Frances 'Cassandra' Coppola Profile picture
Jan 27, 2022 11 tweets 4 min read Read on X
SEC has denied Cboe BZX Exchange's request to approve its Bitcoin ETF proposal, saying it has not been able to prove that it would not be used for fraudulent purposes.
There appears to be a fundamental difference of opinion. BZX claims that Bitcoin's market cannot be manipulated. The SEC thinks it can.
And not only that Bitcoin's market can be manipulated, but that there is significant evidence of actual manipulation and fraud.
Hilariously, BZX's registration document fatally undermined its own argument.
Didn't it occur to them that the SEC might look askance at an ETF proposal whose own risk assessment said the trading platforms for its assets were unregulated, opaque, prone to fraud and security breaches, attractive to hackers and lacked basic protections?
You couldn't make this up.
Index methodology, totally resistant to fraud and manipulation.... 🤣🤣🤣
"Although the Sponsor raises concerns regarding fraud and security of bitcoin platforms in the Registration Statement, the Exchange does not explain how or why such concerns are consistent with its assertion that the Index is resistant to fraud and manipulation."
The full quote is even more entertaining. Their NAV calculation relies entirely on price feeds from platforms that they know might be manipulated and fraudulent. There are no proposals for risk management or mitigation.
So then BZX tries and fails to convince the SEC that the CME Bitcoin futures market is sufficiently large and significant for a surveillance-sharing agreement to mitigate the risk of manipulation and fraud in the spot market....
This didn't help

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Frances 'Cassandra' Coppola

Frances 'Cassandra' Coppola Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Frances_Coppola

Sep 9
This is idiotic. The hostages are in Gaza. Israel controls all movement of goods and people in and out of Gaza, and its military campaign creates serious risks for NGO staff. Clearly Israel must consent to allow Red Cross staff into Gaza and make it safe for them to do so. We identified only one BBC editorial reference to the Red Cross failing to visit hostages, and remarkably the BBC appeared to equally place the blame on Israel . The article reported that the Red Cross have been: “asking to visit the hostages, deliver medicalsupplies, and bring newsto desperate families. None of that can happen unless both Hamas and Israel agree”.  The suggestion that access to the Hostages is reliant on Israeli consent seems baseless.
This is idiotic too. The reason the BBC (and other news organisations) preface "Gaza health ministry" with "Hamas-run" is to issue a content warning on the information provided by the health ministry, not to validate Hamas. The BBC frequently refers to the Hamas ‘run’ or ‘controlled’ Gaza Health Ministry. We have found:  a) 593 mentions of Hamas within 10 words of ‘health’ and ‘ministry’ (in other words, 4.8% of all mentions of Hamas); and b) 440 of the BBC items mention Hamas within 10 words of ‘health’ and ‘ministry’ (in other words, 29.3% of all items mentioning Hamas).  Thus, Hamas is more likely to be referred to in connection with a Health Ministry than as a ‘proscribed terrorist organisation’.
I really don't know where to start with this ludicrous piece of analysis. The ages of casualties is factual reporting, as are family relationships if known. Reporting child deaths does of course evoke sympathy, but that's not a reason not to report them.


Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 11 tweets
Sep 4
I am reminded of them every time I enter @RochesterCathed and see the shadows of the paintings that were hacked off the walls, plastered over or whitewashed, and the banner in the Quire listing the Bishops of Rochester that starts with John Fisher and ends with Nicholas Ridley.
John Fisher was executed by Henry VIII for refusing to recognise him as head of the Church in England and opposing his marriage to Anne Boleyn. He is a Saint in the Roman Catholic Church.
Nicholas Ridley was burned at the stake by Henry's daughter Mary for denying the Roman Catholic doctrine of transubstantiation. He is one of the "Oxford Martyrs" of the Church of England.
Read 11 tweets
Aug 28
There can be no private sector solution to the crisis engulfing water companies that does not involve very large increases in customer bills. Nationalise them.
These companies provide a finite resource to a restricted population. Their revenue comes almost entirely from customer payments. The idea that shareholders can have high returns AND customers low bills necessarily means inadequate investment and/or unsustainable debt.
For over thirty years, water companies and regulators shut their eyes to the long-term impossibility of delivering high returns to shareholders while keeping customer bills low. But now the wheels are coming off.
Read 5 tweets
Aug 27
Blimey. And you thought Thames Water was complicated. This is Southern Water. Topco (Greensands Holdings Ltd) is registered in Jersey. Image
That strange arrangement at the bottom of the chart is a Whole Business Securitisation similar to that in Thames Water. And as with Thames Water, there is external debt in the parasitical extractive structure built on top of the regulated utility.
Here's a helpful table explaining the purpose of each level in this structure, along with how it has changed since Ofwat stomped on it in 2022 (closed down its Cayman SPVs, basically, though it doesn't explicitly say this here) Image
Read 16 tweets
Aug 19
I watched the BBC Storyville documentary about Yosef Weitz again last night. Interesting detail I missed the first time: clip of an Israeli academic saying that Ben-Gurion commissioned an academic research paper to "prove" that Palestinians chose to leave in 1948... 1/
... he emphasised that Ben-Gurion didn't want genuine academic research to find out the reasons why Palestinians left, he wanted an academic paper to support his story that Palestinians freely chose to leave and were not driven out by the IDF. Astonishing. /2
I have been told this story many times by Israeli accounts. I found it hard to believe, because it seemed inconsistent with what I was reading about Zionist military action in 1948. People fleeing in fear of their lives seemed much more likely. /3
Read 14 tweets
Aug 6
I read their amicus brief and can summarise it thus:

"We talked to our friends in the IDF and they told us the charges were unfounded".
The same group produced a report on the 2014 Gaza war. embassies.gov.il/MFA/FOREIGNPOL…
The report concluded:
"Israel’s efforts were entirely necessary and justified in the defence of that country’s national security. Israel’s conduct in the 2014 Gaza Conflict met and in some respects exceeded the highest standards we set for our own nations’ militaries."
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(