HAPPENING NOW: Prosecutors are arguing for the pretrial detention of Ed Vallejo, an Oath Keeper charged last week with seditious conspiracy for efforts to disrupt transfer of power.
As the riots were going on at the Capitol, Vallejo texted someone “we have taken the Capitol," prosecutors say.
Proescutors say they haven't really kept tabs on Vallejo since February, when he first spoke with law enforcement.
“Whether he’s amassing guerilla weapons or whether he’s sitting watching TV we can’t say.”
VALLEJO's attorney now arguing for his release while awaiting trial.
She emphasizes that DOJ had nearly all of the evidence it has today about Vallejo for the past year but didn't decide to arrest and charge him until last week, a year after the Capitol attack.
Prosecutors describe what Vallejo did as "mindboggling" — that he offered to drive heavy weaponry into the city and kept pushing for a more violent outcome and even attempted to launch a reconaissance drone.
Magistrate Judge John Boyle going over the evidence now and will make his detention decision shortly.
BOYLE appears to be leaning toward detaining him. He says the nature of the crime — a threat to democracy itself — and the evidence of Vallejo's role in the alleged conspiracy lean heavily in favor of pretrial detention.
Going over other factors now.
BOYLE notes that Vallejo was in charge of the Oath Keepers weapons stash, housed at a hotel in Arlington, Va. But he was never given the order to ferry them into DC.
"I’m convinced tha thad it been given … you would have responded on that day and followed out that order."
The judge notes that Vallejo made an incendiary/violent remark last month about vaccine mandates.
"There appears to be no evidence before me now of remorse or your statements past Jan. 2021. "
"If Mr. Rhodes had given that ordfer you would have complied," Boyle says. "You are a serious danger at this time."
"The court will order your detention as a danger."
Ed VALLEJO will be held pending trial and will be transported to DC.
BOYLE asks if Vallejo, who is present by phone, if he heard the ruling.
VALLEJO: "I heard every word, sir."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Rep. Andy BIGGS used his opening statement at a Judiciary Committee hearing on prison reform to claim that "most" Jan. 6 pretrial detainees held in DC jail should have been released.
He says that because many of them had no prior criminal history, the ~50 detainees or so should never have been held.
But criminal history is just 1 of 4 factors judges consider in detention. And every one of them was judged too dangerous for release or a flight risk.
Some of the detention decisions have been close calls for judges, including some Trump appointees who have agreed to detain several of the Jan. 6 defendants.
Others have not been particularly close questions.
NEW: Jan. 6 investigators are increasingly focused on the Trump campaign and White House’s role in assembling false slates of presidential electors — who then signed certificates claiming to be real and shipped them to Congress.
The select committee is awaiting a tranche of documents from the National Archives that would shed light on efforts to pass off the false slate as legitimate. Multiple states have investigated the matter and referred it to federal authorities. politico.com/news/2022/01/2…
MORE: I began asking Trump electors in Nov. 2020 whether they favored sending false ‘alternative’ slates to Congress. The strategy had emerged among Trump allies and appeared poised to cause a mess as Trump tried to subvert the election. What they told me: politico.com/news/2022/01/2…
"Rhodes stood at the center of the seditious conspiracy—orchestrating plans to use force, recruiting and financing co-conspirators, purchasing weaponry and tactical gear, inciting support and action, and endeavoring to conceal his and other co-conspirators’ crimes"
Proescutors also say their search of Rhodes' phone in May showed he had deleted evidence of his involvement in the Capitol attack.
2) KELLOGG told the panel that staff advocadted against Trump doing a live briefing amid the attack because they were worried about him going off-message.
3) Sean Hannity urged press secretary Kayleigh McEnany on Jan. 7 to tell Trump to stop discussing the stolen election and that efforts to invoke the 25h Amendment or Impeach him were real. politico.com/news/2022/01/2…
HAPPENING NOW: Trump spokesman Taylor Budowich is fighting the Jan. 6 committee in court over the panel's access to his financial records.
Yesterday's Supreme Corut ruling is already having a ripple effect here.
Judge in Budowich notes that the Supreme Court left in place the Appeals Corut determination that the Jan. 6 committee has a legitimate legislative purpose — effectively invalidating claims by Trump allies that it doesn't.
BUDOWICH's attorney now arguing that the committee is invalid because it doesn't have a full slate of 13 members. Judge Boasberg now asking House counsel to respond to that claim.