Emiel van Druten Profile picture
Jan 22, 2022 14 tweets 10 min read Read on X
Wind and solar drive the energy transition, but what system questions are still open for a country like 🇳🇱?
1⃣Local vs centralized
2⃣Enough renewables + import H2
vs oversize renewables + P2G and/or export to 🇩🇪🇧🇪
3⃣Which firm low-carbon sources?
4⃣Gradual vs. fast transition
🧵
1⃣Local and distributed vs centralized and utility scale:
@DrChrisClack finds in 'Why Local Solar For All Costs Less' that the transition is cheaper when we start with grid upgrades, flex and storage in the built environment.
📰vibrantcleanenergy.com/wp-content/upl…
🎙️xenetwork.org/ets/episodes/e…
This year together with @AukeHoekstra we will make the HOLON-tool for testing policy changes to better facilitate local energy initiatives and semi-autonomous energy systems (SAES). Let’s find out it local is better and cheaper…
📰topsectorenergie.nl/sites/default/…
2⃣ Enough renewables + import H2
vs oversize renewables
II3050 (Integral Infrastructure Survey) covers this in scenarios EU+international vs. regional+national. They find that without sufficient oversizing P2G can’t compete with imported H2.
📰netbeheernederland.nl/_upload/files/…
This suggest that there is no optimum in the middle but rather that there are multiple local optima. When already having started oversizing offshore wind and then finding out P2G can't compete would be very costly, because then the grid isn’t upgraded for transporting this energy
This is where the ‘and/or export to 🇩🇪🇧🇪 part’ comes in. This is currently not part of the Dutch policy scenarios. @RonnieBelmans argues grid expansion should be prioritized over P2G for the integration of renewable energy
🎙️ open.spotify.com/episode/5mwa8a…
Exporting oversized offshore wind as electricity to our neighbors 🇩🇪&🇧🇪 (they have a smaller sea area), should have been the EU governance scenario in my opinion. This study for 2040 shows massive congestion toward the boarder with 🇩🇪&🇧🇪…
📰offshorewind.rvo.nl/file/view/5504…
Energy system optimization studies by @timtroendle and @fneum_ show that a continental optimization with large transmission expansion is cheaper than national/regional optimization.
📰 doi.org/10.1016/j.joul…
📰 doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr…
3⃣Which firm low-carbon sources?
Many studies only model batteries and hydrogen storage. These can get us to 100% renewable, however a more diversified set of technologies might be cheaper. 🔋
The study ‘CO2-free flexibility options for the Dutch power system’ looks broader, but the assumptions feel outdated. With a more realistic WACC, carbon and commodity and price, I estimate many more technologies will be profitable.
📰 rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/rap…
Under what conditions long duration energy storage techniques can compete with firm sources like nuclear or gas with CCS is very well explored in this paper by @JesseJenkins
📰 dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560…
🎙️open.spotify.com/episode/2JkgVv…
It would definitely be worth exploring the near-optimal solutions space under cost uncertainty like @fneum_ and @nworbmot did, but with some additional (storage) technologies. (tip: discussed April 1⃣st @#EnergyTwitterFridayAfternoonDrink)
📰 arxiv.org/abs/2111.14443
4⃣Gradual vs fast transition
This study shows that for the world a fast transition is cheaper than a gradual transition, due to technology learning curves.
📰 inet.ox.ac.uk/publications/n…
🎙️ xenetwork.org/ets/episodes/e… @TransitionShow
A small country like 🇳🇱 doesn’t have a huge effect on learning curves.
However given we are in the EU ETS a smart strategy is decarbonizing quickly before the carbon prices hurt too much. We need smart policies to accelerate the energy transition.⚡️📈

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Emiel van Druten

Emiel van Druten Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EmielVanDruten

