Seth Cotlar Profile picture
Feb 4 6 tweets 2 min read
YAF, an organization on the right edge of the GOP, cut ties with Malkin in 2019 because she was too far right for them.
For context, THIS is just a sampling of the speakers they currently find acceptable. Not exactly a high bar.
Their list of recommended books contains a few doozies as well.
Here’s a thread on someone who attended the founding meeting of YAF at Bill Buckley’s home in 1960. Again, not a super high bar historically.
In 2021 Malkin attended the nation’s most prominent white nationalist conference that drew people like the guy second from the left. Is being criticized for attending conferences swimming with avowed neo-Nazis “guilt by association?”
That picture comes from this story the SPLC just broke today. This is why Tucker hates that organization, because they keep writing accurate stories about his deplorable friends and allies. splcenter.org/hatewatch/2022…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Seth Cotlar

Seth Cotlar Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SethCotlar

Feb 6
One part of Rogan's impact on American society that I haven't seen mentioned much is the key role he played early on in helping the Proud Boys promote themselves using his platform. Spotify has removed his interviews with PB founder McInnes, like they have with the n-word. Image
Screen shot is from this article. rollingstone.com/culture/cultur…
Read 11 tweets
Feb 5
It seems highly likely that this was the playbook. This was the strategy the far right street fighters in Portland tried to use to get Trump to bring feds into the city to put down "the violent left."
Here's a Proud Boy allied far right figure in the summer of 2019 telling folks on FB to tag Cruz and Trump in everything they post. Their goal was to get Antifa labeled a "domestic terrorist" group so that federal force could be brought in against them.
Their "1st Amendment" protests were entirely aimed at generating selectively edited footage of "the violent left" that propagandists like Andy Ng0 and Fox News could broadcast into the White House to justify bringing federal force to bear in Portland.
Read 9 tweets
Feb 5
Yesterday the GOP declared that violently storming the US Capitol to overturn an election is “legitimate political discourse.” Currently, on the WaPo app, it takes 7 scrolls to get to a story that mentions that. ImageImageImageImage
Ah, there we go. That lede is buried in the story on Liz Cheney. ImageImageImage
Thank goodness, however, that we get to see Thiessen, one of the most mendacious public figures out there, attacking those who track racist hate groups and McArdle telling us to stop being so outraged…the DAY AFTER the GOP officially condoned political violence.
Read 7 tweets
Feb 4
A regular reminder that at any time, any time at all, GOP elites in elected office & prominent "conservatives" in the media can disaffiliate from the GOP and urge others to never vote for a Republican again until the party retracts its endorsement of domestic terrorism.
Parties will sometimes endorse things individuals disagree with. That's normal. But also, sometimes parties can step over a clear line that is simply unacceptable. And in that situation, if one does not act, one becomes complicit with that line crossing behavior.
Republicans have agency. It's not just up to the ~70% of Americans who are not Republicans to deal with the problem of the radicalized GOP.
Read 10 tweets
Feb 3
"Every constitution...naturally expires at the end of 19 years. If it be enforced longer, it is an act of force, and not of right." Thomas Jefferson writing to James Madison, 6 September 1789. jeffersonpapers.princeton.edu/selected-docum…
For more on Jefferson's anti-originalism, via Peter Onuf's insightful analysis of the subject.
You can agree or disagree with TJ's take on the Constitution (James Madison sure didn't buy it in its entirety in 1789), but anyone who knows anything about the founding era would know that it's not "spitting in the face" of the founders to talk about Constitutions evolving.
Read 7 tweets
Feb 3
I’ll see your aphorism that “the answer to speech you don’t like is more speech” and raise you “Falsehood flies, and the Truth comes limping after it” by Jonathan Swift, 1710.
One of our two major parties has created an almost hermetically sealed media universe into which alternative perspectives and empirical reality have little chance of entering, and you think the solution is just to talk into that void more loudly?
I don’t know what the solution to our propaganda-warped political culture is, but I’m pretty sure publishing essays in magazines and tweeting more ain’t it.
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(