It’s an obscenity that the machinery of the British legal system can be used to target & harass journalists. This has to stop. I am profoundly grateful to Gavin Millar QC for setting out the legal & moral case for why we must defend public interest journalism.
And I survived 🙏
I wasn’t on trial for my life. But I was. My professional reputation, my career, potentially my home. I survived because I had to. And because I was lifted & supported by so many others who understood this was about something much bigger than me. And that I couldn’t do it alone.
What happens next is up to the judge. The verdict won’t be for weeks. But no-one who witnessed what happened in court can be in any doubt that this was about more than 23 words. The entire process was designed to punish, shame & humiliate me.
But I wasn’t shamed & humiliated. The amazing @jesssearch told me on first morning this is the advice given to female survivors of sexual assault. You can’t be shamed if you choose not to be. It’s in your control. It’s a Jedi mind trick & it works. I chose not to be.
So whatever happens, I won. I’m still standing. Because nearly 30,000 people have had my back & contributed to my 2 crowdfunders. Because I had a wall of people around me this week. And because I’ve decided: I will not be shamed.
This is a landmark case for the public interest defence. Judge must decide: were the words my honest belief. And was that belief reasonable. That’s it. Whatever happens, *I* know the truth. Of overwhelming public interest of the story. And that I couldn’t have worked any harder
My evidence included a tape recording of Banks’s associate Andy Wigmore admitting to illegally surveilling a journalist. And 2 days ago, @liambyrnemp told parliament, MI5 found evidence the information commissioner was being illegally surveilled by Banks independent.co.uk/news/uk/politi…
‘Reporting by Observer & Guardian journalist Carole Cadwalladr on the “covert relationship” between multimillionaire Brexit backer Arron Banks & Russian govt was of greatest public interest imaginable, her lawyer told the high court.’ By @Haroon_Siddique theguardian.com/world/2022/jan…
And earlier tweet got deleted so here’s @rebecca_vincent of @RSF_en who monitored the case on behalf of 19 freedom of expression orgs. So grateful for them all 🙏
A new investigation by @thenerve_news has found Palantir has recruited more than 30 senior officials from UK govt, a strategy transparency experts say poses an ‘acute risk’ of corruption. 1/
Link ⬇️
Palantir recruited the two most senior AI strategists from the Ministry of Defence & NHS…& won multimillion £ contracts with both, a pattern repeated across the UK govt. 2/
NEW: I’ve found an opaque financial vehicle owns a large chunk of the Observer. And neither it or the Guardian will say who it is. Why?
Well there is a clue. Which goes by way of Saudi Arabia… 1/
The capture of US media orgs is accelerating. And the UK is next in line. The BBC has fallen to an AI hype guy. And my old newspaper, the Observer, is publishing Palantir puff pieces.
Distracted by the slaughter of children in Iran & Lebanon? Me too! But what better time could there be for govt to quietly relaunch its Digital ID plan?
Missed it? Me too! But look who’s celebrating…
The director of ‘govt innovation’ at the Tony Blair Institute! 1/
The govt noisily scrapped Digital ID after huge pushback when nobody bought its ‘it’ll solve immigration’ bollocks. But as markets tanked last week - kudos to the comms team! - it was discreetly re-launched with all-new messaging: a ‘common sense solution to everyday probs’
2/
Darren Jones, Cabinet Office secretary, put out a press release claiming the govt will be holding a ‘consultation’.
NOT: ‘Do you want the govt & unknown tech companies to have all your data?’
BUT: (I kid you not): ‘At what age should you be able to get a digital id?’ 🤔 3/
Congrats to all the news orgs that signed syndication deals with this company. You’ve licensed your journalism to be a core component of Trump’s illegal war machine. Great job everyone 👏
A special shoutout to the editor-in-chief & CEO of the Guardian, Kath Viner & Anna Bateson. The deal with OpenAI was an unforced error which legitimised OpenAI’s illegal scraping of Guardian data & IP. In exchange for a quick buck. The NYTimes, in contrast, chose to sue.
Anthropic stood up to Trump. But OpenAI has capitulated. And now all its ‘partners’ are complicit in the consequences.
That includes Guardian. It will financially benefit from its journalists’ work - inc mine - being used to support Trump’s illegal wars & ICE’s reign of terror.