10-K Diver Profile picture
Feb 5, 2022 28 tweets 9 min read Read on X
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll show you how to read and understand a company's Balance Sheet.

As investors, we should be able to judge businesses by looking at their financial statements.

And the Balance Sheet, of course, is 1 of 3 key financial statements: Image
2/

Imagine that Alice and Bob are neighbors.

Alice owns and operates a "candles" business.

She makes candles in her loft, which she's converted into a lab of sorts.

She then takes the candles to a local home goods store, which sells them and pays her at the end of each month.
3/

Suppose it costs Alice $10 to make a candle. This is the cost of the candle's glass case, wax, wick, etc.

And suppose the home goods store pays Alice $15/candle, and sells 1460 of her candles every month.

Then, Alice would make ~$87.6K/year. Here's her Income Statement: Image
4/

Let's now turn to Bob, Alice's neighbor.

Bob owns and runs a "burrito" business.

Each morning, he makes 120 burritos. He takes these burritos to a busy street corner at lunch time, and sells them.

On the way back home, he buys groceries to make the next day's burritos.
5/

Suppose it costs Bob $4 to make a burrito. This is the cost of the tortilla, the rice, the beans, etc.

And suppose Bob sells his burritos for $6 apiece.

Then, Bob would also make $87.6K/year.

Here's *his* Income Statement: Image
6/

Of course, these models are *highly* simplified.

Both Alice and Bob probably have several other costs -- insurance, permits, taxes, etc.

But to learn key concepts, it's useful to study such "bare bones" examples -- stripped of all extraneous details.

So, stick with me!
7/

Here's a question.

Whose business is "better": Alice's or Bob's?

As we've seen above, both businesses have *exactly* the same annual Revenues ($262.8K), Costs ($175.2K), Profits ($87.6K), and Margins (~33.33%).

So, economically speaking, aren't these businesses identical?
8/

The answer is NO.

Why?

Because, even though these businesses produce identical *earnings* for their owners each year, they require different amounts of *capital* to do so.

That is, these businesses have identical Income Statements. But very different *Balance Sheets*.
9/

For example, Alice's business requires her to invest $10/candle * 1460 candles = $14.6K of capital into it at the outset.

Once she *puts in* this $14.6K to make her candles, she gets to *take out* $7.3K/month ($87.6K/year) from the business ($5 profit/candle * 1460 candles).
10/

What about Bob?

Well, following the same logic, Bob only needs to *put in* $480 of capital ($4/burrito * 120 burritos).

And once he does that, he gets to *take out* $240 *daily* ($2 profit/burrito * 120 burritos) -- which adds up to $87.6K over a year.
11/

Clearly, Bob's is the "better" business.

First, it requires *less* capital ($480 vs Alice's $14.6K) to produce the *same* annual earnings ($87.6K).

Second, it *turns* this capital *daily* vs Alice's *monthly* -- allowing Bob to take out $240/day vs Alice's $7.3K/month.
12/

That's why it's important to study ALL the financial statements of a business -- not just its Income Statement.

In particular, studying the *Assets* side of the *Balance Sheet* tells us how much capital a business needs to conduct its operations.
13/

Here's the *Assets* side of Alice's balance sheet, as her business cycles through various states.

As we can see, the Assets on this Balance Sheet NEVER drop below $14.6K -- the *minimum* amount of capital this business needs to function. Image
14/

Compare that to the Assets on Bob's Balance Sheet, and we immediately see that Bob's business requires only $480 to function -- very modest compared to Alice's $14.6K.

High quality businesses require only a small amount of *assets* per dollar of *earnings* produced. Image
15/

Alice's and Bob's businesses are both "simple". They only need "working capital" assets -- cash, receivables, and inventory.

In addition to these, real world businesses typically also need fixed assets (eg, property, plant, and equipment), goodwill, intangibles, etc.
16/

For example, here are the Assets listed on Home Depot's and Starbucks's Balance Sheets (which I took from their latest 10-Qs).

These Asset sections have more line items. But the fundamental principles are still the same as Alice's and Bob's simple businesses. ImageImage
17/

So, that's the *Assets* side of the Balance Sheet. It tells us how much capital a business needs (and has) to function.

Every Balance Sheet also has a *Liabilities* side. This tells us *where* all this capital in the business *comes from*.
18/

There are 3 main "sources" of capital in a business: Equity, Debt, and Float.

Equity is capital *put up* by the business's owners.

Debt is capital *borrowed* by the business -- on which it typically pays interest.
19/

And Float is capital that various parties (eg, suppliers, customers, employees, the government, etc.) have provided to the business -- typically for free.

For example, a supplier may sell raw materials to the business on credit. A customer may pre-pay for an order. Etc. Image
20/

So, that's what the Liabilities side of the Balance Sheet does. It breaks down the capital in the business by *source* -- into Equity, Debt, and Float.

For example, here's how the Liabilities listed on Home Depot's and Starbucks's Balance Sheets break down: ImageImage
21/

And because the *Assets* and the *Liabilities* sides of the Balance Sheet are just two different ways of slicing and dicing the *same* capital, they both have to add up to the same total.

In other words, the Balance Sheet has to "balance". Duh! ImageImage
22/

So, why should we study the Liabilities side?

After all, $1 of capital is $1 of capital, right? Why do we care whether it's Equity, Debt, or Float?

The answer is: businesses can boost returns for their owners by deploying someone else's capital for the owners' benefit.
23/

For example, suppose Alice made a deal with her suppliers that she'd pay them *after* she herself got paid by the home goods store.

