald Trump to Joe Biden, including by trying to take control of the U.S. Capitol.” 1/5 tinyurl.com/yavthzp4
Let me note that the use of encrypted digital messages strongly corroborates my criticism on Jan 5 of a thread by @SethAbramson. 2/5 tinyurl.com/ydfjmss9
The same point was made recently by @glennkirschner2 3/5
tinyurl.com/y8zhh7dm
Read 6 tweets
Dec 20, 2021
I think there is at least a 50-50 chance that Trump will be indicted and convicted for serious *federal* crimes. It is therefore highly relevant that a Republican POTUS in Jan 2025 could pardon Trump for those crimes. 1/5
That is another reason why politics is the name of the game behind Trump’s lawsuit against Letitia James.

Trump is announcing, among other things, that there will be a loyalty test for all R politicians in the midterms and in 2024. 2/5
The loyalty test is to ignore any state or federal crimes he has undoubtedly committed.

For Trump, it has always been a question about who you are for and who you are against--and certainly not the law.

And you have to be *for* him. He has always demanded complete loyalty. 3/5
Read 6 tweets
Dec 20, 2021
"Mr. Trump’s lawsuit comes less than two weeks after Ms. James signaled that she would seek to question Mr. Trump under oath early next month."

He's scared to death.

nytimes.com/2021/12/20/nyr…
He's doing this to block the subpoena to testify under oath. But it's such a flakey move it will only get him a very short delay. In the meantime, it's a bad look for Trump. It makes him look like he's running from the law, which he is. He's getting desperate.
I expect, momentarily, to see all the legal experts weighing in about what a flakey move this is by Trump. But Trump must *know* that it is a flakey *legal* move. (He isn’t that stupid.) But to understand his motive here, it is necessary to look at the *politics*.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(