Just to pause there: there is a reasonably possibility a criminal investigation is taking place into an event which took place in the Prime Minister's flat.
The 2nd point (b) which sets my lawyer's senses tingling is that Gray is keeping her investigation's documents securely *away from the government". This is a constitutional mess and a half and shows problem of using an internal report to do job of an independent investigation
Actually, I have reread this para and it is not as ambiguous as I thought it was "the events on the date set out above*. Obvious enough that the gathering in the Prime Minister's flat is being investigated by the police. 
Questions to ask the PM:
1. Do you accept the findings
2. If you accept the findings, which events should not have taken place
3. Are you under direct police investigation
4. Will you make public any fixed penalty notices you are given
1. Do you accept the findings
2. If you accept the findings, which events should not have taken place
3. Are you under direct police investigation
4. Will you make public any fixed penalty notices you are given
The Prime Minister just confirmed to Parliament that the event in his flat on 13 November 2020 is being investigated by the police.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
