"It is improper to pass an order to hand over any unwilling married woman to her husband with whom she does not want to stay. The court also said that nobody should consider an adult woman as a consumer product"
Woman was already married, and was in a live-in relationship with another man. Eventhough protection to such couple was denied, the court categorically stated,
Upheld the right of a woman to be the sole nominee for the service benefits of her husband. The wife had left behind her husband and three children (22-years ago) when she eloped with a 19-year-old man
Issue whether the respondent is living in adultery or not can be decided only after evidence. At the time of fixing interim maintenance this Court is not inclined to go into this question at this juncture.
READ ORDER | Wife Paying Maintenance To Able Bodied Husband Would Promote “Idleness”: Kerala HC
▪️"If maintenance is granted, then idleness of husbands will be promoted & they will be tempted not to do any work & depend on the wife for their livelihood"