Simon Edge Profile picture
Jan 29 24 tweets 5 min read
For those of us who were in London in July 2005, the events of that month are unforgettable. But that was 17 years ago, and younger people may be completely unaware of them. In light of this week's political events, that awful time is worth revisiting.
It started on a high, on 6 July, when London was awarded the right to stage the 2012 Olympics. It was a surprise victory – Paris had been the clear favourite – and caused massive excitement. Hundreds celebrated in Trafalgar Square that night. But the joy didn't last.
The next morning, terrorists set off rush-hour bombs on three tube trains and a bus. 52 people died, all UK residents, of 18 nationalities. More than 700 were injured. It was the UK's worst terrorist attack since Lockerbie in 1988 and the country's first Islamist suicide attack.
Exactly two weeks later, bombers struck the tube and bus network again, in another four places. This time the bombs were badly made and there was only one minor injury, but it was terrifying – and the whole transport network was shut down.
Since the bombs hadn't gone off properly, the would-be suicide bombers didn't die. Manhunts were launched, based on fairly clear CCTV imagery.
At 9.30 the next morning, this man came out of his flat in Tulse Hill, south London. He was a 27-year-old Brazilian called Jean Charles de Menezes, on his way to fix a broken fire alarm in Kilburn, on the other side of London. As you can see, he looks nothing like the bombers.
Nevertheless, an officer on duty decided he did, and radioed his commander, who told him to follow the man and to make sure he didn't get on the tube. Several plain clothes officers now followed Jean Charles on the bus to Brixton, the nearest tube station to his home.
Brixton tube turned out to be closed – the transport network was still in chaos – so Jean Charles walked to the next station, Stockwell. He picked up a free paper at the entrance, used his Oyster card to get through the barriers, and reached the platform just as a train arrived.
Officers then followed him onto the train and shot him seven times in the head, in full view of all the other petrified passengers.
Yes you read that right. Seven times. In the head.
The Met immediately said he was a terror suspect, but it quickly became clear he was nothing of the kind. He wasn't carrying a bomb, or anything suspicious, and he looked nothing like the actual bombers.
They then claimed he had been acting suspiciously: he vaulted the barrier, he wore a bulky coat in hot weather (potentially covering a suicide vest), and he failed to respond when challenged.

None of those things were true. All flat-out lies.
In truth, the operation was a shitshow from start to finish: sloppy surveillance by the police, appalling communications along the way and then lie upon lie from the Met as the institution scrambled to cover its arse and defame the innocent man its officers had assassinated.
Revulsion over the incident led demonstrations in the UK and shock waves abroad. Prime Minister Tony Blair issued a formal apology to the government of Brazil.
No individual officer was ever charged with the shooting, but the Met commissioner, Sir Ian Blair, was prosecuted under health and safety laws. Even then, the Met continued to play dirty.
They mounted a character assassination of the man they'd killed, falsely suggesting he was high on drugs at the time and had behaved in an aggressive and threatening way. More lies.
In addition, they issued a picture attempting to show that the dead man did look a bit like one of the suspects. It turned out that picture had been wildly distorted, in a further attempt to deceive.
The bad smell eventually cost Ian Blair his job, although of course it didn't prevent his elevation to the House of Lords – Lord Blair of Boughton is now a legislator for life – nor stop him walking away with a massive payoff.
And what of the person at the end of the radio, who gave all the orders all the way along? They too were quietly put out to pasture, right?
Wrong. Gold Commander Cressida Dick – for it was she – was promoted, first to Deputy Assistant Commissioner, then to Assistant Commissioner. Then she went to a director-general role at the Foreign Office before returning to the Met as Commissioner, Britain's top police officer.
She was also awarded the Queen's Police Medal for Distinguished Service, was made a Commander of the British Empire, and then ultimately given the DBE – so she is now Dame Cressida Dick. Only in the UK can you fail upwards in quite such spectacular style.
This is the woman who said the Met didn't investigate crimes committed in the past, that there was no evidence of law-breaking in 10 Downing Street and, when confronted with unmissable suitcase-loads of that evidence, is now manoeuvring to make sure that evidence never emerges.
She is the symbol of all that's rotten in our country. To anyone who remembers the events of July 2005, it's sickening but no great surprise.
If we can't consign this serially incompetent abuser of office to the dustbin of history, we can at least do something else: never forget Jean Charles de Menezes.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Simon Edge

