Did the Roman Empire have a secret police/intelligence service? Like many states, it had several, with duties that overlapped and varied over time. These included the Speculatores, Frumentarii, Areani, Agentes in Rebus, and even the Corps of Notories.
THREAD:
It should of course be rembered that much of this information is tentative - such units are, by definition, secretive. Still, information comes through in small amounts in sources and on the gravestones of soldiers.
The Speculatores were military scouts. Although mostly responsible for traditional reconnaissance, at least the Praetorian Guard's Speculatores under Galba, Otho, and the Flavian Dynasty, often worked in plainclothes and were responsible for close protection and assassination.
Julius, the merciful centurion who escorted St Paul to Rome, is described in Acts 27:1 as being of the "Augustan band." There was a Legio II Augusta, but as it was stationed far from Palestine it is possible this man was one of these Imperial bodyguards on secret police duty.
The Frumentarii were originally soldiers responsible for the collection of grain - their name literally comes from Frumentum, grain - and this job often involved interacting with civilians in small groups or alone, at great distance form the main army.
Although they always served as supply sergeants and messangers, under the Emperor Hadrian they began to serve as secret police. Based at the Castra Peregrina in Rome, there were Frumentarii in every province. A story shows just how deep their ability to gather intelligence went:
The wife of an imperial official wrote to him, claiming that he was ignoring her and spending too much time at the bathhouse. The Frumentarii secretly read the letter, and Hadrian reproached him for it. The startled official wondered if his wife had wrote the emperor as well!
This was not a secret assignment, at least after retirement, and Frumentarii were sufficiently proud of their service to note it on their gravestones and to make inscriptions honoring the genus, or guardian spirit, of the Castra Peregrina.
We know far less about units responsible for foreign intelligence, but they certainly existed - Ammianus Marcellinus, writing in the 4th century, describes the Areani, a group responsible for collecting information north of Hadrian's wall.
Unfortunately for Rome, these men were bribed and went native, providing information to local chieftains on the Roman army. It is almost certain that similar units existed along the more important frontiers of the Rhine, Danube, and border with Persia.
Areani may translate to "of the sheepfolds" but there is another possibility. A tablet from the Roman fort at Vindolanda, on Hadrian's Wall, says "Miles Arcanu[s]," or secret soldier. It is possible this was the unit's true name, miscopied by a medieval scribe.
The Emperor Diocletian disbanded the unpopular Frumentarii, replacing them with the civilian Agentes in Rebus, or general agents, along with the Corps of Notories. However, as Russians say about the KGB and FSB - "new name, same friendly service."
Like the Frumentarii, the Agentes were not only a security service, working also as couriers, central bureaucrats, and even ambassadors. Along with the rest of the Late Roman civil service, they were organized along military lines.
The notories had, at least in some cases, similar tasks. One senior notary under Constantius II, Paulus Catena - "Paul the Chain" - earned his nickname from his favorite method of torture on the emperor's suspected enemies. He was feared throughout the empire.
Many of those he had killed were in fact loyal, honorable men. However, like many totalitarian thugs throughout history, he ended up hoist by his own petard, and was himself tried and burned alive.
Both agencies continued in the Eastern Empire, and the Agentes even remained in the government of Ostrogothic Italy. This is only a survey of these organizations, but it sheds a light on the omnipresent grimmer side of empire.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I feel like I haven't done a good book thread in a while. A thread with excerpts from The Sinews of Power: War, Money, and the English State, 1688-1783 by John Brewer:
The English state was remarkably centralized as far back as Anglo-Saxon times, with a national system of law and strong monarchy. Opposition was channeled through a single parliament, and therefore took on a national character as well.
Contrast this with the far more decentralized France, where the great political conflict was between the monarchy and regional elites and where the estates-general was unable to become a unified political force.
A thread with excerpts from Napoleon's Other War: Bandits, Rebels and their Pursuers in the Age of Revolutions by Michael Broers:
Banditry-cum-guerilla warfare was endemic to Corsica, where local notables waged blood feuds and maintained networks of armed men. As a young man, Napoleon and his family had far more exposure to this kind of war than to "conventional" fighting of artillery and big battalions.
Napoleon and the various factions of revolutionary radicals had their differences, but they paled in comparison to the gulf between them and the peasant counter-revolutionaries, who they viewed as backwards hicks whipped into banditry by their priests.
Machiavelli (in Discourses on Livy) on how difficult it is to change political institutions that have outlived their purpose. They can't be changed through normal politics (they *are* the normal politics) and someone willing to bypass them rarely has the public good in mind.
A major challenge to a state moving from authoritarianism to republican government -- all of the hacks who "were prevailing under the tyrannical state" feel obligated to it, while those who prosper under freedom simply believe they are getting what they deserve.
If the people of a republic turn to one man to defend them against the rich and powerful, "it will always happen that he will make himself tyrant of the city." He will eliminate the elite first and then turn on the people once there is no one else to stop him.
Richard Pipes describes the Kievan Rus as initially resembling "the East India or Hudson's Bay companies, founded to make money but compelled by the absence of any administration in the area of their operations to assume quasi-governmental responsibilities."
Mongol influence has etched itself into the Russian language. It is the origin of numerous Russian words relating to administration or brutality, from money (деньги) to shackles (кандалы).
Russian had somewhat distinct terms for private and public lordship, and Muscovite Tsars adopted the former to describe their rule.
The NDS, the former Afghan government's intelligence agency, was actually quite good at infiltrating the Taliban, running agents inside Pakistan, and compiling evidence that the Taliban was backed by the ISI as part of a deliberate plot to destabilize Afghanistan.
The US dismissed this as an excuse to cover for the Afghan government's weakness and corruption.
"The American diplomat will be in your valley tomorrow if you want to kidnap them."
Thread with excerpts from Phoenix and the Birds of Prey: Counterinsurgency and Counterterrorism in Vietnam by Mark Moyar:
Local support for the Viet Cong was not motivated by nationalism or communism (which even many party members had a weak understanding of) but by village level grievances, especially support for land reform and lower rents and interest rates.
The areas where support for the VC was weakest, on the other hand, where those populated by ethnic minorities or by well organized religious groups like Roman Catholics or the Hoa Hao and Cao Dai Buddhists.