THREAD: An outrageous move in Chicago. Mayor Lori Lightfoot now wants to use funds police already stole from communities to sue (!) vulnerable relatives of people cops allege are in "gangs." This isn't gun violence prevention. It's more devastation. More: chicago.suntimes.com/2022/1/19/2289…
New Chief Defender of Chicago, Sharone Mitchell (@SharoneMitchJr) knows well: The plan to sue alleged gang members & their families is "a distraction from proven solutions that our communities desperately need.”
In Chicago & elsewhere, cops use "gang" to sweep up anyone they want. In NY, if you wear any color on the color spectrum, you're gang involved. We've gone from "large gangs w/ well-defined leadership" to more than 800 small, loosely affiliated groups. Who'll wind up getting sued?
Suing people cops claim are in a "gang" won't prevent gun violence. What will it do? "Divert finite legal resources away from potentially effective violence reduction efforts [like] continuing to trace the origins of recovered crime guns & pushing for gun dealer accountability.”
Lori Lightfoot's "plan" to sue people cops claim are in a "gang," will further harm vulnerable communities: “The ordinance includes little protections to prevent, for example, a grandmother from being sued for her car after her grandson is pulled over while driving it.”
Chicago Mayor Lightfoot's plan to sue people cops claim are in a "gang" will not offer prosecutors any new tools: “State and federal laws give prosecutors ample power and legal mechanisms to seize assets associated with criminal activity.” It's a total waste.
The entire plan relies on "civil asset forfeiture." Legalized theft by the state. "Ripe for abuse." It raises civil liberties concerns & "offers little public safety value. It would be a step backward for Chicago after other jurisdictions have abandoned or reformed such tactics.”
Rather than wasting time on costly measures that undermine the effort to prevent/address gun violence, city leaders should focus on what works - investment in communities, education, and employment.
“Serious problems deserve serious solutions. This ordinance is not that.”
"Mayor Lori Lightfoot’s proposed Victims Justice Ordinance – which would authorize the City of Chicago to bring civil lawsuits against alleged gang members and the people around them, often unsuspecting family members — will not reduce gun violence." chicago.suntimes.com/2022/1/19/2289…
"Mayor Lori Lightfoot’s proposed Victims Justice Ordinance will not reduce gun violence. It will make intra-community violence worse by making poor communities poorer, making anti-violence workers’ jobs harder & further eroding police-community relations."chicago.suntimes.com/2022/1/19/2289…
More: "Mayor Lori Lightfoot’s plan to seize property from gang members is great if you like terrible ideas."chicagotribune.com/columns/rex-hu…
For more, please follow Cook County's Public Defender Office (@CookCoDefender). The latest is that in a recent hearing, no one spoke in favor of Mayor Lori Lightfoot's misguided plan.
THREAD: Mayor Eric Adams just announced he wants to kill NY bail reform. Cage 100000s more. Wants judges to try predicting "dangerousness."
Kalief Browder, symbol of need for change, would've been "dangerous." Rikers still would've killed him. More on dangers of "dangerousness:"
Allowing judges to try to predict "dangerousness" has never been legal in NY. For good reason. It is racist, flawed, & deeply dangerous. Caging someone pretrial based on a suspicion. On skewed data that'll replicate currently existing racial disparities. There is no crystal ball.
Since the 1970s, New York voters have intentionally and importantly decided to prohibit judges from jailing someone for months or even years because of a prediction of whether someone is dangerous based on nothing more than a judge’s suspicion.
THREAD: As more details emerge about NYPD officer Jason Rivera's tragic death, I'm thinking about whether police were the right ones to respond at all. A verbal argument between mom/son over food. What if mom had a different option than to call 911? More:nytimes.com/2022/01/22/nyr…
I'm thinking about Officer Rivera. Dead far too young. It wasn't his fault he was there. It was his "duty" under current system. 911 called. He was deployed. But why did he have to be there at all? If we allow ourselves to imagine different, perhaps no one would've been harmed.
The man who allegedly shot Officer Rivera had moved in to take care of his mom. After heart surgery. They argued a lot. Unclear whether different from other moms/sons living together. On this night, like others, they were arguing. About food (turns out he was a vegan she wasn't).
How fear spreads. In the midst of a misinformation campaign by police/prosecutors, this headline makes it sound like bail is to blame. Reality: Judges set over $100,000 bail on violent felony charges which weren’t close to being covered by bail reform.
It also appears as though the prosecution had yet to officially charge the underlying cases by securing an indictment or presenting sufficient evidence before grand jury. Both open cases appeared to be on track for dismissal.
Bail reform in NY represents exceptionally modest, commonsense change that only affects misdemeanors and non-violent felonies. If you’re charged w/ a violent felony, judges still maintain all their power to cage you on Rikers Island or other horrific, dangerous NY jails.
THREAD: This is what happens when reporters push past propaganda & report on truth. Chicago Tribune just exposed Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot. For lying about pretrial reform. The lies are calculated to scare her city into undermining reform. Here's how: chicagotribune.com/news/criminal-…
Chicago Mayor Lightfoot has a history of lies on justice. These most recent were in a letter to Chicago's Chief Judge. Demanded he deny electric monitoring for thousands. Chief Judge: "It's unconstitutional." Tribune: Letter's full of misleading lies. More:chicago.suntimes.com/2022/1/4/22867…
Chicago Tribune--not traditionally known for nuanced reporting on crime/justice is loud & clear: “[M]any of the claims & statistics in [Lightfoot’s] letter & repeated at a press conference earlier this month are misleading — & some are simply inaccurate.”
THREAD: This is a story about how police are frontline propagandists. It starts with a violent robbery at a men’s clothing store in Manhattan. It ends w/ NYPD responding, but refusing to investigate. Then lying that no one would face any consequences bc of “reform.” Read on:
A few weeks ago, a men's clothing store in Manhattan was victimized by numerous young men who, according the owners, stole $20,000 of merchandise. And worse: punched a 61 year old employee in the face. It was the second time the store had suffered similar theft recently.
The owners called NYPD both times. Both times NYPD came after the young men had left. The second time, however, one of the young men left his cell phone behind. Even apparently called it to retrieve it. The holy grail of evidence. A way for cops to catch them, right? Wrong.
The efforts by so-called “progressive” leaders from LA, SF, Chicago, & NYC to kill bail reform & expand policing is not about “public safety.” Best case it’s political pandering to police lies & propaganda. Worst: It’s to unnecessarily cage hundreds of thousands more people.
Chicago Tribune: Mayor Lori Lightfoot has brazenly lied to Chicagoans to cage more Black people. She cant be trusted. chicagotribune.com/news/criminal-…
LA Mayor Eric Garcetti—like “progressive” mayors in SF, NYC, & Chicago—has chosen to support the coordinated lie campaign by police against even modest changes *that are working* instead of telling residents the truth, standing proudly behind good policy.latimes.com/opinion/story/…