Don't get me wrong, I think the situation with the Aboriginal Flag was the best possible outcome in the context. Sadly there will be consequences that none of you thought of, that some of us have been discussing for years. People just don't think things through. A thread.
Firstly, people demanded the flag be freed by the commonwealth acquiring it by financial or legal means. This result, what happened, gives power over our flag to the colonisers. Like I said, it was the only solution on offer but still far from perfect.
Secondly, those wanting to "free the flag" so that they and other mob can monetise it are not going to get what they think they are. They will not be able to compete with cheap knock-off products that will now be legal. You can't sell flag t-shirts for $40 anymore.
I can guarantee that cheap t-shirts made in the 3rd world (possibly using slave labour) with our flag on them will hit the market within weeks. Blak businesses who want to sell flag products will not be able to compete.
I predict that next year, on #InvasionDay, Aldi will sell Aboriginal flag towels, thongs, t-shirts and eskies. None of the earnings from this will go to mob, because the flag is now free to exploit. That's all that has happened.
Don't think that Blak businesses will be the ones doing this, because big business and countries with lower standards of living can out-compete any of us. It will not be our mob making the money from this, it will be EVERYBODY ELSE.
The "free the flag" movement was based on a lie that we were not allowed to use, wave, or identify with our flag. We always had the use of the flag but we were not allowed to monetise it without permission. We now can but so can EVERYBODY.
This is not the outcome you think it is. Now, for the rest of time, everybody but mob will earn money from the flag.

You shot us in the foot in the service of a lie.

The flag was always free to use.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Claire G. Coleman

Claire G. Coleman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @clairegcoleman

Jan 25
More on the flag. People keep giving Clothing the Gaps all the credit for the Flag thing. In reality CTG wanted the Commonwealth to compulsorily acquire the copyright without compensation to Harold Thomas.

I call that theft from an elder.
This is a matter of public record as part of the federal senate hearing that CTG and I both spoke at on opposite sides. CTG's stance, compulsory acquisition. My stance, fair payment to HT for his copyright. CTG are claiming credit for a deal they were trying to prevent.
You need to get this straight. CTG didn't want this deal to happen because they didn't want HT paid for his copyright. In reality the Commonwealth were working a deal already when the senate hearing began and their stance was that the hearings and CTG were jeopardizing the deal
Read 4 tweets
Jan 24
Breaking: Harold Thomas has signed over the copyright of the Aboriginal Flag to the Federal Government for a reasonable sum.

Royalties from use of the flag to to the NAIDOC committee.

$20m copyright buyout makes Aboriginal flag free for all afr.com/politics/feder…
I have always said, and have others, that the only correct result would be the government offering Mr Thomas an adequate payment for his copyright. Harold is happy with the deal so I am happy and so should we all.
And this: "Mr Thomas plans to use $2 million to establish an Australian Aboriginal Flag Legacy not-for-profit to make periodic disbursements aligned with interests of Aboriginal Australians and the flag." ... he's a great man.
Read 4 tweets
Nov 13, 2021
OK, I have read the who article now and I have to say that Michele misrepresented what actually happened. What she was burned for, deservedly, was her racist diatribe against a POC writer. Michele's behavior on twitter that night was disgraceful, she needs to take a step back.
It's not all about you Michele. BTW, when you are saying that an article in the Spectator gave you hope you have deeper problems than you think. You need to step back from your own tears and consider how you look. I promise you, I will not forget how you acted until you face up.
BTW, Michele, you tried to engage with me, while not engaging with the people you hurt at the time. I have receipts, I saved the emails as PDFs, I have screenshots somewhere, I can drag up if I need to.

At this point the only person who can stop you being burned is you.
Read 6 tweets
Nov 13, 2021
Who in the hell published this? Who thought it was OK to give a whole page to a white woman so she could pretend to be the victim, spray us with white woman's tears, when the entire literary world knows she was the aggressor.
I was there, dragging her in real time for her abuse of a woman of colour. I was there, making her admit it was her running the account. I was there, trying to put out the fire and trying to support her victims.

Yes, her victims.
There were not many WOC who could call her out without fear and I was one of them. She seemed unrepentant at the time, more scared than sorry, and I am sad to say she has not changed. Whoever published this shameful piece should be ashamed.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 4, 2020
When thinking about the Aboriginal flag and copyright and the desire of the government to intervene to overturn the copyright protections of the Aboriginal flag, owned by the flag's creator Harold Thomas, let us consider the case of Albert Namatjira. a thread.
Albert Namatjira was perhaps the first Aboriginal visual art superstar. Painting in the European watercolour star he quickly became a celebrity and was able, at the peak of this, to support huge numbers of close and distant family financially.
In 1957 he became the first Aboriginal person in the Northern Territory to become a full Australian citizen due, in part, to petitioning by non-Indigenous artists incensed by such a great artists being a ward of the state as all Aboriginal people were.
Read 20 tweets
Aug 20, 2020
I feel like I need to correct some misconceptions around the Aboriginal flag because NOBODY seems to know how this works. Copyright for the flag belongs to its designer Harold Thomas. He licensed it to WAM clothing for CLOTHING only. It's free for use for non-commercial use.
Flagworld possess the license to produce actual flags. People are free to use the flag for non-commercial use. Thomas CAN sue people using the flag against his wishes and has said he would stop racists and fascists from using it.

However, even the media and govt seem clueless.
WAM clothing don't "own" the copyright, they are licensed to use the design on clothing. If anyone says a wadjela company owns the Aboriginal flag they are lying. If people fear being sued for waving the Aboriginal flag they don't know how copyright works.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(