Here’s vax uptake and waning among the elderly in the US and several European countries.
Note how that red "unvaxxed elderly" segment extends much further right for the US, with millions still vulnerable well into its summer Delta wave.
Far more severely waned second doses, too
And this is after the US got off to a big head-start, getting second doses into elderly arms well ahead of Europe.
(👀 second row of charts here)
But where the black line rose first, it stopped rising at a much lower level than leading European countries.
So what we’ve done in this story is combine all the data we have on age-specific exposure:
• Baseline pre-vaccine risk of severe disease by age
• Share of age group with x doses, and how much waning
• Vaccine efficacy against Delta and Omicron
• For every day of the last year
The result: population-weighted scores for exposure to hospitalisation over time
• Eng & US started rollouts earlier
• But soon overtaken by EU countries (US because rollout slowed, England because AZ)
• Boosters pushed exposure yet lower
• Omi’s immune evasion caused a bump
And that’s where we get these charts showing how one country’s hospitalisation toll might have looked if it had another country’s vax coverage.
We start with the observed data, here for the US, and then multiply it by the ratio between US and Danish exposure scores every day
We can also flip the comparison around and see, for example, how English Covid hospitalisations would have looked if we had US vaccination coverage.
The answer: much worse, coming quite close to last winter’s peak.
Another interesting counterfactual, as also calculated by @PaulMainwood last week for the Omicron period, is what would things look like without boosters?
In England, hospital occupancy would have (un)comfortably exceeded last winter’s peak.
And here’s England with Polish rates of vaccination 😬
There’s an extensive methodology box on our story, and full reproducible code on GitHub github.com/Financial-Time…
So, why does all of this matter?
Because of this chart.
Covid’s IFR in England has fallen steeply since last winter, but that wasn’t by chance, it was [largely] because of vaccines.
In countries with poor vax coverage, Covid will still be far more than twice as lethal as flu.
For example, here are CFRs for England, Portugal and the US (IFRs are only possible for England, thanks to the @ONS infection survey 🙏)
Just like in hospital exposure chart, poor US vax coverage means its CFR has stayed much higher until Omicron, and remains higher with Omicron
And while Omicron’s intrinsic mildness is good news for us all, invaluable data from France (via @nicolasberrod) shows that vaccines still do more to reduce Covid’s lethality than Omicron does.
This matches what we’re hearing more hospital doctors all over the world: even with Omicron, unvaccinated people remain at substantial risk of severe disease and worse
So as long as large numbers of elderly people remain unvaxxed or have waned protection, Covid will continue to be a major burden.
If we want Covid to be over, and to be able to get on with our lives, we need to get everyone vaccinated.
And as many have said, we must also remember Covid is much more transmissible than flu, so even though its lethality per-infection has fallen, the number of infections in any given year is still far, far higher.
It’s also worth noting that Omicron’s intrinsic mildness was a lucky strike for us. If the next variant is an offshoot of Delta, that gift would be revoked, and everything will rest on vaccines (and infection-acquired immunity) again.
Finally, a very interesting randomised controlled trial into vaccines’ impact on sporting performance concluded over the weekend, with striking results...
Researchers took elite athletes, matched on age and Grand Slam titles, and assigned them to one of two conditions:
Novax ⛔️
Needal 💉
Being unvaxxed was associated with:
• Extended periods of inactivity
• Loss of shared Grand Slam record
• Deportation
NEW: Is the internet changing our personalities for the worse?
Conscientiousness and extroversion are down, neuroticism up, with young adults leading the charge.
This is a really consequential shift, and there’s a lot going on here, so let’s get into the weeds 🧵
First up, personality analysis can feel vague, and you might well ask why it even matters?
On the first of those, the finding of distinct personality traits is robust. This field of research has been around for decades and holds up pretty well, even across cultures.
On the second, studies consistently find personality shapes life outcomes.
In fact, personality traits — esp conscientiousness and neuroticism — are stronger predictors of career success, divorce and mortality than someone’s socio-economic background or cognitive abilities.
There’s been a lot of discussion lately about rising graduate unemployment.
I dug a little closer and a striking story emerged:
Unemployment is climbing among young graduate *men*, but college-educated young women are generally doing okay.
In fact, young men with a college degree now have the same unemployment rate as young men who didn’t go to college, completely erasing the graduate employment premium.
Whereas a healthy premium remains for young women.
What’s going on?
At first glance, this looks like a case of the growing masses of male computer science graduates being uniquely exposed to the rapid adoption of generative AI in the tech sector, and finding jobs harder to come by than earlier cohorts.
The number of people travelling from Europe to the US in recent weeks has plummeted by as much as 35%, as travellers have cancelled plans in response to Trump’s policies and rhetoric, and horror stories from the border.
Denmark saw one of the steepest declines, in an indication that anger over Trump’s hostility towards Greenland may be contributing to the steep drop-off in visitor numbers.
Corporate quotes are usually pretty dry, but the co-founder of major travel website Kayak wasn’t mincing his words:
Recent results from major international tests show that the average person’s capacity to process information, use reasoning and solve novel problems has been falling since around the mid 2010s.
What should we make of this?
Nobody would argue that the fundamental biology of the human brain has changed in that time span. People’s underlying intellectual capacity is surely undimmed.
But there is growing evidence that the extent to which people can practically apply that capacity has been diminishing.
For such an important topic, there’s remarkably little long-term data on attention spans, focus etc.
But one source that has consistently tracked this is the Monitoring The Future survey, which finds a steep rise in the % of people struggling to concentrate or learn new things.