Kamil Galeev Profile picture
Jan 27, 2022 56 tweets 18 min read Read on X
The second cluster of ethnic republics in Russia is Idel-Ural or Volga-Ural region, shaped by Volga river and Ural mountains. 'Volga' is the Slavic name of the great river, 'Idel' is Turkic one. So the term you choose can reflect your identity and political affiliation (thread) Image
While the North Caucasus is a mosaic of myriads of cultures, languages and ethnicities, ethnic situation in Idel-Ural is somewhat simpler. Before the Russian (red) conquest there were two big ethnic groups here - Turks (shades of green), and Finno-Ugrics (everyone else)
Of course, it's more nuanced than that. To start with, Tatars and Bashkirs speak mutually intelligible Turkic languages, which can be even considered the dialects of one - Kipchak language. Tatars and Bashkirs are Kipchak-speaking Sunni Muslims
With Chuvashs it's more tricky. Let's look at the map of Turkic languages in Eurasia. You see big groups: Oghuz (Turks, Azeri, Turkmen), (Uzbek, Uyghur), Kipchak (Tatar, Bashkir, Kazakh, Kyrghyz), Siberian (Yakut, Altai, Tuva, Hakas). And a lonely purple dot. That's Chuvashia
Chuvash are alone and isolated in a sense that Chuvash language is the last living tongue of the Bulghar-Oghur family. Which used to be prominent in the past, but then mostly died away. It's the last relict of Old Great Bulgaria (I'll return to this later)
Now let's talk of Finno-Ugrics. 'Mordva' people are a Russian invention in a sense that they never considered themselves one people. They are two separate people - Erzya and Moksha. They are called 'Mordva' largely because Russian didn't see much difference anyway
In the past space habituated by the Erzya and Moksha (as well as other Finnics) was waaaay larger than now. For example, names of Ryazan and Arzamas are both refer to Erzya. They were both Russian forts built in what was back then Erzya territory
Mari people also have been historically divided to two groups - Hill Mari living on the higher right bank of Volga and Meadow Mari living on the left . Why does current Mari El Republic lie on the left bank? Well, because Hill Mari are almost completely assimilated by Russians
Does it mean all Mari live in their republic? No. The strip of their settlement stretches eastward with a big cluster in Bashkortostan. Actually those Maris in Bashkortostan are considered to preserve their culture and religion in the most authentic form
Maris are probably the last authentic pagans in Europe.
Worshipping trees
And sacrificing geese to their deities
This is a sacred wood where the worshipping takes place. While further to the West communist regimes were destroying churches, mosques, synagogues, in this region Soviets were cutting down the sacred woods - even in the 1960-1970s, as a fight against religion
A sign tells 'Kusoto prayer site'
A prayer
A priest. Wool hats - a sign of presthood
Now let's go deeper in history. In the early Middle Ages all or nearly all of the population of the Idel-Ural region was Finno-Ugric. Some speculate there were some Turks or even Balts, but not much remained from them
Deep south on the Black Sea shore there was a strong confederation of nomadic Turks - Great Bulgaria
They reached the peak of their might under Khan Kubrat. Before his death Kubrat assembled his sons. He broke a branch and then asked them to break a big bundle. Nobody could. You see said Kubrat, if you stick together nobody will break you. But you can be easily broken one by one
He wanted them to stand together. They did not. Five sons of Kubrat divided his horde to five smaller hordes. Some of them were destroyed by Khazars. But two survived. Third son of Kubrat Asparukh led his horde do Danube and founded the Danube Bulgaria, which is independent now
While Kubrat's second son Kotrag led his horde northeast to the middle Volga and settled there. His descendants established Volga Bulgaria
It would be wrong to consider the Volga Bulgaria a Bulgar ethnostate. Not true at all. It was rather a loose tribal federation where Bulgars were a dominant tribe. The federation included various Turkic tribes, Magyars (not all made it to Pannonia) but majority were Finnic
In 922 Bulgaria converts to Islam. Inb Fadhlan, the envoy of the Abbasid Caliph comes all the way to Bulgaria and eltabar (the king) accepts the Message of Muhammad from his hands. Btw I recommend reading Inb Fadhlan's memories - they're an invaluable source on the region and era
Very soon Bulgaria becomes a major urban and commercial power
Geography helped a lot. As you see, Bulgaria sits right on the Volga way which connects Middle East (specifically Greater Iran) with northern forests, Baltic and ultimately with Europe
Which meant that the price difference between the regions Bulgaria had access two was enormous. Some of the most precious export goods for the Muslim world included furs and slaves
Bulgaria had two main adversaries. One was Russian principalities. An interesting case from Lavrentyevskaya Chronicle. When Prince of Kiev Vladimir the Red Sun (the one who accepted Christianity) launched an expedition against Bulgaria, his forces captured a bunch of Bulgarians
But Vladimir's uncle Dobrynya looked at the captives and said 'They are all in leather boots. They are not gonna pay us tribute. Let's go look for people wearing lapti'
Lapti were a cheap shoes from the tree barks. Who wears them? Simple people - the one who are supposed to be paying tribute to those stronger than them
Of course Russian continued their attacks. This for example is Church of the Intercession on the Nerl - built by the prince of Vladimir Andrei Bogolubskii in memory of his son who was killed during a raid on Volga Bulgaria
Another major adversaries of Bulgaria were Turkic nomads who called themselves Kipchaks. Russian called them Polovtsy (половцы) and Europeans - Cubans
