I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, no matter how big you think this story is you need to double it…Now, triple that. Let’s take a look at where this recent part is all heading (TLDR: Congress) and remember who is doing it. A wee coup thread. 🧵 👇🏻
It’s pretty fair to say that the amount of evidence that has been uncovered to date, tells us that the trump/Republican coup attempt to end democracy was a vast, wide-ranging conspiracy.
All we have to do is look at arrests, who the @January6thCmte wants to talk to, and who was around trump. We know that Oathkeepers are indicted for Seditious Conspiracy. That’s a big charge, and rarely used because coups are rare.
We’ve seen Proudboys indicted for Conspiracy too. Not Seditous Conspiracy like the Oathkeepers, just Conspiracy…for now. Think back to Jan 6, the violent images you remember came largely from these two groups. They moved with military precision.
So they planned. We’ve seen the draft letter Jeffrey Clark sent to GA (link) that argued state legislatures can appoint their own electors. Similar argument is made in the Eastman memo which also argues the Electoral Count Act is unconstitutional. justsecurity.org/wp-content/upl…
So *they* planned. We’ve seen a draft executive order purported to have been written by psychological warfare experts, Col Phil Waldron and Gen Mike Flynn that further promote the lie of a stolen election and would allow for the seizure of voting machines. politico.com/f/?id=0000017e…
We’ve seen Mike Flynn, Sidney Powell, Patrick Byrne and others in a meeting with trump on December 18th 2020 wherein they called for seizing voting machines. My favorite part is when trump leaves the room to get pigs in a blanket*.
So *they* planned. We’ve seen Rudy Giuliani, and Powell lose lawsuits because no fraud occurred, the plaintiffs had no standing, and mostly because there was no evidence to show the courts. Some of the plaintiff’s, even went on to become the very electors called for by Eastman.
Stop here for a moment, and just assess the above. It’s pretty big. It’s militias, lawyers, and intelligence operators all working toward the single goal of keeping trump, but more importantly, the Republicans in power. Think of what they were actually doing.
They tried to lay the foundation, using the DOJ, that sending fraudulent electors was perfectly fine. They were trying to perpetrate FRAUD. They were trying to strongarm Pence into telling the House of Representatives to nullify *our* election, and do theirs.
So *they* planned. Paul Gosar objected to the certification of Arizona. He chose to disenfranchise every single voter in his very own state. A state in which he himself was voted for. Ted Cruz was the Senator who rose with Gosar to also object.
I can still see Cruz standing there, bathing in the golf claps of the Republicans who were in the room, hanging his head so as to look humble, but desperately wanting it to continue. The look of disappointment as the clapping soon dissipates without a gaveled intervention.
So in order for this coup to have worked, Cruz had to know, Gosar had to know, Pence had to know, as you read in the Eastman memo, the Senate Pro Tempore was to fill in should Pence ‘recuse himself’ for some reason. Which means Chuck Grassley had to know.
During the insurrection, Rudy butt-dialed Sen Mike Lee looking for Sen Tommy Tuberville to tell him to try to keep stalling. So Tuberville had to know. The fact Rudy got Lee on the horn means he had at least had a recent contact with him as well, so perhaps Lee too knew.
On the other side of the Capitol, House minority leader Kevin McCarthy and Steve Scalise tried to prevent Speaker Nancy Pelosi from joining a lawsuit that was prepared for Justice Alito. Louie Gohmert sued Pence arguing Electoral Count Act unconstitutional. Why did they do that?
If that’s familiar to you, it’s because it was in the Clark letter. Gohmert was represented by a lawyer who was contracted to work for a Sidney Powell/Mike Flynn/Joe Flynn company (DTR). Gohmert was joined by all 11 fraudulent Arizona Electors. Rep Gohmert probably knew.
So *they* planned. Folks, we have a long way still to go. It is frustrating to see so blatant an attack on our country laid out before us, and not seeing everyone along the way held accountable. We may wonder ‘where is DOJ?’, or ‘what can we do?’
We need to understand everything described above. Our elected officials were in on this coup. If they knew and said nothing, they have failed their public trust. If they planned this or helped to orchestrate it in any way, is that not waging war against us?
We’ve yet to see any elected official held to account for their role in this coup and already in this thread, we’ve seen how big this story is. We’ve yet to see all depths. No matter how big you think it is, double it…now, triple that.
