One thing testing positive for 12 $*%&#^# days makes you think about is how often you've walked back into society still contagious with the flu or cold you felt mostly recovered from.
Having a long bout of Omicron really convinced me that there's just no good policy answer for this thing.
It's not mild enough to treat cases as meaningless.
It's so infectious that if you don't really isolate, you give it to everyone.
It is mild enough, for enough people, that the weeks and weeks of isolation it can visit on an (already exhausted) family feels excessive.
The worst policy debates are the ones where there's no actually good answer. That's Omicron.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"If your goal is to win and build sustainable power, throwing $90 million at Amy McGrath for Senate just because she’s taking on Mitch McConnell is not the way to do that," @amandalitman told me. "It just isn’t." nytimes.com/2022/02/01/opi…
A weakness for Democrats, both at the level of funding and at the level of attention, is they're obsessed with national power and have ceded a huge amount of state and local power to the right.
But that's not, at any level sustainable.
It's not sustainable nationally: Elections are administered by states. Congressional districts are drawn by states. The House and Senate bench is built of local and state officials.
“There’s a phrase in Zen Buddhism that comes from a koan, which is, ‘Not knowing is most intimate,’" @ozekiland told me.
"It’s when we don’t know something and when we can sit in that state of not knowing is when there’s a kind of an intimacy with the world around us.”
I love that idea: That the deepest intimacy is knowing a person or thing well enough to recognize they can't truly be known. Feeling you have others fully mapped means you don't know them as well as you think you do.
“In this state of not knowing, curiosity and engagement with the world arises, for lack of a better word. And that engagement, that curiosity is intimate and very, very alive."
Department of depressing juxtapositions, NYT trending edition:
The first piece there is my column, about Biden’s supply-side crises and mistakes, where I write:
The second is an extremely popular, helpful article on avoiding counterfeit masks, which would be unnecessary if the supply chain for good masks was clearer, and if you could just get them free from the gov. nytimes.com/article/covid-…
I've seen a lot of people link to my piece with Tip O'Neill's old aphorism that "all politics is local."
I don't think that's quite right. It's that local politics is increasingly national. nytimes.com/2022/01/09/opi…
I talked with @JakeMGrumbach for the piece, who's forthcoming book, "Laboratories Against Democracy," is all about this. He had a line I didn't end up getting into the column, but have been thinking about since:
As he put it, this moment is unique in how much "national conflict is playing out through subnational institutions."
It reminds me of the old line about war: Amateurs talk strategy; professionals talk logistics. Right now, Trumpists are talking logistics.
“These local races that determine the mechanics of American democracy are the ventilation shaft in the Republican death star. These races get zero national attention. They hardly get local attention. Turnout is often lower than 20%.” - @benwikler