Erik Svensson Profile picture
Jan 22 9 tweets 3 min read
Given the recent discussions on EEB Twitter and (justified) calls to #diversifyEEB, it is striking with the lack of national diversity among participants: it is essentially a discussion where all participants across all camps reside in the US, and to a lesser extent Canada 1/
Judged by my Twitter feed (which is diverse, but admittedly a limited sample), my rough estimate is that 90-95 % of those who have been very engaged the last weeks discussing EO Wilson's legacy (among other things) have North American academic affiliations 2/
This is so striking, so I ask myself: where are all the Europeans (I am one of few I have seen)? And where are the Asians, the Latin Americans and the Africans? 3/
The lack of other diversity in terms of geography is striking, and says some interesting about EEB as a field, I think.

But this diversity is seldom even acknowledged; the recent discussions are almost exclusively focussed on the lack of diversity within the US academia 4/
I can't avoid getting the feeling that some of the problems discussed are a bit idiosynchratic and specific to the academic system in the US and connected the history of the US (slavery, segregation laws etc.), whereas the problems in (say) Europe are different (but also real) 5/
EEB is (should be!) bigger than North America and Europe though.

Personally, I am very grateful for my non-European and non-US EEB colleagues I interact with here on Twitter, whose voices are clearly needed. 6/
Shout out to my excellent Indian colleagues @joshiamitabhevo, @NGPrasadevo, @DeepaAgashe, @adubharti, @Jahnavijoshi2 @krushnamegh and many others. We need you!

EEB is not and should not be just a discipline dominated by the US and Europe, neither on Twitter or elsewhere 7/
India is - in my opinion - a "sleeping giant" in evolutionary biology which deserves much more space in our discussions.

India has a small (for its size) but very vibrant evolutionary biology community and are doing some cool work 8/
I encourage all my EEB colleagues in North America and Europe to broaden the geographical diversity among those who you follow and interact with on Twitter so that discussions don't become entirely focused on what some might perceive as domestic US issues 9/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Erik Svensson

Erik Svensson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EvolOdonata

Jan 22
Fully agree with @IslandGenomics and @tncvidya about the US-centric discussions on academic Twitter in general and EEB Twitter in particular, including (unfortunately) recent discussions about #diversify #EEB 1/
Many of us not living in the US or not being affiliated with US academic institutions have no clue about many of the specific issues being discussed and various acronyms such as "gre scores", "DEI initiatives" and so on 2/
It would be useful if our colleagues in the US and North America could look up a bit on the horizon and critically reflect upon the fact that what is being discussed by them on US academic Twitter and EEB Twitter is not always as of much general relevance as you seem to think 3/
Read 8 tweets
Jan 20
Thankyou @hopihoekstra and @CorrieMoreau for removing your names from this blog post led by Razib Kahn.

I agree that the original article in @sciam was very problematic and deserved a critical rebuttal, but Kahn is not the guy who should lead it.

Thread with some thoughts 1/14
I confess I was not aware of the problematic history and questionable views expressed by Razib Kahn in the past, including his opinions on eugenics and affiliations with the "alt-right", but now I have informed myself. And it is not pretty. 2/
For me, Kahn was just a person I followed on Twitter, but given his questionable views on many issues I would never sign anything with him on any topic whatsoever.

Company matters more than one thinks. 3/
Read 14 tweets
Dec 1, 2018
1/ Exactly the same theory was formalized by Russel Lande in 1976 and developed further by other evolutionary quantitative geneticists, and now the molecular biologists and medical scientists are re-discovering it in 2018 as "the omnigenic model" #ReinventingTheWheel
2/ The historical illitteracy and underappreciation of quantitative genetics as a tool from both molecular biologists and unfortunately also some molecularly oriented evolutionary biologists never stops to amaze me
3/ About ten years ago, when I discussed how to interpret and solve "the missing heritability problem" with a molecular ecology postdoc, I got the following (naive) suggestion: "Why not sequence more?"
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(