Whether or not you accept Maoism as a "valid 3rd synthesis" of Marxism in the same way that Leninism is regarded as a 2nd synthesis, the actual principles of Leninism are largely exclusive to Maoist parties within the sphere of 21st century class struggle.
The neo-Leninist parties that exist outside of existing state power are largely legalistic and parliamentary. These parties have done to Lenin exactly what he feared most in death: he has been converted into a harmless icon, robbing his revolutionary theory of its substance.
Who in the international struggle properly recognizes the Communist Party as an illegal entity? Who wages revolution? Who builds dual power? The great irony is that those who reject Maoism as merely Leninism with a new name will rarely find that Leninism anywhere else.
It goes without saying that what I am describing here is a trend, not a law. Any ML party which upholds Lenin in earnest, in the ways described above, will probably have my support even if they reject Maoist theories.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here's a thread on Lysenko that nobody asked for 🧵
Lysenko is a meme, but he was also basically a living fable of why it's important to reject the idealism of an appeal to authority. The reason he climbed his way up in the USSR was because some of his work was actually really good. Notably, he discovered/invented vernalization.
Vernalization is essentially a technique where you freeze or chill germinating seedlings and it causes them flower faster. He did it with a bunch of grain after a really bad winter in the USSR to make it behave like spring wheat and made him into a soviet star.
The obvious lesson to be learned from the r/antiwork collapse is the same one to be learned from every other spontaneous semi-organized movement in the last few years: the bourgeoisie will exploit the absence of a principled central organ and well-organized central committee.
The fleet of professional anti-communists that make up the state and media demand a fleet of professional communists. Vanguardism is not a power grab from the proletariat, it is the necessary construction of a fist with which to smash the state.
r/antiwork's "anti-authoritarian" rejection of concentrated and professional revolutionary ideology is precisely what caused it to fold under its first confrontation with authority.