sonch Profile picture
Jan 25 10 tweets 2 min read
It’s weird how I *believe* these things to be true and yet just carry on with day to day stuff like they do not represent historically-significant crimes requiring justice:

1. The pandemic that has killed millions was caused by research supported & funded by Anthony Fauci
2. The lockdown-based response of Western governments to the pandemic was deliberately planted and promoted by Chinese propaganda and embraced by our selfish/gullible elites either for personal motives or pure mindless elite-copycat behavior
3. Prominent among the motives for embracing and promoting the hysteria response that they did, including things like continually mandating masks, was the temporal proximity of the US election and desire to defeat Donald Trump
4. Each and every reversal or rollback of any of these policies is feverishly resisted by a faction not out of sincere belief in any scientific or epidemiological necessity, but for face-saving political posturing.
5. The fact that all of the above has damaged a generation of children, stealing years of their childhoods, and sets up the prospect for at least half of them a childhood of perpetual dystopia, does not figure at all into the calculations of the people described in 3-4.
That’s just weird.

Again, to be clear: the preceding are merely my *beliefs*. (You know: ‘allegedly’.) I am not making an actual accusation here. Just stating an opinion.

Anyway, have a nice Tuesday! Stay safe & up your mask game.
Just a side note 4a:

I don’t believe anyone in position of responsible decisionmaking sincerely believes school/childcare kid-masking rules are of any importance epidemiologically. (I’m excluding morons like Randi Weingarten)

It is all optics.
These people don’t treat these rules/mandates as if they genuinely believe they will affect actual epidemic results. They treat them as if their primary concern is to manage public relations, and to engineer bureaucratic rule-sets about things like staffing.
All talk of climbdown/off-ramps from kid-mask rules proceeds in this dry, technocratic voice, exactly analogous to Federal Reserve Board members discussing how best to roll off the SOMA balance sheet so as not to spook markets. No rush! Gotta be careful, savvy. Make powerpoints.
Meanwhile, millions of kids are spending their formative years, building all their schoolage memories, practicing their social interactions (or not), pointlessly wearing ‘masks’ all day whenever around peers.

And these asshole mask technocrats with their ‘guidances’ DGAF

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with sonch

sonch Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @soncharm

Jan 26
FROM HERE: Biden should nominate a generic D-style replacement to sit on the Supreme Court, & then Rs should have an absolute hissy-fit, look up that person's high school yearbook, team up with some DoJ employees to gin up a false 35-year-old accusation based on someone's memoir,
have loud protests where they occupy the steps of the Supreme Court building and climb statuary and pound on the front doors, say in large numbers that the person nominated 'looks like' someone they disliked or who bothered them in high school, say that the FBI should 'investigat
e' a drinking party some now-upper middle class types say that they had with the nominee in college, spend hours of research and 9000-word Atlantic pieces decoding some slang they say was used in the aforementioned high school yearbook,
Read 12 tweets
Jan 20
It’s pretty funny that the entirety of US society - regulators, academia, pundits, businesses, vendors - are barreling ahead with embedding ‘upping your mask game’ into our society & economy, and meanwhile, the UK is just like ‘nah, that’s enough, no more masks’
Somewhere, scattered across this great nation, in institutes of higher learning, are about 13,000 social science, econ, biomedicine grad students planning to do their thesis or next paper on ‘masks’

UK: nah, we’re done
In various little podunk towns and counties are countless ‘Health Officers’ who are doing the ‘work’ they do of reading CDC ‘guidance’ PDFs and then opening a fresh word doc to craft the Nth update to their own ‘guidance’, and it’s like 97% centered on ‘masks’

UK: nah
Read 6 tweets
Jan 5
Remember to tell everyone you know to ‘up your mask game’. Because that’s a phrase you totally thought of completely by yourself and not something you’re repeating because you saw it on the TV or perhaps a social media posted clip of something on the TV
guys, it's time to step your mask game up

Read 34 tweets
Jan 5
DON’T LOOK UP (2021) was ok. But not as a ‘climate change allegory’. As a quirky character study of the DiCaprio and especially the Jennifer Lawrence character. They were just funny to watch in all those situations.
The movie itself, despite being ‘timely’ and I have no doubt meant as some blunt allegory about ‘climate change’ in our ‘social media’ ‘politicized’ ‘divided’ ‘post truth’ era, comes across as weirdly dated. Felt like something from the late 90s. And just cuz of DEEP IMPACT.
*not just cuz of
Read 9 tweets
Jan 4
The 2020 debates between Covid-Taliban and ‘floomers’ who argued for less restrictions on grounds that its severity was kinda sorta ‘just the flu’ looks pretty absurd in retrospect now during our current regime of (partial/localized) Covid-Taliban’ing against ‘omicron’, a cold
Maybe it was wrong to minimize Wuhan Classic, and liken it to ‘just the flu’. Maybe the tradeoff/balance weighed in favor of restrictions.

But now we have Wuhan-South Africa, which is uniformly *much less severe*. And still the Covid Taliban *wants to do all the same things*.
Imagine Wuhan Classic hadn’t existed and it had been Wuhan-South Africa that emerged in 2020. You know, a cold that spreads fast and everyone gets, then they’re done.

Would ‘closing schools’, ‘vaccine passports’ in response to it have even been on the table?
Read 4 tweets
Jan 2
Covid restrictions, to the degree that they actually ‘work’, could be increasing severity/death in the US, if their net-effect is to slow down ‘omicron’ from viral-competing away ‘delta’, meaning ‘delta’ remains prevalent longer, to infect more people. Just saying: could be.
For any given uninfected person, whether their next-exposure to a Wuhan-like virus is ‘omicron’ or ‘delta’ is a random variable X. ‘Covid measures’ ‘working’ could mean the omicron wavefront reaches them later, tilting the odds toward X = delta. Which is bad for them.
This effect could actually be material given the reported ability of an omicron infection to provide some immunity to delta; if so it *really matters*, net-outcome-wise, whether your next exposure/infection is one or the other. It’s not symmetric.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(