One of my woodworking mentors frequently says that to design and build furniture you need to be able to draw it. This is particularly the case if you find it challenging to conceive of how designs work in three dimensions, especially if they have moving parts.
2/ My wife is a therapist specializing in grief. Since spring of 2020 her sessions have been by zoom. For her birthday last year I made her a small table/bench specially designed for conducting therapy sessions by zoom.
3/ But she now needed one that could be put away between sessions. Since there’s really not enough space to have another piece of furniture. So for her birthday this year I wanted to design one that was collapsible and could be stored. This turned out to be very challenging.
4/ As I said above, figuring out how the pieces move together and interact was very challenging for me. Three dimensions is harder than two. And movement in three dimensions even more so.
5/ The joinery itself turned out to be pretty simple. But thinking through the design and keeping in my head how the different measurements interacted with each other was not. Not for me. It was fascinating though how drawing the different pieces made it possible reason it out.
Not sure how these got disconnected but here’s the rest of the thread
Times reports that Jan 6th committee is being dangerously aggressive and isn't living up to the standard of the House Benghazi probe. nytimes.com/2022/02/05/us/…
I hadn’t spoken to Todd Gitlin in some time. But I think I can say that he was a friend. Todd was a deeply humane, learned and funny guy. He was one of those people who had a deeply moral engagement with the world over a long life, much of it on the public stage.
2/ I remember back in the 90s when I was trying to figure out what I was doing and whether I wanted to leave what I was doing and become a writer I was reading a piece by him in Salon. It was about political media culture. And he had this line that this media …
3/ culture was premised on making citizens “cognoscenti of their own bamboozlement.” By which he meant that this media culture … well you know what he meant. And I read that and thought God I want to write phrases like that. I really want to do this. I want to be like that.
Not a self-awareness guy:"I confess I dont think that strategy is going to work at all. There will not be Nuremberg-like justice being meted out over mask mandates. Ever. Im still of the belief that most pandemic excesses were due to panic, not plotted." nationalreview.com/2022/01/what-i…
2/ He's a reasonable person apparently because he thinks in most cases govts and school boards did mask mandates to control COVID rather than as a plot to end liberty. Thanks, dude. He, a writer-controversialist, is at least reassured by the fact that this battle is ...
3/ "professionals versus workers". And he's one of the workers. He'll probably be forming an NRO union soon given that level of class consciousness. Clearly masking is a highly divisive issue in our society. Plenty of people are done with it. But what I keep coming back ...
I'm amazed that they're going this route. Cawthorn's lawyer: "Congress passed the 1872 Amnesty Act, which removed all persons whatsoever from the disability under Section 3 as a result of engaging in an insurrection or rebellion." talkingpointsmemo.com/news/madison-c… via @TPM
2/ First of all this appears to grant, at least as matter of argument that Cawthorn committed rebellion against the United States. I haven't looked at the specific statute but I'm pretty certain it applied to THAT rebellion. Not future acts of whackadoodle bullshit.
3/ I'm not even sure that would be possible inasmuch as that would in effect be amending the amendment and you can't do this with a statute. I'm not holding my breath that Cawthorn is going to be barred from running. But this is a far more entertaining defense than I ...