People think of *orphanages* when they think of orphans. This leads to the common belief that an orphan is someone with no parental-role relatives.
And commonly, orphans refer to such children.
However, @UNICEF uses a standard international definition, which I too prefer.
/2
There are many configurations of parenthood. In some cultures, it's the "nuclear family" (mom+dad+kids), in some cultures it's an extended family (including grandparents, for example), and within cultures there are variations (raised by aunt, grandma does the raising, etc)
/3
A *primary* caregiver is someone who has shared but crucial role in supervision, safety, security, and basic needs. A *secondary* caregiver is someone who is regularly tasked by the primary caregiver to fill caregiving roles.
/4
Of course, all of these people are crucial to the development, care, security, and emotional connection to children.
The loss of any of these people, from a regularly babysitting aunt to a full-time caregiving grandparent to a mother or father, is devastating to children.
/5
So using the @UNICEF definition, an orphan is someone who lost a primary caregiver.
Deaths due to COVID have created 1.1M such orphans, and that's before omicron or delta waves.
Realistically, this number is likely 2M as of today and not slowing down.
/6
The estimate of loss of secondary caregivers is about 1.6M such orphans (realistically 3M today).
All children who lose a primary or secondary caregiver experience significant suffering and harm.
/7
Survey after survey of kids tells us that their top concerns, distresses, or challenges are the fear of a loss of a loved one, teacher, caregiver, or parent. And they are worried about the adults' in their lives health. They too, understand they are relatively protected.
/8
But they know what we all know, if they lose a caregiver and experience orphanhood, it is a pain and stress that will change their lives forever.
so please, keep the awful, repugnant phrase "covid isn't that bad for kids" out of your brain.
/fin
(all images are stock photos to the best of my knowledge, and i licensed 3 myself for these tweets as well as using free sites, i hopefully did not publicly use a child's expression of grief at a funeral)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Placebo-controlled trials compare a vaccine to an inactive substance (placebo). This helps measure how effective the vaccine is. In the case of vaccines, often, the placebo is not "saline", but rather a previous vaccine or vaccine solution.
/1
When a safe, effective vaccine already exists, using an inactive placebo means some participants are deliberately left unprotected against disease. This creates unnecessary harm.
/2
Ethical standards require minimizing harm and offering participants the best available care. When a proven vaccine exists, denying it to anyone—regardless of location—is unethical.
/3
In Canada during the Delta wave, vaccination prevented infection (unvaccinated 6x higher chance of being infected). As well, being unvaccinated led to a 22X chance of being hospitalized and an 18X chance of dying.
/1
For confirmed infections, the IFR for unvaccinated was a whopping 2.4%. The IFR for being vaccinated was much lower, both due to preventing infection and reducing the consequences of it.
Delta was a very deadly strain, and unvaccinated people died/suffered the most.
/2
When Omicron hit, it was a strain that evaded vaccinations, leading to enormous numbers of infections, even in vaccinated people.
However, the immunity protection vs hospitalization and death was still enormous, and unvaccinated Canadians were 12X more likely to die.
Correcting revisionist history:
"COVID is not a problem for young people in the US"
Covid responsible (not "with", underlying cause) for 2% of all deaths <20. That's 1 out of every 50 deaths of all kids who die. #1 in infectious diseases, 5th in disease overall.
/1
COVID-19 deaths created 300,000 American orphans, 330,000 if we count "primary caregivers" and 380,000 if we count "secondary caregivers". That's a lot of childhood harm.
2x as common for Black kids
4x as common for Indigenous kids
1.6X as common for Hispanic kids
/2
Our most vulnerable children, with medical illnesses, suffered the most during the pandemic. Children with heart disease, respiratory disease, neurologic diseases, and chromosomal abnormalities suffered more severe symptoms than did children without those conditions.
Why do you use pronouns in your bio?
Because it's an easy way to promote inclusivity & to increase awareness of gender expression. It costs me nothing, &because I work with kids who are establishing their identity it shows that I don't make assumptions.
/1
Is being transgender a mental illness?
Being transgender is not a mental illness. It is a natural variation of human phenotype, though some transgender individuals may experience distress, called gender dysphoria, which is addressed through appropriate care.
/2
Can a man be a woman?
Yes. Some individuals identify as a gender different from their assigned sex at birth.
"What is a woman?"
A woman is a female by identity. This can refer to biological sex identity or social gender identity, depending on the context.
/3
🧵RFK Jr. is an antivax, AIDS-denying, absolutely antiscientific conspiracist.🧵
ANTIVAX:
“They get [vaccinated], that night they have a fever of 103, they go to sleep, and three months later their brain is gone... This is a Holocaust, what this is doing to our country.”
/1
ANTIVAX:
"I do believe that autism does come from vaccines"
Metaanalyses involving MILLIONS of children have confirmed there is no link. The lie started with another antivaxxer, disgraced fraudster Andrew Wakefield, who fabricated data.
/2
ANTIVAX:
"I've read all the science on autism and I can tell you, if you want to know... If it didn't come from the vaccines, then where did it come from?"
Autism primarily from combo of genetic factors & early brain development differences.
Battling Election Misinformation
Part 2: "The Mandate"
Contrary to media/republican pronouncements, the election of Donald Trump was one of the narrowest (by popular vote, +1.73%) in history, with only 7 elections since 1800 being narrower.
/1
In fact, if we look at the margin of victory when we include all eligible voters, Trump wins with 31.3% of the voting population, compared to Harris' 30.2% and 1% going to other candidates. 37.4% did not vote.
If we only include voters, Trump wins 50.03% to 49.97%
/2
When we look at the electoral college results, Trump won 58% of available electoral college votes. This would rank his election 41st out of 57 elections since 1800.