Getting someone to pay for content or products online depends on:
—depth of relationship between creator & consumer
—relevance & expense of product
Usually, that requires multiple interactions to build trust & most likely....
1/8
...shifting consumers from shallow platforms to ones w/deeper loyalties (like dating—>cohabitating—>engaged—>married—>house—>kids)
Shallowest to deepest social networks:
TikTok
Pinterest
Instagram
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
YouTube
Podcast
Newsletter
Paid (Patreon/Substack)
2/8
Depth varies by creator, user & network + there are multiple connection types (eg friend vs follow)
Depth is driven by
—interaction duration/frequency
—uniqueness & utility of content
—attachment to creations vs creator
—availability of substitutes
Brands use other criteria 3/8
If every Instagrammer died & was replaced by similar-looking ones tomorrow, few would stop scrolling. Brands know that.
Pinterest fully devalues individuals for posts/objects & pinboards/collections. Creators are a conscious afterthought. It assures loyalty to the platform.
4/8
A typical content creator funnel might:
a) grab people on TikTok or Twitter w/clips or threads
b) transition them to Instagram or YouTube
c) then podcast or newsletter
d) finally, convert 5-10% of (c) to paid
This will vary by content type (art, text, video, audio, etc.)
5/8
Product purchases are a bit different.
Products that lend themselves to visual presentation, targeted properly (fun, compelling demo videos), can convert on shallow platforms. Many successes have appeared on @SharkTankABC. Instagram or Facebook work best, maybe Pinterest.
6/8
Businesses can get leads from LinkedIn.
YouTube & podcast product sales are mostly expressions of trust & loyalty to creators, since the same ads appear on many shows & discount codes are a pain.
I also did a ~3-hour, 9-part series on media strategies on my Patreon (Patreon.com/McFuture), but knowing how social media conversions work, you can start w/the free podcast/newsletter at SteveFaktor.com.
Knowing what Twitter's algorithm likes & doesn't will make users please/game it, the way students do teachers for grades, TV execs select programming, & how SEO & clickbait work.
Algorithmic speech is not free speech, even when transparent.
Liv ur life, peepz. If hiphoptimizing the Twitterz be that impotent to you, you did it wrongsies.
Much of "productivity" is *theft of productivity* from others.
Productive legislators, content creators, game developers, lawyers, influencers, marketers, athletes, divert time & attention from others' productivity to casual consumption or admin.
The question is what are we optimizing for?
If it's jobs, then loss of productivity creates a need for more workers.
If it's personal satisfaction, you'd want as much focus as possible.
If it's economic strength, productivity must focus on exportable categories/activities.
The productivity paradox would be moot if it were purely market driven & benign. It's neither.
We're making conscious choices to regulate, incentivize, or ignore countless addictions, powerful technologies & rapacious partisans, who don't have our best interests at heart.
I thought this would go away. It hasn't. A quick thread on what I think is really happening, from an Economics POV.
Start w/this post. Like most scoring systems, it's highly subjective & suggests a misguided interpretation of what's happening today. 1/
The Great Replacement Theory came to light in the US in Charlottesville, where white supremacists chanted "The Jews will not replace us" & other variants.
What they were alluding to is a conspiracy that Jews (who they think run everything) want to replace whites w/minorities.
2/
These white nationalists are mis/re-interpreting:
—the US constitution, which despite our failures to live up to its ideas—was never about "blood & soil", like many European ethnostates
—the prescriptiveness of French philosopher Camus's Great Replacement theory
3/
I'm reading Confessions of an Economic Hitman. Have to admit, it's taking a toll on me.
If even ½ is true (based on history, I'd bet it is), it's hard not to feel powerless & cynical in the shadow of immense soulless forces behind global exploitation & our simplistic narratives.
The more I think about Confessions of an Economic Hitman, the more naive cryptocurrency becomes.
In a world where we use dollar-debt to control third world nations, thinking we'd just surrender that power because libertarian tech bros want to get rich is so preposterous.
How the west controls the third world.
Good summation of the core premise of "Confessions of an Economic Hitman". amzn.to/3Ygcl4n
The details only make it darker.
As the CEO of Blackrock explains, the last thing markets want is democracy:
There is no due process here. Only the thinnest veil of fairness. Decisions have been made in closed rooms. Capitulation & compliance are non-negotiable.
Ironically, it's far kinder than more brutal regimes, where oligarchs rain down from the sky.
1) There is no market for selling commodities inside of buildings. This has been true for small businesses killed by giant chains. It's now true for chains. Experience is inferior, data-poor, too expensive vs. online.
2) There is no middle. The population is bifurcating -> upper middle class & sub-middle class. Like Macy's, malls, or The Gap, the middle is dwindling. Especially, when it's non-specialized, undifferentiated. The numbers back that:
3) To succeed, three realities must be embraced: passionate niches, experiences & impermanence. I'll bucket my ideas this way.
A. Passionate niches
BB&B has several great assets: brand recognition, national physical footprint, supply chain, product categories that can be complex