I often wonder what heights Dembele could’ve reached if he played predominantly higher up the pitch (in his peak years). The ability to beat defenders and open room for low pin-point shots, off both feet, is such a threat.
This isn’t to say he didn’t reach a level close to his ceiling.
Given the landscape of Spurs’ squad from 2013-2019, a deeper role made more sense anyway - and despite being harder to quantify, I actually think Dembele could well have added more value from his deeper role anyway.
His core attributes to me, were:
- his ability to receive with high retention
- his awareness to receive on the half turn when given space to turn into, or roll his defender in either direction if pressured upon receiving
Both of which allowed him to get rhythm in central areas.
This “rhythm” or, for want of a better phrase, momentum, allowed him to make those progressive carries in tight areas, and the ability to do this so consistently is so, so rare. The consistency and efficacy combined is truly unique.
It is also worth noting the downstream effects of Dembele being such a deep threat not only created space for Eriksen, etc further up the pitch, by drawing players into him, but also allowed Spurs to open the wings/HSs as opposition teams compressed into a more narrow shape.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
📌 325/235: The Best Formation in Football? [Thread]
Most of the top teams utilise a variant of the 325/235 formation in possession. This thread will explore why teams use the 235/235 formation, and why it is optimal in the fast-paced, hyper-technical/physical modern game - where the margins are fine.
Simply broken down, the 235/325 is ideal in possession, because the team has occupation of all five lateral zones, which is conducive of good spacing and balance, while maintaining overloads and security in deep central areas.
Southampton look very potent exploiting the wide space surrounding Spurs’ compact block. The key would be getting the spare fullback to receive with an open crossing lane on their second touch. This is done by creating a wide three (near side) or a quick switch (far side).
Crucially, they’re showing no fear in build-up despite Spurs pushing high with a view to pressing. This allows Southampton to attack while the pitch is stretched, rather than exclusively when Spurs are in a comfortable block. Broja’s runs into depth are crucial in this regard.
Perhaps more crucially, Southampton aren’t forcing the issue prematurely. They aren’t just seeing the availability of players high/wide as a primary option, but rather with a view to get them to receive as a third man/with an advantageous/exploitable scenario.
📌 Pep Guardiola’s Manchester City [Tactical Thread]:
How the Clarity of Player Roles Renders a Seemingly Complex Tactical Setup Simple and Efficient
As I presented back in October, City like to build in the 2-3 structure, progressing in an in to out manner. Whether this is by design, or because opposition prioritise defending central areas, ushering City out wide, City often created the staggered possession funnel.
The perfect example of this funnel was against Norwich, where Bernardo Silva (the #8) made an off the ball movement opening the lane for Walker to make the vertical pass through to Jesus. City progressed and created in this manner for much of the early season.
📌 Manchester United's Foundations in Possession: West Ham vs Man Utd [THREAD]:
- Varane carrying centrally
- McTominay dropping in right half space
- Fred semi-dropping
- Midfield/Forward line rotations to receive
- United access between the lines consistently early on
United’s nominal formation is presented below:
1) Varane’s in build up:
When Varane had no vertical passing option, he often shuttled diagonally towards the centre of the pitch. This gave time for United’s Mid/Forwards to rotate and create an option, plus Varane’s carries prevented him from stagnating United’s possession.
- Why do teams use it?
- How to differentiate between modes of counterpressing
- Why counterpressing is pre-emptive, not reactive
A counterpress is a coordinated action to prevent a defensive transition – ie a scenario where your team is being counterattacked as you try to regain shape. Simply put – your team seeks to regain possession via a press in a timely manner.
A counterpress can be used defensively - to prevent a counterattack, or offensively - to retain possession, thus retaining territory or pressure, or to create a simulated state of disorder upon which you can capitalise.
Ultimately, you're preventing a defensive transition.