I wrote about the effort to both-sides current threats to American democracy, focusing on Ross Douthat's claim that liberal belief in expertise is akin to right-wing populism. 1/ donmoynihan.substack.com/p/at-least-its…
Douthat's core argument is summarized below: right-wing populism is democratic in ways that liberalism is not. This is, I think both wrong and misleading. It understands the anti-democratic nature of populism and the value of expertise to successful democratic societies. 2/
Douthat picks three examples of how expertise is at odds with democracy, all of which fail in some fundamental way. First, libs want you to listen to Anthony Fauci and public health guidelines. Well...3/ donmoynihan.substack.com/p/at-least-its…
Second: school officials are ignoring parents. Here Douthat restates the messaging of a large-scale right-wing effort to assert control over schools, often by ignoring the claims of minority students and free speech/due process rights of education officials. Not v. democratic! 4/
Finally and weirdly, Douthat raises Ireland running multiple referenda on a key EU treaty (first voting no, then yes) as proof of expert dominance of a democracy. But a) EU membership has been historically popular in Ireland, leaving b/c of a single referenda would upend that..5/
b) referenda often have weird dynamics. The Irish govt got reassurances on abortion/military neutrality issues that drove the no vote, which is how democracy is supposed to work. A second landslide referenda w higher turnout based on better info seems democratic! 6/
Again, we have a direct counterfactual, right next door to Ireland, of a populist referenda on the EU. From an Irish point of view, Brexit turned out to be a disaster for the UK (and Ireland) and helped increase support for the EU. 7/ donmoynihan.substack.com/p/at-least-its…
Sometimes it's not that complicated: the people threatening democracy are the ones who say free and fair elections are illegitimate, attempted a coup, and are seeking to control the machinery of elections so they can succeed next time. It's not Anthony Fauci or schoolteachers. 8/
As populism has become more extreme among its supporters, the GOP response has been to normalize rather than reject it. The party and the movement seems unable to fix itself. 9/ nytimes.com/2022/02/04/us/…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The connections are pretty clear. Leonard Leo of the Federalist Society helped bankroll the work of Ginni Thomas. He also arranged for Clarence Thomas to attend Koch fundraisers. propublica.org/article/claren…
The shared purpose of Leonard Leo, Ginni Thomas, Clarence Thomas and the Koch network was to put right-wing judges on the court. And Clarence Thomas used his public position on the court to raise money for that.
Clarence Thomas used to support the Chevron doctrine, which allows delegation to administrative expertise. But the people who fund the Koch network can't buy off administrators, so they want to remove their influence from the process. Now Thomas agrees with the donors.
Also this guy: young people today can't afford a house because they occasionally buy new clothes
If the people @FinancialReview care for free speech at all, they will do the decent thing and allow replies to this tweet, allowing a full and frank exchange of views.
America has 22 times the firearm homicide rates as the European Union.
We are less safe and less free because of how available guns are in this country. healthdata.org/news-events/in…
America makes up about 15% of gun homicides, and together with five other countries constitutes half of gun homicides in the world. vox.com/2018/8/29/1779…
The reason more people in America are dying from guns is because there are more guns in America.
America is the only country with more guns than people. cnn.com/2021/11/26/wor…
New, from me: I wrote about how the emerging debacle at New College (one-third of faculty gone, students can't find classes, housed in airport hotels) reflects the incompetence of populists like DeSantis.
Competence, the ability to perform organizational core tasks, is an underrated quality. It is an especially overlooked quality by people who value other things, like ideological goals, or believe that existing institutions are corrupt, or who have never actually run things.
Fuck Around (left, celebrating the firing of a faculty who criticized the Regents)
and
Find Out: (right, soliciting faculty applications because you don't have enough to teach classes - one-third have left for some reason).
The DeSantis takeover of New College was meant to offer a model of a conservative-run higher ed.
The result is chaos, which is what happens when incompetent people who don't actually care about organizational mission take over public services. insidehighered.com/news/students/…
The NY Times recently featured Chris Rufo to explain how DEI was undermining liberal education.
You know what actually undermines a liberal education?
Losing one-third of faculty.
Not offering core classes to students.
Raging incompetence and blind indifference.
Rufo is seeking to personally recruit replacements. Which is completely at odds with what university trustees are supposed to do. No way that could go wrong, right?
From the internal Texas A&M reports: it was A&M Regents who signaled their opposition to McElroy, at which point the university figured out they would not tenure her.
Seems like the Regents cost A&M $1M. Nice job.
: ... tamus.edu/wp-content/up
Not great when a university President is saying "I'm assuming all texts were deleted" and then tells faculty she was not involved in hiring process. (She has since resigned).