There’s a deeper history to “Chinese Alphabets” like this. Much of it orientalist, exoticizing, racist. But some is ad admixture of eccentrism + brilliance, spear-headed by Chinese inventors—esp. ones interested in Telegraphy, Computing, and Chinese I.T. more broadly. THREAD/1
The exoticizing/racializing story is a bit better known, but essential to spotlight again. One need go no further than the infamous “Chinese Restaurant Font” (not its real name, but how it came to be known). A wonderful write-up in @qz by @annequito /2 cnn.com/style/article/…
There's a lesser known part of this history. Let’s start w/ Telegraphy. Since 1871, Chinese Morse Code (the backbone of telegraphy) was based on translating Chinese characters into 4-digit ciphers. Why? Because you can’t fit the 70,000+ characters into Standard Morse.
A base-10 system, Arabic numerals are inefficient info storage. Some thought “Why not use Latin letters *as* codes? The Latin alphabet is a 'base-26' system!" If 4 digits can store 10,000 characters, you can store 17,000+ in just 3 letters (26^3).
But a problem! Circa 1880 or 1890, Chinese telegraphers weren’t familiar w/ Latin letters. The ABCs were foreign. The solution? A “Chinese Alphabet” where each Latin letter was represented by a Chinese character that approximated its sound. Look at the picture.
So A = 愛 B = 比 C = 西...! (keep in mind: although the original 4-digit Chinese telegraph code was invented by foreigners, this idea of using a "Chinese Alphabet" was developed by Chinese telegraphers)
Fast forward to the age of Computing! Here the problem facing Chinese was similar: how to “fit” Chinese, not in Morse Code, but on QWERTY keyboard.
1 solution 2 the “Chinese QWERTY problem” = what I call “Isomorphism” (or “same-shape-ism”). These were systems where Latin letters were paired with Chinese chars based on their *common shapes*! (Here’s where we come back to the picture that your kid brought home from school).
These "isomorphic" systems were invented by (brilliant and inventive) Chinese + Chinese-American inventors. One of these individuals was H.C. Tien, pictured on the far left.
Here are a few more examples from Tien's Chinese input system invented by H.C. Tien, where you can see a bunch of the pairings.
Notice how Tien linked "P" and 尸 just like on your son's sheet (!)
(Tien call it his “Chinese Transalphabet”)
Tien wasn’t alone, either. There are a # of other Chinese input systems from the late 80s/90s based on the same idea, pairing "o" and 口, D and 刀, etc. These were invented in the PRC by Chinese inventors, mind you, *not* individuals interested in lampooning Chinese script!
BTW, “isomorphism” shows up in every script. Like the practice of using the lowercase ‘x’ to represent the Hebrew aleph, of so-called “Homograph” attacks that using the Russian Cyrillic “H” (n) to “spoof” the Latin “H” (h), and then things like L33T Speak.
So, it’s true: images like the one from your child’s school are, 99x out a 100, results of ignorance/exoticization/persistent forms of structural racism. But there's also a fascinating “counter-history” tied to Chinese technological experimentation & cross-cultural exploration.
To conclude w/ a shameless plug, please check out my first book on all this stuff! amazon.com/Chinese-Typewr…
Don't take my work for it, though!
Ai Weiwei himself called it "a fascinating and extensive study into the characteristics of the Chinese language."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Symbolic centralization suggests that Beijing Time was a way for the government to symbolically centralize power. /9
Symbolic secession suggests that Beijing Time was a way for the PRC to differentiate itself from the rest of the world, by having its own unique time zone. Each approach leaves a number of questions unanswered. /10
While the origins of Beijing Time may be shrouded in mystery, but its impact on daily life in China is undeniable. /11
Despite spanning over 60 degrees of latitude, China has only 1 time zone, "Beijing Time" (UTC+8).
The unification of time in the PRC is a fascinating topic that has not been explored nearly enough in the literature. /THREAD
(Before beginning: Yes, I know about Urumqi Time in Xinjiang, the one exception, which is two hours behind (more on this shortly) /2
While scholars have explored the standardization of time in a Euro-American context, little attention has been paid to China's trajectory. China was not represented at any major events related to global time, & the origins of Beijing Time remain somewhat shrouded in mystery. /3
They "couldn't really tell the difference between whether I was Chinese or Japanese or Korean or if I even spoke English. They would talk very loudly and very slow."
A thread re: #MichelleYeoh & how 1 barometer of Anti-Asianism is the portrayal of Chinese-language technology /1
Before Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, Yeoh's early U.S. film debut was with the James Bond franchise. Yeoh later revealed how depleting/damaging the experience was for her.
What I recall, because of my work on Chinese IT history, was the strange cameo made by a Chinese computer, in which the presumed otherness/alterity/strangeness/absurdity of Chinese IT was on display /3
Just when I worried if "Where Research Begins" appeals to researchers outside the Humanities, a @UTAustin grad workshop quieted all concerns.
Chris and I just led a hybrid in-person/virtual seminar for 100+ registrants, hailing from... 59 DIFF DISCIPLINES
Here they are! /1
Here are the departments of the students who attended...
Accounting
Aerospace Engineering
Anthropology
Applied Learning and Development
Art Education
Art History
Asian Cultures and Languages
Biology
Biomedical Engineering
/2
Business Administration
Chemical Engineering
Chemistry
Civil Engineering
Communication Studies
Community and Regional Planning
Computational Science, Engineering and Mathematics
Computer Science
/3