@CliveAndrews@ratracecycles People that are taking risks that are sufficient that they feel they need to wear helmets are not welcome to work for us - because our vehicles are heavy and could cause harm, and because we carry small children on our bikes.
Instead - we systematically work to reduce risk.(1/n)
2) Extremely high level of training, on an ongoing basis.
3) Near Miss reporting - we track near misses, and minor injuries, and tackle the causative factors.
(2/n)
@CliveAndrews@ratracecycles For e.g. 1 our biggest source of injuries was bungee pings, so we eliminated bungees and now use dead inner tubes instead, which don't have a hook which could cause harm at the end.
e.g. 2 We retrofitted all bikes with more powerful brakes because of some brake fade incidents.
We know that increasing helmet wearing rates make cycling more dangerous per mile - although there are confounding factors here, this indicates that overall they do not provide a strong protective effect in the round - otherwise the opposite effect.
@CliveAndrews@ratracecycles Extensive reading of the literature suggests that this is because while helmets definitely help in the event of a crash, that risk compensation results in more collisions. So riders wearing helmets take greater risks, and those driving around them take greater risks too.
A major cause of head injuries is going over the handlebars, which is not possible with a 3 metre long bike.
Another thing that makes us unique is our training systems, maintenance systems, and ability to track poor rider behaviour.
@CliveAndrews@ratracecycles We observe that companies that use helmets while wearing cargo bikes seem to be much more likely to jump red lights and take greater risks in general, as we might expect from risk compensation.
@CliveAndrews@ratracecycles Overall the vast majority of injuries to our riders occur off the bike, which we know because of our near miss and incident reporting - and that's our focus for tackling danger.
As @Chris_Boardman says: "Helmets not even in top 10 of things that keep cycling safe"
We're particularly keen to help @metpoliceuk crack down on harrassment and assault on the street as this is something that is not common, but does happen and we don't think it's acceptable.
They have not appeared particularly interested.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is your non-regular reminder that *we’re at non-trivial risk of making ourselves extinct* and certainly about to make the world a lot more hostile for us to live on unless you act.
Yes you.
There’s no room for non-participants.
You’re either part of the positive change to help us avoid climate change or you’re part of the problem.
Do not sit this one out and live with the regret in 20 years time.
There’s something called “safety in numbers” - more people walking or cycling makes walking or cycling safer. The main barrier to walking and cycling more? Safety.
But there’s more - there are also infrastructure and social dynamics putting people off.
So if one person rides more, other people walk/cycle more too.
This then means that in balance situations, decisions are more likely to come down on the side of changes which help still more walking and cycling - LTNs, cycle tracks, bus gates and the like.
In December, our riders covered close to 25,000km. We've been loud about cargo bikes being the most efficient way of doing logistics in cities. They're also the most CO2 efficient technology. Last month, we saved about 6t of CO2 just by doing our job.
Thread & article below 🧵
2/7 Electric vehicles are painted as the future of urban mobility by many. To us, it's clear they won't solve congestion, pollution, road safety, or give back the living space that's given to cars.
in our article, we compare their CO2 emissions with bikes pedalme.co.uk/carbon-emissio…
3/7 Electric vans emit ~32x more CO2 through manufacturing than our bikes (8800kg vs 280kg). Choosing to move things in big metal boxes comes at a cost, and that starts from the moment we start building them.
The potential of cargo bikes for large scale logistics is still mostly misunderstood. To break it down, we looked at the data from the Pedal Me fleet in London in September. Read our report on the future of urban mobility. Summary thread below 🧵⬇⬇⬇
We analysed ~19,000 km of GPS data from our cargo bikes. Our average moving speed in central london was 15kmh. That's 3.5kmh faster than traffic speeds in 2018. Note that congestion this year was up 153% compared to last year so likely even faster..
2/🧵
Beyond competitive moving speeds, e-cargo bikes don't have to waste time looking for parking space. Parking is a huge burden for delivery vans (studies say between 9-15 minutes), usually with additional walking to the final delivery, frequent fines and regular traffic blocks.