Eric is telling us we absolutely *must* suddenly change our voting laws because in the next 250 years, we'll add another ONE THOUSAND states to the union.
Even if you add every single U.S. territory (14 total, including unincorporated, unorganized and unpopulated islands), even those without civilian populations, that's 28 more senators.
If you chop every single state, not just the big ones, into 5 states that's 200 more.
So we're at say, a total of 278 senators, including the ones we have now. Hell, let's be generous and say the four biggest states, AK, TX, CA, and MT are chopped into 15, not 5 states. That's 40 more states, or 80 more senators, for a grand total of 358 senators out of his 2,000.
We have 1,642 senators to go, or an additional 821 states left to create, and we've pretty much exhausted U.S. lands.
What do we annex as states after that? Any additional land would be a part of foreign countries, so which ones do we ask/force to be part of the United States?
How about Greenland? It's 4.5 times smaller than the U.S., so that's an additional 11 states, but let's give it five times the number of states and call it 55, or 110 extra senators.
We're down to 1,532 senators to go, and we've already started annexing foreign countries.
Let's take Canada next. It's roughly the same size as the U.S., so let's chop it into another 250 states like we did with the U.S. 500 more senators, leaving a dearth of only 1,032 senators.
How about Mexico? Five times smaller than the U.S., so we can make a bunch more states of that. That'd be 50 more states of the same size (1/5th the average state size) for another 100 senators. Down to only 932 left, and the United States is all of North America plus Greenland.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
People rioted, burned down cities, and killed people over a trial verdict they didn't like. Now imagine the chaos over the goods in your area's last generator-powered grocery, when no one has had anything but rotted food in a dead fridge for three weeks.
Anything run on electric is long dead. The last of the fossil fuels has gone to the few remaining hospitals still holding out. You're down to opening cans and scarfing down cold pork n' beans in the dark, trying to figure out how to communicate with friends and relatives.
Your phone's worthless, your internet's dead, your tv nothing more than a picture of midnight on the wall. You have no idea what's happening anywhere else, only that your entire area is still and silent, and nothing is being done to turn anything back on.
They've already told you what they're doing. And they call you the terrorists, the fascists:
"We are working day and night, around the clock to make sure their lives are as miserable and difficult as possible."
"Oh, but I'm not alt-right!" you cry.
Yes. Yes you are. We all are. Conservatives, moderates, liberals, normal people who don't have anything to do with politics. We're all the alt-right to the left. All it takes is a disagreement on ideology, or policy issues, or our existence.
"We're trying everything we can to ensure these people are not given any breaks in life. From preventing them from travelling abroad... to closing down their bank accounts... encouraging members of the public to throw food stuffs at them."
The life expectancy in 1521 in Europe was between 30 and 40 years of age. The poorest people ate mostly bread and beans. They suffered from plague, tuberculosis, and an assortment of other maladies in addition to cancer.
Today, you can buy a ten pound bag of chicken for $6.98.
This brings us to an interesting linguistics point. In the Middle Ages, because poor people couldn't afford meat they couldn't raise or catch, only the rich ate the better cuts of meat. The poor could raise a few chickens, and pull some fish out of the river, but not much more.
In England during this time, English was a dying language—the third most spoken in the land. Latin was the language of the educated, the scientific community and such, and French was the language of the nobles and upper class folks. Only the poor spoke their native English.
A THREAD: The research, study, or theory that bona fide human treatment, medicine, or vitamins would not hurt, and may indeed help fight COVID-19, followed by the resulting reaction from media and government. We start with...
UV light treatment vs. "Drinking/injecting bleach."
Hydroxychloroquine vs. "Fish tank cleaner." (Conflating hydroxychloroquine with chloroquine phosphate, a completely different chemical compound.)
Ivermectin vs. "Horse dewormer." The media took this false narrative to such a frenzy, conflating Nobel Prize-winning, prescribed, human ivermectin with veterinarian-grade medication that the U.S. FDA even jumped aboard the mockery.