Jan 1, 2015, through June 1, 2020, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill reported 28 lab incidents involving genetically engineered organisms to safety officials at NIH according to docs UNC released to ProPublica under a public records request.
6 incidents involved various types of lab-created coronaviruses. Many were engineered to allow study of virus in mice. UNC declined to answer questions about incidents & to disclose details to the public, including names of viruses, nature of modifications & risks posed to public
August 2015: Mouse briefly escaped inside 1 of UNC’s biosafety level 3 labs. Mouse, which had been infected with an undisclosed type of “mouse adapted” virus, squirmed free of researcher’s gloved hand.
NIH officials told ProPublica it was a type of “SARS-associated Coronavirus.”
October 2015: 3 UNC researchers potentially exposed to undisclosed “mouse adapted” virus when shallow container fell to the floor of a biosafety level 3 lab, spilled & potentially created aerosolized droplets. NIH told ProPublica incident involved type of SARS-assoc. coronavirus.
November 2015: 2 UNC lab workers potentially exposed to a lab-created type of MERS coronavirus when an empty cage w/ contaminated animal bedding spilled on floor of biosafety level 3 lab. Researcher transferring MERS-infected mice to clean cage when the dirty cage knocked over.
February 2016: A mouse infected with an undisclosed “mouse adapted” virus bit a researcher’s finger through two layers of gloves as she tried to weigh it in a biosafety level 3 lab. NIH officials told ProPublica that the incident involved a type of SARS-associated coronavirus.
April 2017: Plate containing virus from lung samples from mouse infected with undisclosed virus was dropped by researcher in biosafety level 3 lab, spilling small amount of virus material onto incubator door & floor. NIH told ProPublica it was type of SARS-associated coronavirus.
April 2020: UNC scientist underwent 14 days of self-quarantine at home after mouse bite caused potential exposure to strain of SARS-CoV-2, virus that causes COVID-19, that had been adapted for growth in mice.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Joint Artificial Intelligence Center (JAIC) at US Department of Defense (DoD) assembled leading tech companies, including Amazon, Microsoft, IBM, Dell, & Esri, under Project Salus. (Salus is the Roman goddess of health & well-being.)
Digital health innovation company Humetrix was brought in to analyze data about older individuals & others who are most at risk for severe COVID-19 & to build a dashboard to present results in an easy-to-interpret visual format. But getting that data was going to be a challenge.
I've had lots of interactions with physicians, nurses, & techs in different hospitals & medical practices past few years, both for myself & w/ family. Most of these people don't care about any of us. They forget all about you when you walk out the door.
They don't call back with test results, if you are lucky enough to get them to even order tests. They don't refer you to specialists, even though the doctor says you need to see one. They just don't seem to care. This has been my experience for most life.
Why are these kinds of people working in health care? Look how most refuse to even treat people with Covid. It doesn't surprise me after everything else I've seen. Why do some many patients accept all this as "normal"?
“All of you, yes, I know you’re vaccinated, you’re the smart ones, but you know there’s people out there who aren’t listening to God & what God wants. You know who they are.”
NY Governor said that “God wants” people to be vaccinated—& that those who disagree are not listening to “organized religion” or “everybody from the Pope on down.”
2017:
FDA "under pressure from Trump admin to approve drugs faster, but researchers at Yale School of Medicine found nearly 1/3 of those approved from 2001 through 2010 had major safety issues yrs after medications were made widely available to patients."
"Seventy-one of the 222 drugs approved in the 1st decade of the millennium were withdrawn, required a "black box" warning on side effects or warranted a safety announcement about new risks".
This was reported in JAMA in 2017, & the study included safety actions through Feb. 28.
"took a median of 4.2 years after drugs were approved for these safety concerns to come to light, study found, & issues were more common among psychiatric drugs, biologic drugs, drugs that were granted "accelerated approval" & drugs that were approved near regulatory deadline".