"The future of US-China relations hinges on the transformation of America's self-perception of its Cold War 'victory'" - Professor Zhang Yun of Niigata University with a fascinating short article on the old and new "Cold Wars".
Summary and excerpts:
1/11
Zhang believes that the "new Sino-US Cold War" theory is based on the US misperception of itself as the undisputed winner of the Cold War against the Soviet Union. For Sino-US relations to return to normal, it must make a paradigm shift.
2/
"The USSR could not resist the temptation to overreact militarily, ideologically, and diplomatically in response to the US military and propaganda provocations, and its military-enabled hegemony has resulted in a significant lag in social and economic development.
3/
"Thus, the disintegration of the USSR was primarily due to internal factors, rather than the success of US policy. China, on the other hand, began reforming in 1978 and pursued a non-ideological foreign policy of independence and peace in 1982, almost a decade before the USSR.
4/
"The disintegration of the Soviet Union was widely interpreted as an ideological victory for democracy over autocracy, upon which the US began to promote democracy around the world, primarily through economic sanctions and military intervention, the CW 'magic weapons'.
5/
"The wars in Kosovo, Afghanistan, and Iraq, on the other hand, demonstrated that the US 'magic weapons' don't work. Meanwhile, NATO's eastward expansion did not stabilize the post-Cold War European security order, but rather accelerated the US decline and regional insecurity.
6/
"And yet, these realities have not convinced the US that the 'Cold War victory" perception is an illusion; at the very least, it is unwilling to admit it."
7/
"Therefore, China's rapid rise has become a source of concern for the United States, which frequently appears to regard its previous relationship with China as a mistake.
8/
"Some argue that we would not be where we are now if the US had not allowed China to join the WTO so easily 20 years ago, but had instead required China to transform itself according to the American vision as a prerequisite.
9/
"However, such analysis is not only pointless but also unhealthy, because it is rooted in the 'Cold War victory' perception; it is based on the belief that China's development is somehow the result of US benevolence.
10/
"Following this logic, some Americans confronted with China's development will naturally turn to the Cold War toolbox for solutions, resulting in the emergence of a 'new Cold War' theory."
11/11
Link: aisixiang.com/data/131158.ht…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tuvia Gering 陶文亚

Tuvia Gering 陶文亚 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GeringTuvia

Jan 25
"PLA warplanes are tightening the noose around the neck of 'Taiwan independence'" - a Global Times editorial reacts to reports that the PLA has flown 39 aircrafts into Taiwan's air defense identification zone on Sunday, the largest sortie since October 2021.

Excerpts:
1/4
"The PLA's military planes have now become the norm, looming like a sword of Damocles over 'Taiwan independence' while taking concrete steps to back the mainland's warning and deterrence.
2/
"It is important to emphasize that there is no real distinction between PLA military aircraft over Taiwan and US military aircrafts over Hawaii. Taiwan is a part of China. The concept of "Taiwan airspace" has never existed. 'China airspace' is the only thing that exists.
3/
Read 5 tweets
Jan 25
"The battle of the major powers is not hand-to-hand combat, but a long-term competition for sustainable economic development and labor productivity" - Dr. Zhang Jiadong of Fudan University lists the "three cards" that the US plays to contain China and how to beat their hand.
1/15
According to Zhang, the first card is an attempt to morally isolate China. As exemplified in the first Democracy Summit in December, values are "one of the most useful tools" it has to rally its allies behind this goal.
2/
The second card aims to strategically contain China. It is consolidating traditional alliances (e.g., the Quad, the Indo-Pacific strategy) while also "innovating" new ones (AUKUS with Australia and the UK).
3/
Read 15 tweets
Jan 24
@BarakRavid reports that due to the political sensitivity, Israel coordinated with the US the holding of the Innovation Summit with China today (Monday). Washington made no objections. Details:
news.walla.co.il/item/3484816
1/7
According to a senior Israeli official, the early coordination was done to maintain transparency with the Biden administration, which is extremely sensitive to Chinese penetration of the Israeli economy.

2/
In recent weeks, Israel and the US have held private discussions about Israel's policy toward China, particularly American concerns about Chinese investments in Israeli infrastructure and the Israeli high-tech sector.

3/
Read 7 tweets
Jan 24
Heads up: tomorrow marks the 30th anniversary of China-Israel diplomatic relations, so look for Xi's blessing on the front page of People's Daily (really!). Meanwhile, Xinhua has a very positive story. Passing thoughts:
1/6
xinhuanet.com/english/202201…
- Officially, Israel is not a member of the BRI, but it is de facto. The initiative is touted in the title, while the new Haifa terminal port operated by state-owned SIPG is described as a "microcosm of the win-win cooperation under the China-proposed BRI."
2/
- Data dump: So far, over 30 Chinese enterprises are operating in Israel, creating around 10,000 jobs for Israel, figures from the Chinese embassy in Israel show.
/3
Read 6 tweets
Jan 18
Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Le Yucheng today: "It's past time you woke up from your century-old imperial fantasies!"

Full translated transcript from the website of the PRC's Ministry of Foreign Affairs below:
1/
"In a keynote speech at Renmin University's annual Macro Situation Forum on January 18, 2022, Vice Foreign Minister Le Yucheng said that some people in the US have been hyping the 'Chinese diplomatic assertiveness theory' nonstop and have even labeled us as "coercive diplomats"2/
"But, then again, how has the US treated China? It has designated China as its 'most serious competitor,' suppressing it with no regard for the bottom line [i.e. w/ no discretion], interfering in its internal affairs, and infringing on its core interests.
3/
Read 8 tweets
Jan 16
"Dealing with China's own domestic security and stability is not enough; we must help others with similar threats and challenges " - For some pundits, such as Fudan's Shen Yi, the notion that Kazakhstan's popular uprising was a US-backed "color revolution" is unequivocal.
1/8 Image
Excerpts: "The West deploys a network of color revolutions and NGOs to unleash a multitude of forces.
2/
"However, this network is not securely and monopolistically [sic] controlled by Washington and London elites, for whom the imagined penetration of such networks by terrorist organizations may have a considerably greater influence than they believe.
3/
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(