Then, she wouldn't need to put up $14.6K of her own money. She could put up $0, and still take out $87.6K per year! Image
24/

That's the power of Float.

It's essentially *free money* that can transform ordinary businesses into extraordinary ones.

No wonder Warren Buffett is such a big fan!

From his 2009 letter: Image
25/

And it's not just Float that provides this kind of "leverage".

The other non-Equity source of capital -- Debt -- can do so too. But Debt can also increase risk and make a business fragile -- usually to a larger extent than Float.

For more:
26/

Please join me tomorrow (Sun, Feb 06) at 1pm ET for a new Money Concepts episode to discuss all things Balance Sheet.

Hope to see you there!

Link: callin.com/link/qmdxVokwNO
27/

About Money Concepts

We're a virtual investing club. Our goal is to help each other become better investors.

We meet Sundays at 1pm ET via @getcallin, to discuss all things investing.

Join us. Get the app. Subscribe. Tell your friends.

It's FREE.

callin.com/show/money-con…
28/

The Balance Sheet is such a key statement. I hope this thread showed you both *why* and *how* to read one.

If you're still with me, thank you very much! You're an Asset to my Twitter experience, and for that I'm in your Debt.

Please stay safe. Enjoy your weekend!

/End

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 10-K Diver

10-K Diver Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @10kdiver

Jan 1, 2023
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through "Gambler's Ruin".

This is a classic exercise in probability theory.

But going beyond the math, this exercise can teach us a lot about life, business, and investing.
2/

In my mind, Gambler's Ruin is the math of "David vs Goliath" ("Skill vs Size") type situations.

Here, David is a "small" player. He only has limited resources. But he's very skilled.

Pitted against David is Goliath -- a "big" player who has MORE resources but LESS skill.
3/

The battle between David and Goliath rages on for several "rounds".

Each round has a "winner" -- either David or Goliath.

David -- because of his superior skill -- has a higher probability of winning any individual round. That's David's advantage over Goliath.
Read 32 tweets
Dec 11, 2022
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, we'll explore the question:

As investors, how often should we check stock prices?

To answer this, we'll draw on key ideas and concepts from many different fields -- probability, information theory, psychology, etc.
2/

Imagine we have a stock: ABC, Inc.

Every day that the market is open, our stock either:

- Goes UP 1%, or
- Goes DOWN 1%.

For simplicity, let's say these are the only 2 possible outcomes on any given trading day.
3/

Suppose we think ABC is a "good" investment.

That is, the company has a wide moat, good returns on capital, decent growth prospects, etc. And the stock trades at a reasonable price.

So, we buy the stock -- expecting to make a very good return on it. Say, ~15% per year.
Read 40 tweets
Oct 23, 2022
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through 2 key portfolio diversification principles:

(i) Minimizing correlations, and
(ii) Re-balancing intelligently.

You don't need Markowitz's portfolio theory or the Kelly Criterion to understand these concepts. Image
2/

Imagine we have a stock: ABC Inc. Ticker: $ABC.

The good thing about ABC is: in 4 out of 5 years (ie, with probability 80%), the stock goes UP 30%.

But the *rest* of the time -- ie, with probability 20%, or in 1 out of 5 years -- the stock goes DOWN 50%.
3/

We have no way to predict in advance which years will be good and which will be bad.

So, let's say we just buy and hold ABC stock for a long time -- like 25 years.

The question is: what return are we most likely to get from ABC over these 25 years?
Read 23 tweets
Sep 11, 2022
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through the P/E Ratio.

Why do some companies trade at 5x earnings and others trade at 50x earnings?

When I first started investing, this was hard for me to understand.

So, let me break it down for you.
2/

Imagine we have 2 companies, A and B.

Let's say both companies will earn $1 per share next year.

And both companies will also GROW their earnings at the SAME rate: 10% per year. Every year. Forever.
3/

Suppose A trades at a (forward) P/E Ratio of 10. So, each share of A costs $10.

And B trades at a P/E Ratio of 15. So, each share of B costs $15.

Which is the better long term investment: A or B?
Read 31 tweets
Sep 4, 2022
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through a fundamental business concept that may be counter-intuitive to some of you:

Just because a business has made $1 of PROFIT, it does NOT mean the business's owners have $1 of CASH to pocket.
2/

To understand why, let's start with how PROFIT is defined.

PROFIT = SALES - COSTS

That is, we take all sales (or revenues) the company made during a quarter or year.

We back out all costs incurred during this period.

That leaves us with profits.

Seems straightforward.
3/

Here's the problem:

The way a "lay person" understands words like SALES and COSTS is completely different from the way an *accountant* uses these same words.

These discrepancies can create enormous confusion.
Read 20 tweets
Aug 28, 2022
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through a framework that I call "Lindy vs Turkey".

This is a super-useful set of ideas for investors.

Time and again, these ideas have helped me think more clearly about the LONGEVITY of the companies in my portfolio.
2/

Imagine we're buying shares in a company -- ABC Inc.

ABC is a very simple company. It earns $1 per share every year. These earnings don't grow over time.

And ABC returns all its earnings back to its owners -- by issuing a $1/share dividend at the end of each year.
3/

Suppose we buy ABC shares for $5 a share.

That's a P/E ratio of 5.

We know we get back $1/year as a dividend.

So, for us to NOT lose money, ABC should survive AT LEAST 5 more years.

If something happens and ABC DIES before then, we'll likely lose money.
Read 32 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(