Share this page!

Alina Chan Profile picture
Twitter logo
Jan 24 • 17 tweets • 7 min read
The @WHO 2021 #OriginOfCovid study was not scientific. We don't need a repeat.

"Chinese counterpart eventually agreed to discuss the lab-leak theory in the report “on the condition we didn’t recommend any specific studies to further that hypothesis.”"
washingtonpost.com/world/2021/08/…
@WHO Troublingly, 5 out of 10 @WHO-convened international members of the 2021 team that signed off on the unscientific report is on the new SAGO team.
who.int/groups/scienti…
Countries cannot expect the @WHO SAGO effort to be a credible and thorough investigation of the #OriginOfCovid

Each country that cares about not having a pandemic happen again in the near future should initiate their own investigations free of competing interests.
In case your memory has faded, here are some highlights...

“Fabian Leendertz, a German.. member of the team.. said the team agreed to include the frozen food theory among its hypotheses “to respect, a bit, the findings” of the Chinese scientists.” nytimes.com/2021/02/12/wor…
Warning: this will offend people who have standards for what a scientific inquiry should look like.
"No agreement had been reached for China to provide the raw data by the time the WHO team left Wuhan this week, Dr. Dwyer said."

wsj.com/articles/china…
They trusted the Wuhan Institute of Virology's claims without asking for data/records or verification.
who.int/multi-media/de…

Science!
All trust, no verify.
Pure entertainment.
No regrets.
No one should be able to look at the above and think this was passable as a credible inquiry into the #OriginOfCovid

And yet we have top scientists and editors lauding the study and even Adobe'ing + re-publishing figures from this unscientific report.
thelancet.com/journals/lance…
Make that 2 top scientific journals now (Cell and Science) that have published papers by scientists, whose central figure used Adobe illustrator to reverse engineer a highly pixelated unverifiable figure with errors produced by the Chinese government…
Neither of these prestigious journals put up warnings or at least clarifications regarding the questionable figures they published.
As a result, scientists and readers who may not be very familiar with how the China-WHO joint study was conducted and how these figures were reverse engineered, can easily be mislead about the reliability of the figures and the interpretations/conclusions by these scientists.
Feel free to share the above thread if anyone suggests that the @WHO has done a good job investigating the #OriginOfCovid

They know there are errors in their report and figures, including the one reverse engineered, and still have not corrected these.
washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pac…
I feel like these mistakes could be understandable if they had been made by elementary school children.

But not by highly respected, fully grown and educated experts convened for an international @WHO study on one of the most important issues of our time.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Alina Chan

Alina Chan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Ayjchan

Alina Chan Profile picture
Jan 24
Many people ask, what is the direct evidence for a lab #OriginOfCovid

If anyone had produced direct evidence of a lab or a natural origin, do you think we'd still be arguing about it 2 years later?

We need an investigation because we need to search for this direct evidence.
What can be said is that a natural #OriginOfCovid has been investigated much more thoroughly than a lab origin, at least publicly.

And the 2-year search for an intermediate host or original animal source of SARS-CoV-2 has found not a shred of direct evidence for a market origin.
.@TheLancet @richardhorton1 writes: "Proponents of a laboratory leak have so far provided no evidence to undermine this [Huanan market origin] explanation."

He might be unaware that even pro-natural origin investigators have failed to find evidence...
thelancet.com/journals/lance…
Read 7 tweets
Alina Chan Profile picture
Jan 23
Because when everything you've done is above board, your legally FOIA'ed emails are massively redacted and the lead author of the Proximal Origin letter suddenly had ~5,000 of his tweets "auto-delete".
thetimes.co.uk/article/spectr…
And when you're not trying to cover up anything, you need to confer with the unacknowledged contributors to the paper as to how to explain the origin of Proximal Origin to journalists.
And when you're following the science, you need to stack the @WHO #OriginOfCovid group with your friends and put pressure on the group.
Read 4 tweets
Alina Chan Profile picture
Jan 22
Although a formal #OriginOfCovid investigation has yet to happen, it's good to reflect that scientific progress has been made.

1 year ago, experts were comparing me to QAnon and calling a lab accident, concealed to hide incompetence, a conspiracy theory.
nature.com/articles/s4159… Image
The hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 might have been genetically engineered was breathlessly compared to the US insurrection.

Afaik there has yet to be any evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was not genetically engineered...
On the other hand, we saw a deluge of documents released in late 2021 pointing to gain of function research + a 2018 roadmap for inserting novel cleavage sites into novel SARS-like viruses (this genetic engineering could've produced SARS-CoV-2). theintercept.com/2021/09/23/cor…
Read 6 tweets
Alina Chan Profile picture
Jan 22
An interview I did with @NathanJRobinson @curaffairs
"we have to start taking into account new risks & new sources of outbreaks. To not take steps to address this.. would be to put millions of lives at risk.. the old risks are real & so are the new risks"
currentaffairs.org/2022/01/how-di…
@NathanJRobinson @curaffairs On the gain of function debate, @NathanJRobinson pointed out that "someone’s gonna be proven right, and someone’s gonna be proven wrong... it’s the argument that some people have been making half their lives. So it’s all wrapped up in their identity."
I believe the above is the reason why, even though we can all broadly agree that the Covid-19 pandemic might've started due to a lab accident, so few public measures have been taken to make pathogen research more transparent or safe.
Read 6 tweets
Alina Chan Profile picture
Jan 19
Proximal Origin failed to acknowledge experts who convened its authors, made natural #OriginOfCovid arguments on Feb 1 call, and/or provided input on the work.

@Akselfrids asked @NatureMedicine if they were considering an addendum to Proximal Origin...
minervanett.no/politikk-begra…
"We do not at this time intend to come up with an addendum to the article... The journal is still open to assess a diversity of views on any issue... the publication of new solid research which, according to expert assessment, can help us understand the origin of the virus."
How many manuscripts arguing that a lab #OriginOfCovid is plausible has @NatureMedicine received and sent for peer review? May we at least have numbers of submissions, peer reviews, and rejections if the peer reviews themselves cannot be made public?
Read 10 tweets
Alina Chan Profile picture
Jan 19
"The entire clause that suggested that the WHO should have speedy access to disease outbreak sites has been removed – at the insistence of China"

In other words, let's repeat the devastating mistakes made this time round when the next pandemic occurs.
healthpolicy-watch.news/report-on-pand…
Countries that refuse to admit independent international investigators when an outbreak has been detected are putting the entire world at risk for another pandemic.

This is dangerously irresponsible, anti-scientific, and not a sign of technological or moral leadership.
We should not have a repeat of this:
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @Ayjchan has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @Ayjchan!

Read all threads by @Ayjchan

:(