Their area of settlement. They are called here 'a state' but that's incorrect. They were rather many hordes led by many independent khans. They were just culturally similar, but not politically united
Kipchaks constantly raided Bulgaria - and Russian principalities. Both wars were extremely brutal and bloody. But - unlike Bulghars - Russian princes constantly married Kipchak women
As a result by the times of Mongol invasion Russian princes were mostly Kipchak by blood. You can look at the Gerasimov's reconstruction of facial features of Andrei Bogolubski, considered to be the founder of Russian absolute monarchy
As a result Russian princes and Kipchaks often united for combined assault on Bulgaria which made the situation far more complicated for them. And then - in 13th c - Mongols arrived
Mongols crushed every single power in the region and submitted them all to the Mongol empire. But its unity was short lived. Very soon descendants of Chinghis Khan divided his empire to independent khanates one of which is now called the 'Golden Horde'
Ofc it's completely ahistorical. Nobody called them the Golden Horde back then. The official name of the state was 'Ulus Juchi', the fief of Yuchi. Juchi was the eldest son of Chinghis Khan. The father granted him all the lands westward 'to the last sea'. Juchi never ruled them
Juchi died before his father, perhaps killed by Chinghis Khan who never liked him, suspecting he was not his biological child. Juchi was probably a biological son of Chinghis Khan's merkit enemy who abducted his wife and Chinghis Khan only later managed to get her back
But Juchi's sons lived. And after Chinghis Khan's death Mongol nobility decided that they should have their share of the pie. So the point of the entire western expedition 'to the last sea' was to create a kingdom where Juchi's heirs could rule. That's why - Ulus Juchi
Unofficial name however was Desht-i-Kipchak, the Steppe of Kipchaks. Why? There were never many Mongols there, most of the Mongol army returned back to Central Asia immediately. So the demographic majority of the steppe were Kipchaks who quickly assimilated their conquerors
In 1352 after the assassination of Khan Janibek The Desht-i-Kipсhak enters the civil war, lasting decades. After the Kulikovo Battle it was temporarily united by Khan Tuktamysh who was however reckless enough to quarrel with Tamerlane
So Tamerlane entered the Desht-i-Kipchak and meticulously destroyed its every single city one by one, massacring the population. The country never really recovered. In 1382 it was still strong enough to bring Moscow into submission, but after 1400s - not anymore
Bulgaria also never really recovered. Its cities - Bulghar, Bilar, Suvar were burnt to ashes and people killed or enslaved. Culture also changed. After 1400 Bulgar language disappears from tombstones completely. Now all grave inscriptions were written in Kipchak
It seems that not the Mongol but rather Tamerlane's invasion brought the break with prior tradition. Mongols aimed to create new kingdom. Tamerlane didn't intend to conquer - he simply burnt everything to the ground. Old Bulgarian cities laid in ruins and were never reconstructed
Instead new city boomed out of almost nothing. It was Kazan. Kazan was a small, unimportant border fortress under Bulghars but now it literally skyrocketed in population and importance. Why? Why did people flock here instead of rebuilding their old cities? Let's look at the map
If you look at the google maps, you can see that Kazan stands on Volga. That's true - for now. But it wasn't true back then
The level of Volga rose very much in the 20th c. Because under the Soviets both Volga and Kama were blocked by huge hydroelectric dams. So now Volga is not really a river. It's now a system of lakes. That changed climate, killed biodiversity
In the bygone age, when Volga used to be a river, it had a lot of fish. Including big fish. See beluga (a sturgeon) from a Kazan Museum caught in 1902. It had around 100 kgs of black caviar. No such fish anymore - dams killed everything
Before the dams raised the level of the water, Kazan did not stand on Volga. It stood on Kazan river and was in 7 kms away from Volga. 7 kms of swampy terrain. A black line below is the only paved road built to connect the city with the Volga bank through this swamp
And this is why Kazan boomed in the 15th c as the new center. Old cities of Desht-i-Kipchak and Bulgaria they all lied on Volga bank. It's sort of cool - easier communications, easier commerce. But it's cool only when it's safe, when a strong empire guarantees security
When the empire crumbles, living by the big river is a liability. The river ofc brings good guys, but it also brings bad guys. River pirates who go from one town to another burning and pillaging. So in times of danger and chaos better live in a bit more isolated location
So, the access to water communications are both asset and liability. In our age of safety and comfort we sort of forgot of it. But ancient people living in more brutal age knew it very well. Virgil prophesied the future Golden Age where there will be no navigation anymore
The Book of Revelation also promises that the new Earth cleansed from all sin is not gonna have any seas
So to ancient authors the sea connecting everyone to everyone including to the guys would prefer not to connect with was kinda problematic. But the same can be said about any water communication system especially so enormous as Volga
In times of danger and chaos the river is full of predators. So the best option you have is to live a bit off of it. Close enough to enjoy most of the profits, but far enough to have some protection against the pirates. And that's why in times of chaos Kazan rises out of nothing
End of thread. The new thread dealing with the post-Horde history will be started on Monday

