Potamopotos Profile picture
Jan 31 18 tweets 5 min read
A THREAD ON WHETHER LAYPEOPLE CAN ABSOLVE SINS

Our Lutheran Confessions retain holy absolution for good reason, it is a means of grace and useful for comforting believers. Augsburg Conf XI “It is taught among us that private absolution should be retained and not allowed to fall
into disuse.”
And this holy absolution is nothing else than the usage of the power of the keys to bind and to absolve sins, “It is well known that we have so explained and extolled the blessing of absolution and the power of the keys that many troubled consciences have received
consolation from our teaching.” Apologia art XI.
Holy Absolution then is a sacrament of the church, ibid., which strengthens and builds up faith by the proclamation of the promises of God.
But not only does the Augsburg Confession restrict the administration of the sacraments
to the ministry, but the very nature of Holy Absolution is the very wielding of the power of the keys, which properly belongs to the church collectively, but is administrated and exercised by the pastor specifically. This is why no individual lay man can excommunicate another
believer. But this power of the keys does not come in a broken fashion, as if one could have it in a half-way manner, able to absolve yet unable to bind. The single power of the keys is to bind and loose, no less no more. One cannot have the one without the other.
Holy Absolution is the very voice of God promising the absolution of all one's sins, spoken through the pastor in God's stead, more or less verbatim CA 25
This can be done, as per Gerhard, because God has chosen to use the ministry as His ambassadors and heralds, with the mandate
to speak on his behalf. Melanchthon also cooperates that by saying "since the Gospel is like a certain kind of domestic ministry, and since this ministry does not curb with bodily force, but only with words, we use the name "keys" to signify the ecclesiastical ministry. So then,
ecclesiastical power and the keys signify the same thing." (...) But jurisdiction is the power to excommunicate those who are guilty of the public offenses and again to absolve them, if they are converted and seek absolution. Therefore, according to the Gospel, ecclesiastical
power properly includes, first, the command to teach the Gospel, to announce the forgiveness of sins, and to distribute the Sacraments to individuals or to many; and second, it also includes jurisdiction, but without bodily force, as we have said" (...) Obedience is also owed to
them in the area of jurisdiction, which they have according to the Gospel, namely, in the investigation of offenses, in hearing witnesses, in legitimate excommunication, etc."
Loci 1535, on "Ecclesiastical Power: The Keys"
The pastor, then, has the jurisdiction of the keys, to
bind and to loose, which is one and the same authority, to absolve and to excommunicate. This jurisdiction is held by no individual lay man and thus cannot be exercised.
When a believer hears the words of holy absolution he can trust them immediately as the very words of God
spoken to him visibly by God's ambassador, to use Gerhard's terminology.
When a lay man shares God's gracious promises and thus he consoles his brother. And though both are efficacious when grasped by faith there is a difference in the immediacy and in the nature of the act, the
former being stronger insofar as it is sacrament and means of grace. As per Gerhard and Melanchthon, the laity is simply unable to confer absolution as absolution presupposes the authority of the ministry by which the minister, in a certain manner, can act on God's behalf. When
the minister proclaims "I forgive you of all your sins" he is acting in God's stead and truly brings about what is said.

Compare this to baptism, which all Christians have the authority to confer. When the baptizer proclaims "I baptize you in the name ..." then he is acting in
the stead of God and is truly a secondary cause of the event taking place.

I think that is a good analogy to holy absolution, which might shed a bit of light on why the laity cannot do that. Because, in the words of Melanchthon, “There is a twofold authority of pastors. The one
is called the ministry by which they impart to us the gospel and the sacraments and announce the forgiveness of sins publicly and privately. (…) The other authority is called jurisdiction. This is certain external judgment of the church which pertains only to manifest crimes.
It is the power to excommunicate and absolve. " no single lay individual has this authority or this jurisdiction, but the pastor does. That is why laity cannot bind and excommunicate as well as absolve.

Let us therefore with ever greater joy seek the great comfort and joy of
Holy Absolution as words spoken by God by His own ministers

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Potamopotos

Potamopotos Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @potamopotos

Dec 20, 2021
A THREAD ON SAINT AUGUSTINE AND JUSTIFICATION

An evangelical understanding?

Augustine taught that man's justification, iustificari, consisted of man's inner renewal, that we are made more and more just ontologically. Yet he was also keenly aware that this righteousness would
never suffice. He wrote “To sum up generally and briefly the view which, so far as relates to holy living, I entertain concerning virtue,—virtue is the love with which that which ought to be loved is loved. This is in some greater, in others less, and there are men in whom it
does not exist at all; but in the absolute fulness which admits of no increase, it exists in no man while living on this earth; so long, however, as it admits of being increased there can be no doubt that, in so far as it is less than it ought to be,
Read 27 tweets
Dec 19, 2021
This one hits me hard 🥲

WHENEVER I meditate upon the suffering of my Lord, I cannot but venture a great deal in respect to the love of God and His forbearance toward my sins. He bends His head to kiss me; He extends His arms to embrace me; Image
He opens His hands to bestow gifts upon me; He opens His side that I may behold His heart glowing with love for me; He is lifted up from the earth that He may draw all men unto Himself (John 12:32); His wounds are livid with grief, yet gleaming with love Image
and in those open wounds we must seek for the secret of His heart. Truly with Him is plenteous redemption; for not a drop only, but streams of blood flowed from five parts of His body (...) Can Christ possibly forget in His life, those for whom He was willing to suffer death? Image
Read 4 tweets
Oct 13, 2021
The alter and apsis at the Lutheran Church where I guided a tour today
Read 7 tweets
Aug 27, 2021
A thread on the monstrous division of justification into a so called initial and continuous justification

Is Justification to Be Attributed to Faith Only at the Beginning of Conversion in Such a Way, that After the First Conversion We are Justified No Longer by Faith Alone
The manner of justification is one and the same in the beginning, middle, and end, namely that we are justified by faith alone, by the pure grace of God, solely for the sake of Christ. For Paul, Ro 4, citing a universal example of justification, does not cite Abraham when he was
first converted, Gn 12, but Gn 15, when he had already rendered to God obedience in faith in various exercises for a number of years after his first call, Heb 11:8 ff. Midstream in good works, as it were, Paul puts the question: What is Abraham’s justification or in what does
Read 8 tweets
Aug 17, 2021
I've written some Danish pieces on the presence of Sola Scriptura in Saint Augustine, and though many works and quotes come to mind, I especially want to share these with you,
1)
"In order to leave room for such profitable discussions of difficult questions, there is a distinct Image
boundary line separating all productions subsequent to apostolic times from the authoritative canonical books of the Old and New Testaments. The authority of these books has come down to us from the apostles through the successions of bishops and the extension of the Church, and
from a position of lofty supremacy, claims the submission of every faithful and pious mind. If we are perplexed by an apparent contradiction in Scripture, it is not allowable to say, The author of this book is mistaken
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(