Simon Edge Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @simonjedge

Dec 27, 2021
I've read some exaggerations re law on homosexuality in the Gulf state of Qatar so I thought I'd check for myself. I consulted an expert authority, which classifies Qatar as a Zone 3 country (out of 3), where sexual acts between people of the same sex are illegal. More details 👇
Sexual acts between people of the same sex are illegal
according to the Articles 296 (3) and 285 of Qatar's Penal Code. Punishments include imprisonment for between one and five years.
Qatar also runs Sharia courts, where technically it is possible that Muslim men could face the death penalty for same-sex sexual activity, although there is no record of this actually happening. That means Qatar isn't Saudi Arabia or Iran. But it's not exactly gay-friendly.
Read 13 tweets
Nov 19, 2021
Nancy Kelley's interview on Woman's Hour did indeed seem like 'a Wizard of Oz moment'. But it raises an interesting question. If the CEO of Stonewall isn't the malign genius behind this breathtakingly efficient capture of the public and private realm by gender ideology, who is?
In my fictional take, to which @M4rtyman alludes here, there's a nutjob US billionaire providing unlimited cash for the flat-earth takeover, with a sinister lobbyist in a Bond villain lair at the top of a Bermondsey council block directing strategy.

That's strictly fiction. To tell stories, you need a small number of players in easily defined roles, and you also need a way of resolving the story neatly. If only real life were so simple.
Read 19 tweets
Nov 7, 2021
This week I contributed to a documentary about a gay murder in the early 90s. To prepare, I looked through the Capital Gay archive of 1993. It made grim reading. This thread may be useful next time we're told that using the 'wrong' pronoun is the same as homophobia in the 90s.
JANUARY. Obituaries took up a lot of space in gay newspapers – both in editorial and the small ads. One of these is a world celebrity; everyone else is a gay Londoner. Aside from Nureyev, the ages of the deceased (where provided) are 45, 34 and 33.
FEBRUARY. Police thwart a queer*bashing spree on Hampstead Heath, arresting four men armed with baseball bats, CS gas canisters and snooker cues.

*The violent attackers were looking to attack, maim and even murder gay men, not married heterosexual oppression tourists.
Read 17 tweets
Oct 24, 2021
So SNP researcher Jonathan Kiehlmann – who aptly calls himself @kiehlmanniac on here – has been suspended of his Commons pass after retweeting an extremist advocating armed violence against women who defend their rights under the Equality Act.
As the Mail on Sunday article makes clear, Kiehlmann's behaviour was particularly sickening because he retweeted this repellent tweet just one day after the murder of MP David Amess.
This comes in the week when @KirstySNP, the ex deputy leader of the SNP at Westminster, branded an LGB gathering across the road from Parliament a 'hate conference' – knowing that her colleague @joannaccherry & several other MPs & peers (including gay MP @JNHanvey) would attend.
Read 6 tweets
Oct 21, 2021
It was a great honour to appear on a panel at #LGBAlliance2021 today, alongside @jo_bartosch, @DreyfusJames and @JNHanvey. The QE2 Centre was a far cry from those modest beginnings in Conway Hall two years ago. What a stunning achievement by @BevJacksonAuth and Kate Harris.
As ever, it was great to meet familiar people IRL for the first time. With some, you feel you know them so well on here, you forget you’ve never met IRL before. Twitter may be a hellsite, but this networking - and these genuine friendships - couldn’t have happened without it.
And what an extraordinary boost to get a gushing message of support from the prime minister. He was never my choice of prime minister, to put it mildly, but his support puts Keir Starmer, Ed Davey and Nicola Sturgeon to shame.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 10, 2021
Debate rages on both sides of the Atlantic about the editorial values of the Guardian. It's that kind of publication nowadays, setting the agenda internationally. What a departure this is from most of its history, when it was the poor relation of British broadsheets.
I started reading the 'Grauniad' in the 80s, when it was still famous for its misprints. Guardian readers were a tribe, although we didn't use that word then. Like all the media, the Guardian was vile on lesbian and gay issues, but otherwise it was my spiritual home.
In the mid-80s the Independent came along, but as a reader I never defected. Back then, the Indy was much more suity and centrist – it took its name seriously – whereas the Guardian was unashamedly of the left.
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(