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kamil Galeev

Kamil Galeev Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kamilkazani

Mar 22
In August 1999, President Yeltsin appointed his FSB Chief Putin as the new Prime Minister. Same day, he named him as the official successor. Yet, there was a problem. To become a president, Putin had to go through elections which he could not win.

He was completely obscure.Image
Today, Putin is the top rank global celebrity. But in August 1999, nobody knew him. He was just an obscure official of Yeltsin's administration, made a PM by the arbitrary will of the sovereign. This noname clerk had like 2-3% of popular support

Soon, he was to face elections Image
By the time of Putin's appointment, Russia already had its most favoured candidate. It was Primakov. A former Yeltsin's Prime Minister who broke with Yeltsin to contest for power. The most popular politician in Russia with massive support both in masses and in the establishment. Image
Read 20 tweets
Mar 17
In Russia, the supreme power has never ever changed as a result of elections. That simply never happened in history. Now that is because Russia is a (non hereditary) monarchy. Consequently, it doesn't have any elections. It has only acclamations of a sitting rulerImage
Obviously, there has been no elections of Putin in any meaningful sense. There have been only acclamations. And that is normal. His predecessor was successfully acclaimed with an approval rate of about 6%. Once you got the power, you will get your acclamation one way or another
Contrary to the popular opinion, Russia doesn't have any acclamation ("election") problem. It has a transition of power problem. Like Putin can get acclaimed again, and again, and again. But sooner or later, he dies. What next?
Read 7 tweets
Mar 16
My team has documented the entire Russian missile manufacturing base. That is 28 key ballistic, cruise, hypersonic and air defence missile producing plants associated with four corporations of Roscosmos, Almaz-Antey, Tactical Missiles and Rostec

The link is in the first comment Image
Our report How Does Russia Make Missiles? is already available for download



By the next weekend, we will be publishing the first OSINT sample, illustrating our methodology & approach. The rest of our materials will be made available laterrhodus.comImage
Key takeaways:

1. Missile production is mostly about machining
2. You cannot produce components of tight precision and convoluted geometry otherwise
3. Soviet missiles industry performed most of its machining manually

That was extremely laborious and skill-intensive processImage
Read 15 tweets
Feb 25
No one gets famous by accident. If Alexey @Navalny rose as the unalternative leader of Russian opposition, recognised as such both in Moscow and in DC, this indicates he had something that others lacked. Today we will discuss what it was and why it did not suffice 🧵Image
Let's start with the public image. What was so special about the (mature) @navalny is that his public image represented normality. And by normality I mean first and foremost the American, Hollywood normality

Look at this photo. He represents himself as American politicians doImage
For an American politician, it is very important to present himself as a good family man (or woman). Exceptions do only corroborate the rule. Notice how McCain defends @BarackObama

"No, he's a decent family man, citizen"

In America one thing is tied with another
Read 23 tweets
Feb 19
Should Putin just suddenly die, @MedvedevRussiaE is the most likely compromise candidate for the supreme political power. He is the inaugurated President for God's sake. Which means, the anointed King.Image
"Not a real king", "Figurehead", "Nobody takes him seriously" is just intangible verbalism. Nothing of that matters. What matters is that he is the inaugurated President, consecrated by God. Opinions are subjective, anointment is objective

It is the factImage
Medvedev may be one single person in the entire Russian establishment with a decent chance to keep power, should Putin go. For this reason, he may not even need to fight for power. The power will very probably be handed to him

He is the rightful King -> guarantor of stabilityImage
Read 8 tweets
Feb 18
On Friday, @navalny died (most probably killed) in prison. This is a good time to discuss the prospects of Russian opposition and the future transition of political power, once Putin is gone. This is also a good occasion to debunk some pervasive myths on the mechanics of power🧵 Image
First, getting rid of @navalny was probably a correct decision on behalf of Kremlin. Execution of this murder may have been suboptimal (unprofessional, etc.). But the very idea to eliminate him was reasonable and makes total sense. There is nothing crazy or irrational about it
This remark may sound as cynical or paradoxical. So let me present you another paradox, which is yet to be fully processed by the political theorists. And the paradox is:

Bloody tyrants rule longer

The Russian history may possibly demonstrate this better than any otherImage
Image
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(