M. Johnson: Oh, what’s this? A cake.
Mme. Johnson: Yes, my love. Blow the candles.
M. Johnson: So it must be my birthday!
Mme. Johnson: Yes, it must be your birthday.
M. Johnson: And who are these people, wearing paper hats. And saying that I am a jolly good fellow?
Mme Johnson: They are in a meeting, mon cher.
M. Johnson: And who is this, our kitsch decorator?
Mme Johnson: Yes, whom we paid for ourselves (she winks).
M. Johnson: Did we?
Mme Johnson: (winks)
M. Johnson: Oh yes. We did. We did pay her ourselves. So, if this is a cake, and this is my birthday, and these people are in a meeting, and if our decorator is also in this meeting, then this must be…
Mme Johnson: A work event.
M. Johnson: A work event.
M. Cummings (passes through on a horse): I am the chief of the fire brigade. Are anyone’s pant on fire?
M. Johnson: Who was that?
Mme Johnson: He is on a work outing to Barnard Castle. Now, eat some cake my love. It’s on the Matters Arising.
An orator: (enters) I have arrived to announce government policy (on a large blackboard he slowly scrawls lines which, eventually, seemingly form the words ‘Angel Cake’).
A rhinoceros: (enters) I am the last human being. I will not capitulate.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
On this day in 1936, Artaud's boat, en route to Mexico, docked temporarily in North America. He took the opportunity to write and post a letter to his friend and publisher Jean Paulhan. #OTDArtaud 🧵
He uses notepaper headed 'la Cie Gel Transatlantique, French Line'. In this letter he informs Paulhan of the title he has decided for the compilation of letters and essays that he had deposited for publication before leaving France. It is to be called 'The Theatre and its Double'
'because if the theatre doubles life, then life doubles the true theatre, and that has nothing to do with Oscar Wilde’s ideas about art. This title speaks to all the doubles of the theatre that I have believed to have found throughout these years: metaphysics, plague, cruelty,
On this day in 1944, Roger Blin in Paris wrote a letter to his friend Antonin Artaud in the Rodez hospital in the south of France. Blin had been Artaud's assistant director on The Cenci project nine years before. #OTDArtaud 🧵
'My very dear Artaud, It is with great emotion that I learned from Anne Mason that you wish to see me. I unfortunately cannot travel to Rodez just now. I'm acting in a Norwegian play at the Vieux-Colombier... Believe that you are in my thoughts. Please forgive us what must seem
... like us abandoning you, though I call to you in my heart incessantly.' Artaud had asked after Blin and sought his address in letters to Anne Mason of 27 December and 4 January.
On this day in 1925, at the Réunion générale des Surréalistes, Antonin Artaud was nominated Director of the Bureau de recherches surréalistes. #OTDArtaud 🧵
'Notice: In order to pursue more direct, more effective action, it has been decided that from the 30 January the Bureau de recherches surréalistes will be closed to the public. Antonin Artaud from this time assumes the directorship of the bureau...
... A collection of focussed projects and demonstrations, which different committees are working on presently in collaboration with A. Artaud, will be published in the third edition of la Révolution Surréaliste.' According to Michel Leiris, Artaud then added a final sentence:
So, my employer @UniversityLeeds - without consultation with Senate, staff, union or learning and teaching committees - has decided it would be a good idea to add online discussion boards by default to all modules where students can post anonymously about the module.
Staff will be expected to reply to each and every message or query within 5 days. De facto additional workload, with no consultation
Now, this is a monumentally stupid idea, and it seems impossible that the decision could have been made by anyone who has ever taught, or that it should be made without consultation.
So, yesterday the Joint Expert Panel offered its first report on the #USS pension valuation. Here is an attempts at a ‘plain English’ account of what it says.
The history of the dispute up to the point at which the JEP was established is explained in a lengthy but plain English account here: leedsucu.org.uk/a-plain-englis…
The JEP report itself is written in very understandable way, and it is full with helpful appendices and clarifications. Nonetheless, my summary here is intended for those who feel overwhelmed by the detail of the history of the dispute, the various technical terms and so on