The least surprising "surprising answer" in history. Social trust is the foundation of *anything* a society wants to accomplish. The lack of social trust is why so many aspects of US policy are cruel & shitty, and why the US is currently falling apart. washingtonpost.com/world/2022/02/…
The fun thing about reading social science on social trust is that the consensus is basically, "yes, this is the secret sauce that enables literally any society to accomplish literally anything. Also we have no idea how it's created or how to restore it or how it works. Whee!"
The last five or six decades have see an organized, billionaire-funded assault on social trust. That's what right-wing media IS; that is its essence. A lower-trust society is a cruel, inequitable, dog-eat-dog environment in which oligarchs can prosper.
This is also, as a million scholars have written, the go-to strategy of every aspiring autocrat. It's why they all go after media first. Destroy social trust -- convince the masses society's institutions are failing, lying, turning against them -- & people will seek a strongman.
This obviously becomes easier when society's institutions ARE faltering. The real puzzle, the thing no one understands, is how to restore social trust once it has begun crumbling. After all, you need social trust to make reforms in the first place! Chicken/egg, etc.
One final point, the relevance of which I hope is obvious: I've really started thinking that the future of this country rides on whether the people behind the 1/6 insurrection are held accountable. If this too gets washed away in a both-sides blur, that's pretty much it for us.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
OK, the GOP has *formally stated* that it believes political violence in service of conservative political power is legitimate.
Can we stop "debating" this shit now?
I'm on hold with the WA Dept. of Revenue -- have been for an hour! -- so I might as well tweet a thread while I wait. Let's talk about two different ways of conceiving legitimacy. What is its source? From whence does legitimacy derive?
One way to see it: moral & social legitimacy derive from a set of principles that apply to to all tribes & factions alike. A tribe's actions are legitimate insofar as they accord with those principles. So, eg, "it's bad to torture," no matter who's doing the torturing.
I continue to find Covid discourse baffling. On one hand more people are dying than ever; on the other, VSPs are soberly nodding & telling us that the time for mitigation measures is over. washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/…
One familiar part of the Covid discourse: the right is engaged in a massive, coordinated attempt to lie about vaccines so that more people will go unvaxxed & die, thus hurting Biden politically -- & the media's approach is, "why isn't Biden dealing with this sabotage better?"
You know how, once you see the Energizer bunny in the moon, you can't un-see it? Once you start noticing how many criticisms of Dems amount to "why aren't they dealing better w/ RW fuckery?" or "why haven't they made RWers be less shitty?" you can't un-see it.
This @PeterBeinart piece reminds me: there has never in my adult life been a "cancel culture" stronger, with more ability to impose real personal & professional punishment, than the bloodthirsty elite consensus in favor of war with Iraq in the early 2000s. peterbeinart.substack.com/p/nationalism-…
The hysterical political & media elite response to the US withdrawal from Afghanistan showed that the hawkish & vengeful US foreign policy "blob" not only has suffered no consequences for its serial disasters -- it's as powerful as ever. Now it's beating Ukraine war drums.
And it is going to drag us steadily into an unnecessary & self-destructive posture of belligerence toward China.
The thought I keep coming back to is that Covid put the US under stress & basically exposed what a sad-sack crumbling empire we are. Failing institutions, weak leaders, selfishness, ignorance, denial, scapegoating, and whining, whining, whining, whining, whining.
Over & over again, the usual suspects try to do what they do -- blame everything on vague soft distant meddling "elites" & their immigrant armies -- only to find that the virus is just a virus & doesn't give a shit who owned who on cable & just keeps killing people.
Today on Volts: to reach net-zero carbon emissions, the US must decarbonize tens of millions of buildings. Sounds tricky! I talk to @panamaredhat, head of the @BuildingDecarb Coalition, about the biggest challenges, including your stupid gas stove. volts.wtf/p/volts-podcas…
To be clear, it's me, not Panama, calling your gas stove stupid. It is stupid, though.
Ah, the very first line of today's post contains a stupid error! So fun. To clarify: the *direct + indirect* emissions of buildings are about 30% of the US total. Direct emissions -- the subject of the post -- are only around 10%. Correction in post: volts.wtf/p/volts-podcas…
"There’s a part of me that feels like the only way we get to major structural reform is for the Rs to win unified gov't in 2025 & then just overreach incredibly. ... I mean, that’s my optimistic case at this point: that the ’20s will be a decade of decline and then renewal." 😞
All right all right everyone, chill out. I don't want to speak for Lee, but I think this is more morbid humor than real accelerationism. Less "this is something to want or expect" & more "this is literally the only positive outcome I can even dream up at this point."