I appreciate the response! And my response here is: If you write a story about a theory, you have a responsibility to grapple with the substance of the theory.

Imagine writing a puff piece about Alex Berenson and his bold struggle to convince the world that vaccines don't work.
No, I don't expect economics reporters to deeply understand these theories. But if you're writing about a theory, good reporting requires getting information about the theory from someone other than its leading proponent!
Just as you wouldn't take your info about antivaxers' theories directly from Alex Berenson if you were writing about antivaxers, you should call up some macroeconomists and ask them about MMT when writing a big feature story on MMT. It is simply the required due diligence.
I simply think it's journalistically inappropriate to write a narrative piece about the hero's journey of the leading proponent of a theory without addressing - or even learning much about - the theoretical debate! I believe the New York Times should not do that.

(end)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Noah Smith 🌐+🧦=🐇

Noah Smith 🌐+🧦=🐇 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Noahpinion

Feb 9
1/Iconic symbols of the late 2010s and early 2020s: An ongoing thread.
2/Teslas. Image
3/

5over1 apartment buildings. Image
Read 39 tweets
Feb 8
So, the crisis is Putin's fault, and we must unequivocally support Ukraine's sovereignty, BUT we're also beating the drums of war?

OK Bern, whatevs.
"We must impose severe consequences" if Putin invades...But apparently threatening sanctions, which is now all that we're doing, is beating the war drums...So what severe consequences does Bernie want to threaten??
The entire leftist discourse on Ukraine appears to be premised on the mistaken belief that the U.S. has threatened to go to war over Ukraine, when in fact we have only threatened sanctions.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 6
People are upset about NFTs for one reason: A little bit of the stupendous wealth that had built up in crypto whales' wallets has now been dispersed to people who are more visible, and to whom the chattering classes can therefore compare themselves.
The total market cap of crypto is like $2 trillion. One hundred-thousandth of that is far more money than almost anyone will accumulate in a lifetime of hard-work - now being nabbed in an afternoon by some silly kids who drew pictures of apes!
As for me, I like NFTs because they made money for one nice person I kinda-sorta know in Japan 😊
Read 5 tweets
Feb 4
I've unpaywalled my post "Wokeness as old-time American religion" -- the second in my series of posts about wokeness.

In this one, I argue that wokeness is actually an American ideology that has existed for centuries and reemerges again and again.

noahpinion.substack.com/p/wokeness-as-…
In the first section of the post, I argue:

* Critical race theory is part of wokeness, but is not central to the movement, which is grassroots in nature

* The key thinkers are Black American writers, not the Frankfurt School or any European leftists
In the second section, I argue (as have many others) that wokeness has Protestant Christian roots, and that Congregationalist abolitionism was the original version of wokeness.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 4
The Biden Boom rolls on, powering right through Omicron
Time to go back and find all those tweets from a month ago predicting imminent economic collapse, and screenshot them wryly 😃
YOU JUST CAN'T KEEP THIS ECONOMY DOWN
Read 4 tweets
Feb 3
The debate over Covid NPIs is mystifying to me at this point. I was a huge supporter of NPIs in 2020. I made a website about them. And yet now it's clear that NPIs just cannot contain Omicron. And we have effective vaccines. So what is the debate about, exactly?
Is it just a thing where we got used to shouting for NPIs for so long that people are just stuck in that mode, kind of like people are still stuck bathing in hand sanitizer years after it became clear that surfaces weren't a significant vector of transmission?
Or is it a thing where people are using calls for NPIs as a way to vent their frustration at the people whose resistance to NPIs hurt our pandem control efforts back in 2020?

Or maybe to just vent their incohate rage at the whole pandemic?
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(