SEC has denied Cboe BZX Exchange's request to approve its Bitcoin ETF proposal, saying it has not been able to prove that it would not be used for fraudulent purposes.
There appears to be a fundamental difference of opinion. BZX claims that Bitcoin's market cannot be manipulated. The SEC thinks it can.
And not only that Bitcoin's market can be manipulated, but that there is significant evidence of actual manipulation and fraud.
Hilariously, BZX's registration document fatally undermined its own argument.
Didn't it occur to them that the SEC might look askance at an ETF proposal whose own risk assessment said the trading platforms for its assets were unregulated, opaque, prone to fraud and security breaches, attractive to hackers and lacked basic protections?
You couldn't make this up.
Index methodology, totally resistant to fraud and manipulation.... 🤣🤣🤣
"Although the Sponsor raises concerns regarding fraud and security of bitcoin platforms in the Registration Statement, the Exchange does not explain how or why such concerns are consistent with its assertion that the Index is resistant to fraud and manipulation."
The full quote is even more entertaining. Their NAV calculation relies entirely on price feeds from platforms that they know might be manipulated and fraudulent. There are no proposals for risk management or mitigation.
So then BZX tries and fails to convince the SEC that the CME Bitcoin futures market is sufficiently large and significant for a surveillance-sharing agreement to mitigate the risk of manipulation and fraud in the spot market....
This didn't help
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"In the absence of major initiatives to tackle barriers to employment, including subtle discrimination by employers, the Government’s proposed changes would simply result in higher unemployment among sick and disabled people as more of them were deemed capable of work..."
"And even for those who find work, the benefit cuts are likely to mean a vast increase in poverty.
Sick and disabled people do not deserve such harsh treatment..."
"The Green Paper’s vision of (almost) everyone working instead of living on benefits is pie in the sky. The Government must think again."
I did a better chart. PIP/DLA claimants by age group, split by those scoring 4 points in 1 or more daily living activity and those scoring less than 4 points in all daily living activities. Figures from a DWP FOI response kindly provided by Paul Bivand.
Why the 4 points/less than 4 points split? Because the Government proposes to remove PIP from those who score less than 4 points on all ten daily living activities. Those are the people in the red bars on the chart.
There seems to be a widespread belief that the Government's reform of PIP is intended to encourage young people with disabilities to find work. This is despite the fact that PIP is not an out-of-work benefit.
"Mr Trump has... continued his condemnations of the Iranian government and now abandoned the nuclear arms agreement with that nation - citing, in part, evidence presented by Mr Netanyahu."
The White House's statement issued on 8th May 2018 says:
"Intelligence recently released by Israel provides compelling details about Iran's past secret efforts to develop nuclear weapons."
Goes on to make several allegations about both JCPOA and Iran. trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-stat…
We now know that ending JCPOA made it impossible for the IAEA to surveil and monitor Iran's nuclear programme. Its report of 28th May says that it no longer has any idea what Iran is doing. iaea.org/sites/default/…
If you want to understand Thames Water's convoluted corporate structure and those controversial dividends, Coppola Comment's in-depth analysis from last year covers it in detail. Now free to read. The link to the post is in the next tweet. 👇
The too-important-to-fail public utility is embedded in a parasitical extractive structure (see image below). The Kemble group of companies is insolvent and has been for quite some time.
The dividends that broke Ofwat's rules, and for which Thames Water has now been fined, weren't paid to external shareholders. They have not received dividends since 2017. coppolacomment.substack.com/p/thames-water…
First, let's backtrack to Pope Francis's election. He chose his papal name in honour of St. Francis of Assissi. St. Francis is my patron saint, so I know a bit about him. 1/
St. Francis had a devoted disciple and close companion, who witnessed his stigmata and nursed him in his last illness. His name was Brother Leo. 2/
I wrote a post documenting the deaths by fire in Gaza, and observed that this meets the dictionary definition of "holocaust". Predictably, someone on Substack notes accused me of antisemitism. *sigh* /1
True, I didn't mention Oct 7th. I've covered it in previous pieces, so didn't think I needed to discuss it again. But he insisted that Oct 7th must feature in every piece about the Gaza conflagration. He accused me of "bad editorial practice" for omitting it. 2/
And because I dared to use the word "holocaust" (without capitalization and with an indefinite article) about the Gaza conflagration, and called the evil men responsible (on both sides) the "spawn of Moloch", he accused me of "conjuring older tropes". 3/