Oct 25, 2023
Is the @IEA finally learning how to forecast solar PV deployment?🤔
This is my PowerPoint attempt to update the famous @AukeHoekstra graph, projected on last year's update by @CarbonBrief. I hope @DrSimEvans is working on a proper 🤓. 🧵(1)
Image
The STEPS scenario has 500 GW/year PV deployment by 2030.
The Higher solar uptake case (based on NZE) with 820 GW by 2030 is way more likely if you ask me. 📈 (2) Image
Arguments for why NZE is more likely than STEPS are presented by IEA themselves: "China could accelerate solar PV deployment to shift away from coal faster". I suggest changing "could" into "will", just because PV is more economical than coal. 🇨🇳 (3) Image
Read 7 tweets
Jul 14, 2023
Our graduate student Bram Vloedgraven is presenting his thesis today titled "System Role of Energy Hubs in the North Sea: An Energy System Optimization Study." 🌬️⚡️🫧 (1/4)
https://t.co/xbkSiHtm4wessay.utwente.nl/95627/
Image
The most relevant scenario is #8, with a meshed offshore HVDC grid and offshore hydrogen production that supplies industry in the 🇳🇱&🇩🇪. A lot of onshore hydrogen production from 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿&🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 is exported via pipelines. Also 🇩🇰 exports both power and hydrogen ⚡️🫧. (2/4)

Image
Image
Image
These figures show the energy system optimization approach using the open-source PyPSA framework (left) and the offshore regions and nodes at which the model can choose to deploy en connect offshore wind (right). (3/4) Image
Read 6 tweets
Jul 4, 2023
Het Nationaal Plan Energiesysteem (NPE) is al in draadjes samengevat door o.a. @LennertGoemans. Daarom zet ik het NPE in perspectief middels de bijlage Vergelijkende analyse systeemstudies en scenario-analyses energiesysteem, waar ik aan meewerkte. 🧵 rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/rap…
M.b.t. energieketens is de grote lijn duidelijk: nu elektriciteit verduurzamen en fossiele vraag elektrificeren. Vanaf 2030 grijze waterstof groen maken en rond 2035 wordt waterstof ook back-up bron voor elektriciteit. Vanaf 2040 met waterstof synthetische koolwaterstoffen maken.
Onzekerheid zit na 2040 in bunkerbrandstoffen voor internationale scheep- en luchtvaart en niet-energetisch verbruik in de industrie. NPE stop in 2050 met fossiel, maar onzeker is de verhouding biogeen versus synthetisch via waterstof en importeren versus zelf produceren.
Read 11 tweets
Jan 19, 2022
@LennertGoemans vertelt komende vrijdag om 16:30 bij de #EnergyTwitterVrijMiBo hoe @MinisterieEZK middels Programma Energiehoofdstructuur (PEH), Programma Energiesysteem (PES) en programma's PIDI en VAWOZ en nog enkele studies tot een Nationaal plan energiesysteem 2050 wil komen!
PM me als je bij een tweewekelijkse #EnergyTwitterVrijMiBo wil zijn. Op de planning staan nog:
0⃣4⃣ Feb @MaartenSta over regionale netcongestie bij @Enexis en oplossingrichtingen om te voorkomen dat de energietransitie vertraagt. Image
1⃣8⃣ Feb #EnergyTwitterVrijMiBo met @RuutSchalij over vorderingingen op gebied van kernfusie. Hij vertelt o.a. over zijn rol bij marktonderzoek en ontwikkeling voor het Canadese bedrijf @GeneralFusion. Image
Read 7 tweets
May 17, 2021
Een draadje over de ruimtelijke opbrengst van wind op zee in GWh/km². Deze is vooral afhankelijk van de afstand tussen de turbines (vaak uitgedrukt in aantal kerend en roter diameter, bijv. 8D) en de daaruit volgende windpark dichtheid, bijv. 3,6 MW/km².
northseawindpowerhub.eu/knowledge/cost… Image
Dit 1 GW referentie-windpark met een dichtheid van 3,6 MW/km² beslaat 280 km² en heeft een energie-opbrengst van zo'n 5 TWh op plek met goede windcondities ➡️ 18 GWh/km². Image
Je kunt de turbine-afstand halveren tot 4D waarbij de dichtheid 14 MW/km² wordt. Dan heb je wel te maken met +7,9% zogverliezen. Staat het windpark in een cluster van 4 GW of meer dan loopt dit op tot +14% zogverliezen. ImageImage
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(