All detail stripped from Sue Gray's report, but it is still clear in its condemnation:
- Behaviour is "difficult to justify"
- "failures of leadership"
- "Some of the events should not have been allowed"
- "The excessive consumption of alcohol is not appropriate"
- Behaviour is "difficult to justify"
- "failures of leadership"
- "Some of the events should not have been allowed"
- "The excessive consumption of alcohol is not appropriate"
"There was too little thought given to what was happening across the country in considering the appropriateness of some of these gatherings, the risks they presented to public health and how they might appear to the public. There were failures of leadership and judgment."
The full list of events Sue Gray investigated... 
All of those events have reached the threshold for criminal investigation by police, save for these dates:
• 15 May 2020
• 27 November 2020
• 10 December 2020
• 15 December 2020
• 15 May 2020
• 27 November 2020
• 10 December 2020
• 15 December 2020
Yes, Gray's report lacks detail. But it is damning in its overall conclusion that many of these events should not have taken place and amounted to a failure of leadership.
The fact almost all are being investigated police is doubly damning.
The fact almost all are being investigated police is doubly damning.
Sue Gray concludes that there must be change.
"There is significant learning to be drawn from these events which must be addressed immediately across Government. This does not need to wait for the police
investigations to be concluded."
"There is significant learning to be drawn from these events which must be addressed immediately across Government. This does not need to wait for the police
investigations to be concluded."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