We can’t waste any time waiting, and hoping for a savior. We have to determine who we want to be. We have to decide if we are who we tell ourselves we are. Make sure you are registered to vote and vote.
Why do you think it is so important to those still beholden to all of the above to make it more difficult for you to vote? Why do you think they want to suppress your voice? Why do you think they want to stop you from voting at all cost?
It’s because they know the power of your vote. Right now the voting rights of millions are in peril because of only 2 votes. 2 votes can stop millions. That’s how powerful a vote is. Yours is more powerful than even that. Confirm you’re registered to vote and #RememberInNovember
We must see where this investigation is heading now that we know what they were up to. Oh, and we haven’t even gotten to who paid for it yet.
Adding this development. @January6thCmte provided, to a court of law, they have a good faith basis to believe trump committed crimes. It they also provide documentation that includes the names Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley.
We are in the Both Sides Era. For what seems the past decade, we have been subjected to both sides of the news, normalizing the weird, accepting the inappropriate, and moving on from the unforgivable.
Both sides are not the same.
A wee Sunday morning coffee🧵👇🏻
We have been so conditioned to Both Sides everything that we immediately fall into one side or the other. We are sorting ourselves based on memes and shallow thinking. Reporters complaining about hotel experiences due to the DNC running late, isn’t news. That’s a yelp review.
Have you noticed trump is on both sides of every issue? Probably not, because the “press hasn’t yet learned how to report on trump.” Why is covering trump any different from what they learned in journalism school?
Why not ask him about his incongruities? Or a follow up question?
Did you ever hear the phrase: “they have so much money they don’t know what to do with it.”? Not a problem, I’ve ever run into myself, but Project 2025 is just that. Billionaires want to be bankers. They want to sell off our governmental oversight to private companies they own.
Here is Project 2025. There isn’t one part of our lives this won’t touch. Think it doesn’t mean you? There is no provision to exclude from its effects those who vote for fascism so choose your candidate wisely.
Here is the part where they will abolish the federal reserve. It will be replaced by currency they can “create” and then lend out at their own interest rates.
“There is no place for political violence” has been a pretty common refrain throughout the weekend. It really got me thinking. ”Political violence” must be one of those “you know it when you see it” types of things.
Let’s see…
🧵👇🏻
Political violence strikes me as a visual medium but there are so many things that occur before we see the blood that I think might be political violence. Are we just numb to it? How do we define what is political violence and what is just violence? Why is it different?
Are Texas Gov Greg Abbott’s razor balls floating in the river, considered “political violence”? Kind of. I mean, the idea is people from south of the US shouldn’t be allowed to come here and take our jobs.
Political.
To deter from this, razor balls in the river.
Violence.
There’s been a lot said about Joe Biden since the debate. I, along with so many of you, watched it play out in real time as respected news transmitters read out ‘inside texts’ from knee jerk reactionaries.
After much thought, I won’t be voting for Joe Biden because he’s old.
🧵👇🏻
I’ll be voting for Joe Biden because he’s team democracy. I’m voting for ideas he represents. I’m voting for the team of people he can put together. I’m voting for my own interests and for your ability to vote for your own interests. I didn’t vote for him last time either, btw.
In 2020, I voted for a November 5th, 2024 election. Joe Biden and Kamala Harris were the only options on the ballot that allowed this. I colored in Joe and Kamala’s bubble to keep the lights on long enough for us to have this election. Like many of you, I voted team democracy.
I am loathe to do predictions. However, there are some things you just can’t help but see coming. Project 2025 is a blinking red alarm and we all need to be aware of the stakes of this election. Please familiarize yourself with EO11246, be discriminating voters.
A wee thread🧵👇🏻
On September 24th, 1965 President Lyndon Johnson signed Executive Order 11246. EO11246 established Equal Opportunity Employment. It includes Non-Discrimination in Government. It includes Non-Discrimination Employment by Government Contractors and Subcontractors.
Focus on Non-Discrimination Employment by Government Contractors and Subcontractors. In Sub Part B under Contractor’s Agreements, contractors agree to not discriminate against employees based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin.
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
Trust me…
🧵👇🏻
The above is the oath the President takes at 12 noon on January 20. Typically, it is administered by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court but there is no law that makes that a requirement. You could have your gran do it. So why is it *usually* the Chief Justice?
For this thread let’s assume the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is there as a symbol of the law. Chief Justice Roberts in a way represents the Judicial Branch of our government on the day it grants power to the person who will symbolize the Executive Branch.