Marco Rogers Profile picture
Jan 28 20 tweets 6 min read
I think the thing that bothers me about the free speech debate is how simplistic it is. The idea that we aren't allowed to examine anything about the context in which things exist.
The ACLU is a body that tries to protect speech through legal action. There is a reason the ACLU isn't trying to help people get their Twitter accounts back. Because it's not the same fucking thing.
The ACLU also tries to actually stop bigoted discrimination. Because they know that's also bad. But then you talk to people like @siberianmi and he's like "the ACLU did a thing one time which means we can't censor anything ever even if it means people are getting hurt".
Then he does the thing that all white people do. "Let me tell you how the civil rights movement went. And how we won!"

I mean the sheer audacity it takes to say "they tried to censor MLK and that was bad. So maybe we should let the Nazis use substack."
And we know Kevin isn't actually engaged with the *impact* of these things. Because he's not actually under threat. This isn't about debating "ideas". This is about what happens when the ideas spread and start radicalizing people.
Hmm. Kevin's deleting his tweets. I guess he doesn't want to debate ideas anymore. Weird how do many people who swear debating things openly is the only way to work things out aren't actually ready to do that.
Fine line between debating and "dunking" I guess. One of them is necessary for the progress of human society and the other should be... censored?
Kevin I'm not sure why you thought that debating life or death issues was gonna be nice and cordial. The context was there for people to find. Until you started deleting it.
Kevin if everybody who was afraid of repercussions chose to silence their voice, we would never have seen the progress that was made by the civil rights movement. MLK wouldn't have deleted his tweets.
I don't think Kevin's coming back y'all. I'm sorry you didn't get to be influenced by this rigorous debate of ideas. Apparently self-censoring is the one exception to the rule about no censoring. I'm gonna call the ACLU and ask whether this new info changes their outlook at all.
What he's saying is that not only can we not do anything to stop toxic ideas, but we also are not allowed to have any reactions to the ideas. We need debate to stay very calm, passive, emotionless. That's how you stop Nazis.
Kevin thought it was important that you all don't lose the context of this debate. I asked him for an example of when we "won" against toxic ideas using reasoned debate. His first example was slavery abolition!!
This is what I said after hearing Kevin's interpretation of how things happened with slavery abolition and with the civil rights movement. It's so incredibly dangerous to see what happens when people believe lies about history.
Listen. I don't know everything about everything. Maybe my thinking is too simplistic as well. I'm interested in stopping harm. So I think we should *do* things to try and stop harm. I keep arguing with people who say the way to stop harm is to *not* do things. What am I missing?
Do nothing. Don't stop anybody from doing anything. And somehow the world will magically right itself. Vanquishing bigots and other bad actors. Cleansing itself of toxicity. But also without inconveniencing any of those bad actors. Is that what I'm supposed to be waiting on?
My wife can tell you that there's a singular pursuit that has been burning a hole in my brain for years now. If we say we're trying to make a change happen, what is the mechanism by which it is supposed to happen. Tell me *how*.
When you try to dig in with people on this, you eventually hit a wall. They don't know how this shit works. They're telling a fairy tale. It always ends with "and they lived happily ever after". You never find out how things are supposed to actually change.
This is what I've started to refer to as magical thinking. It's not a very charitable phrase. It makes people mad and defensive. And that's understandable. But it's intentionally provocative. I need people to acknowledge that they didn't actually paint a full picture.
What I've found is that when you probe at the cracks in their fairy tales, eventually you activate an incredible amount of dissonance in people. Once a worldview has been established, people need it to stay true. Tearing it down is painful.
We're not debating reality. We're debating our beliefs about reality. I've come to accept that's how humans work. I'm trying to figure out what to do with that truth. How does that change how I engage with people? So far it has only made me more obnoxious. I'm still processing.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Marco Rogers

Marco Rogers Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @polotek

Jan 29
I’m disappointed but I’m not judging this person. We all need to understand that the majority of jobs still work this way. And the majority of people are still conditioned to think this way. We are still teaching each other that we can all do better and we can all have better.
I seem to be the only one who has sympathy for this person. Y’all love to tell me I’m the mean one. Y’all say you’re mad at employers, but you’re actually not. You will destroy a Worker way faster than you’ll actually come for Owners. It’s wild.
I can’t start the fight I wanna start today. But let me say this. Having sympathy for someone doesn’t mean they didn’t do anything wrong. Being thoughtful about how you wanna approach telling someone they did something wrong. That’s on you. It has nothing to do with them.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 28
They're not on Twitter because you're not posting them on Twitter. They should be on Twitter. We should know about them from people who are actually trying to protect others from harm. But that's my point. It's not fucking happening.
"It's completely transparent and public".

Then where the fuck is it? Why can't I see it? Why would a thing that is supposed to be so valuable be so good at hiding?
I'm sitting on one of the biggest info distribution machines ever created. And you're telling me it's not on here. It's sucking up billions of dollars from people and it's not on here. And you think that's good? You think that soothes concerns and fills people with trust?
Read 5 tweets
Jan 27
"Some of us are not the bad ones. And unless you can say specifically which ones are, you should shut up."

Why does literally everybody inside some harmful shit think this argument holds weight?
The whole point is that we don't know where the bad stuff is. If you're inside of it WHY DON'T YOU FUCKING TELL US?!

"I mean yeah some shit's going down but I'm pretty sure it's not my part". - literally every person who has ever been part of a harm machine
"Every 10th time you stick your hand in this bag, you're gonna lose a finger. But unless you stick your hand in here, you can't really criticize."

Bro, what the fuck are you talking about?!
Read 10 tweets
Jan 27
Okay. Here's the thing that bothers me about the calendly issue. I don't feel strongly about it either way. But it feels so clear to me that the discourse around it is mostly driven by the fact that the guy who delivered the message sounds like a tool.
Like it feels very reactionary. This guy becomes the representative for everybody who maybe isn't so thrilled about the rise of calendly culture. And people are like "fuck this guy. If it means pissing this guy off then inject calendly directly into my veins!"
Then some people are like "I mean I wouldn't say it like that guy did, but I sort of don't like calendly either".

"What?! You must be exactly the same kind of tool that this guy is."

It has been disheartening to watch tbh.
Read 6 tweets
Jan 26
Here's what's fascinating about being here in the moment and watching crypto develop. We have greater transparency into how these online systems are being built. If we're paying attention, we can learn a lot about the actual mechanisms of how systemic harm happens.
Remember we talked about idealists and sociopaths working together?
Read 7 tweets
Jan 26
No offense, but I'm probably on the other end of the spectrum on this. What I have learned about online discourse is that people show you who they are pretty early on. But the faux politeness people can waste a lot of your time.
But more so, I roundly reject the idea that we should be *more* concerned with being polite than with the harm being done. I believe that is one of the *primary* ways that we have created a society where harm cannot be effectively addressed.
We constrain ourselves from the outset. So the people doing the harm are afforded the benefit of the doubt. They learn to take advantage of these constraints we place on ourselves. While they are not bound by any such handicap.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(