1/ The “Omicron is mild narrative” is simply untrue and hugely harmful!
Scientists, doctors, experts and everyone else need to take responsibility for the harm done when minimising Covid - death and disability.
Thread 🧵
2/ There is no doubt that in the absence of boosters Omicron is a brutal infection for a significant number of people.
Still, for the majority it will pass without the need for medical care and recovery will be relatively uneventful. But some will have life-changing illness….
3/ There is no way of predicting who will get severe disease. The myth that Covid only affects older adults has been debunked in 2020.
All adults have the same increase in risk of death from Covid (figure).
But vaccines and access to healthcare change that risk.
[BMJ]
4/ Vaccines and access to healthcare make substantial reductions in deaths and disability…
Even with good booster cover Omicron can cause severe disease, death, disability, and can buckle a nation’s health service.
A good example is the U.K. where booster coverage reached 50%, yet a surge of Omicron admissions led to many patients dying due to delays in accessing care
6/ But good vaccine cover is a complete game changer. Individual risk with Covid falls dramatically and the impact on other health conditions also falls dramatically.
7/ Without vaccine cover and we are back to March 2020. Fail to boost the population and we are back in high risk territory.
It is on a knifes edge. And will be until we get pan-coronavirus vaccines and widespread availability of effective treatments.
8/ To talk about “Omicron is mild” or we can get “back to normal” fails to appreciate the fragility of the “decoupling” we have achieved between infection, admissions, death, and disability. People start thinking the disease itself is mild. This is wrong and dangerous!
9/ The US is a prime example where Death is being caused by misinformation.
A deeply polarised nation with a number of prominent politicians, scientists, physicians and influencers either denying Covid or trying to minimise it. Yet, the death toll is staggering:
10/ And much of this is due to the failure of getting the public to accept boosters.
Other wealthy nations achieved a surge in booster doses, the Uptake in the US has been very poor.
11/ And the consequence is a consistently higher death rate. More Americans are dying than in other wealthy nations.
12/ The U.K. is also now suffering from the “disease is mild” narrative effect on vaccine uptake.
Despite more than half not having had a booster, numbers of vaccines are falling
13/ Not helped by media outlets confidently reporting how mild Omicron was as early as the 1st of Dec, despite having no evidence to support such claims.
14/ And even more reliable sources fell into the “milder” narrative
15/ The truth was of course very different. Omicron is more severe than the original Covid, the one that had a 30% inpatient fatality rate and ground society to a halt. The difference, it is more infectious.
15/ What a responsible and fact-checked media should have reported is “a new variant has emerged but vaccines seem to provide protection”.
Indeed, “a new, more infectious variant has emerged, but vaccines seem to provide protection”.
But in fairness, the narrative from leadership was similar and several eminent scientists failed to put the less deaths into context.
Leaders should have been honest. “We can’t keep shutting down society, but we will do the best we can”. Instead, “milder” “we will cope” freedom
Some scientists have pushed the narrative further, despite knowing it has been vaccines and treatments that have made the difference not a lucky mutation to SARS2 or “natural evolutionary mildness”.
It creates the illusion of scientific discrepancy…a choice of what to believe
19/ In fact the vast vast majority of scientists are in complete agreement…even the “Omicron is milder” crowd.
▪️Omicron is a serious infectious disease!
▪️without vaccines Omicron would be devastating!
20/ There are a handful of scientists who have went down the rabbit hole of confirmation bias and giddy optimism or conspiracy.
Actual scientists fail when we don’t provide a united front over the basics and succinctly refute such unsubstantiated theories.
21/ Omicron is a serious infectious disease. It kills more than any other infection. Any sense it is “milder” is a slight of hand, achieved through years of research and clinical experience. For it’s true severity to show itself it need only complacency.
The issue of restrictions/protections/mitigations is separate to the key scientific facts. Offering our view on them is one thing, allowing our preference for more or less to interfere with the core narrative that Omicron is serious enough to get vaccinated is an entirely other.
22/ The “it’s mild” and “it’s over” argument is irrelevant at best and simply educated speculation at worst. And the harsh truth is that arguing it is mild and it is over actually costs lives.
People are dying because they believe it is mild. They don’t have to!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I need to tell you where the trap is in relation to the NHS
Both Streeting & Starmer have committed to keeping the NHS “free at the point of use”…
But that can look like many different things
🧵
1/x
For example, currently you can see your GP, get referred for a colonoscopy, be seen in a private hospital, and not be charged a penny. Technically, free at the point of care, even though it has cost us all more money to deliver that care.
So, Starmer and Streeting could expand this…allowing even more “NHS patients” to use the private sector but paid for with public money, with money taken directly from the NHS budget in fact.
Big news is that access to GPs in the U.K. was one of the best
Yes, you read that right…
“This places the UK among the better-performing nations with respect to same- or next-day appointments, with only the Netherlands (50%) and Germany (49%) significantly higher.”
This access may be coming at a cost though!
The UK scored poorly on “time spent” with appointments
No surprise given most countries run at 15-20 minute appointments versus the UKs 10 mins.
In 2013 85% of people felt the GP spent enough time. It’s now 58%
Given some so called patriots want a French healthcare system, let’s take a look at it.
🧵
Summary: social insurance with 95% of people taking private healthcare to cover copays. Costs £40bn per year more. Less equitable than NHS, but can turn a profit
1/10
Akin to some other European countries, France uses a social insurance based model predominantly - where employer and employee pay a means-tested insurance premium
but unlike most EU countries the French people pay a surcharge on pretty much everything they access or use
This has led to 95% of the population taking out private insurance.
This is an insurance premium (on top of the social insurance premium) that is in part based on likelihood of needing health care - older people paying more.
Some good policies but overall disappointing and a bit concerning.
A summary thread
1/x
1. There is the title: Build an NHS Fit for the Future
In one way, fair enough. Buildings are outdated and crumbling and IT is hopeless
But, Labour seems oblivious to the fact the NHS leads the world in medical and surgical care. The issue is merely access not tech upgrades.
2. "publicly owned and funded" is meaningless. Even the deranged health system of the U.S. has a publicly funded component - waiting lists are horrendous and access to treatment is very limited.
We want universal access to all available treatments - quite different!