southpaw Profile picture
Feb 4 9 tweets 2 min read
I feel so strangely disconnected from pretty much the entirety of Covid discourse I see. I thought I’d offer my own testimony in a thread, mostly to see if it’s familiar to anyone else.
In my little slice of the world, when Omicron came in mid-December and testing lines started stretching down the blocks, govt officials were pretty adamant that they would not be reimposing mitigation measures like indoor dining restrictions. But some restaurants closed anyway.
I was planning to fly to California to see my family over the holidays, so I voluntarily cut out a lot of activities—indoor dining, movie theaters, etc.—but no one ordered me to. And obv I could still travel from a place with lots of Omicron to a place with less.
On the plane back from CA, I started feeling sick with a sore throat and a productive cough. I never developed a fever and I never tested positive across several PCR and rapid tests, so I don’t think it was Omicron, but I isolated myself anyway—again voluntarily.
By the time I re-emerged, we were at about the peak of the wave on the new cases graph. Outdoor masks were back in a big way (I think part of this is that they’re pretty comfortable in cold weather) but indoor dining was still open, just not very popular. Deaths were on the rise.
All of which is to say that, while my life has been somewhat disrupted through omicron, I’ve not ever felt like there was much in the way of official restrictions on what I could do.
And it’s so odd to me that we’re looking a wave of thousands of daily deaths and, for some reason, policy makers think what they need to do is tell people to get back to normal even harder.
People here, from what I’ve seen, have taken their own and their families’ and their neighbors’ health and safety in hand while policy makers have done nothing.
In New York City, I think it’s safe now to say they did a reasonably good job. But the rest of the country is still really suffering, and encouraging others to do more rather than less to protect their loved ones has been nowhere in the discussion as far as I can see.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with southpaw

southpaw Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nycsouthpaw

Jan 28
Charitably, you’ve based this on nothing.
Kennedy: I don’t know about this 15-part balancing test, Stephen. Is it statistically based?

O’Connor: Where do you see undue burden in this data?

Breyer: You need to look at the regressions I’ve done on tabs 4-19, summarized on 20.

Kennedy: Ahh

O’Connor: Oh this is beautiful
Pace Politico, no conservatives joined Breyer’s opinion in June Medical Services. The Chief Justice filed a concurrence, and every other conservative dissented.

Kennedy joined in WWH v. Hellerstedt, but he also wrote part of the decision in Casey before Breyer was on the Court.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 26
Prince Andrew has filed his answer in the lawsuit by Virginia Giuffre that he was unable to get dismissed. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
The Prince's admissions:
- He met Epstein c. 1999
- Epstein and Maxwell attended his 40th bday
- He's been on Epstein's plane, stayed at his island, and at three of his other residences.
- He did the 2019 Newsnight interview.
- He pledged to assist the US criminal investigation.
In order to understand the answer, you have to read it side by side with the complaint: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…. It's what you'd expect, but this sequence has me scratching my head a little. (Complaint / Answer)
Read 6 tweets
Jan 19
Here’s the Supreme Court’s opinion shutting down Trump’s effort to block the 1/6 committee. Justice Thomas would’ve granted the application; Justice Kavanaugh filed a lengthy statement (which I’ve not yet read). supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf…
While granting the 1/6 committee what it needs, the Court has largely hollowed out the DC Circuit’s opinion in the case, criticizing it for reaching the question of the effect of Trump’s status as a former president when it had already held none of his privilege claims would fly.
Then Kavanaugh goes a step further and says if they had reached the question of Trump’s status he would’ve voted the other way, which takes some of the sting out of the criticism of the court below for writing a bunch of dicta.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 19
NY AG: TRUMP TRIPPED UP BY TRIPLING TRIPLEX ag.ny.gov/press-release/…
Eric Trump, asked to explain valuations of the Seven Springs property that exceeded independent appraisals by 10x, repeatedly took the Fifth. ag.ny.gov/sites/default/…
Ivanka Trump kept getting options to purchase apartments in Trump Park Avenue that were around 1/3 the company’s estimate of their value.
Read 8 tweets
Jan 15
Some amazing photos in this account of the eruption from Tongan geologists. matangitonga.to/2022/01/15/ton…
If I understand the timing correctly, these were taken on Friday local time, well before the massive explosion that sent shockwaves around the globe, which happened shortly before sunset on Saturday in Tonga.
That Tongan news site, as best I can tell, hasn’t posted an update since the large explosion.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 14
I don’t think it’s right to categorize this as executive unilateralism. Congress granted a clear authority to address grave dangers in the workplace to the agency in the OSH Act and Richard Nixon signed it. The conservative movement has never liked it but it’s a duly enacted law.
The extraordinary scope of the vaccine mandate arises from the pandemic itself being an extraordinary once-a-century sort of thing (knock on wood), not from it being a strained interpretation of the law.
But the court’s conservatives have jumped at the chance to entrench a fairly novel and, imo, deeply unwise principle (“major questions” doctrine) that it’s somehow wrong to adapt existing law to new and unforeseen circumstances and so you must go back to Congress.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(