Zoe Tillman Profile picture
Feb 8 17 tweets 9 min read
The first Jan. 6 trial is set for Feb. 28 — Guy Reffitt of Texas is accused of bringing a gun to the Capitol, and making it up steps outside before police turned him back.

Late last night, the govt filed more details about the case it'll put to the jury: s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2119…
Before diving in to last night's doc, a refresher on Reffitt's case and how his trial has taken shape: buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…
Prosecutors say they expect to call 13 witnesses:
- Four US Capitol Police witnesses, three of whom will testify they interacted w/ Reffitt. The govt has alleged that initial rounds of pepperballs, projectiles, and chemical spray didn't deter him from trying to get to the Capitol
- Four FBI witnesses, who will discuss physical/electronic evidence collected in the investigation, as well as one the judge agreed to approve as a lay witness to talk about a holster found in Reffitt's bedroom + images of what govt alleges is a holster on his hip at the Capitol
- One Secret Service witness, who will testify about how they handled security for then-VP Pence and his family. A key element of one of the charges against Reffitt is the presence of Secret Service protectees in restricted building/grounds he's accused of illegally entering
- One former Senate staffer who was there on Jan. 6 and will testify about what was happening that day re: certifying the Electoral College vote during the special joint session
- Reffitt's son, who will testify about what he knew about Reffitt's activities in DC, recordings he made post-Jan. 6, and threats he says Reffitt made
- Reffitt's daughter, who will testify about intimidating statements
- member of Texas Three Percenters granted immunity
The filing lists the government's exhibits, featuring physical items (incl. the handgun and the rifle the govt contends Reffitt traveled to DC with, they allege he had the handgun with him at the Capitol), photos, videos, and messages/info pulled from electronic devices
The filing also includes four stipulations, which means the govt and Reffitt agreed on certain facts to present to the jury, incl. info about the Capitol complex, authenticity of surveillance videos, basic timeline of Congress' activities/evacuation on Jan. 6, and DC curfew
The last page is a sample of the verdict form. Here's the indictment for a full description of the five charges he's going to trial on: s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2106…
Reffitt is one of a small but notable group of defendants who have tried — unsuccessfully, so far — to challenge the application of the felony "obstructing an official proceeding" to Jan. 6. More on that: buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…

Next pretrial conference is set for Feb. 18
Reffitt's case features certain elements that are common across the Jan. 6 prosecutions, making his trial an important first test for the govt — obstructing an official proceeding, civil disorder, entering/remaining in a restricted building/grounds are in hundreds of cases
*But* Reffitt's case is unusual in some respects — there are a handful of cases involving firearms, although many more involving weapons allegations generally; there's no allegation he went inside; relatively few defs face a charge of obstructing the investigation via threats
Addendum, for those wondering how Safeway fits into all this — as @ryanjreilly alludes to here, in order to prove the civil disorder charge, the govt has to prove Reffitt interfered w/ police during a civil disorder that "adversely affected commerce"
@ryanjreilly Not included in the elements of the offense is whether the events of Jan. 6 affected the extent to which Safeways in DC were social, secret, sexy, senior, or soviet
Update: Jan. 6 defendant Guy Reffitt, set for trial this month, objects to the govt's intent to present a former Senate counsel to "generally explain the process and constitutional and legal bases for Congress’s certification of the Electoral College vote" s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2120…
Reffitt's lawyer argues the govt is trying to introduce expert testimony under the guise of lay testimony (expert witnesses have to go through a specific qualification process), and that, regardless, an expert witness can't opine on "ultimate issues of law"

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Zoe Tillman

Zoe Tillman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ZoeTillman

Feb 8
Jan. 6 defendant Greg Rubenacker filed notice that plea negotiations with the govt fell through, and he intends to plead guilty to the full *10-count* indictment against him, which includes three felony charges s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2119…
Rubenacker's lawyer explains to the judge that the sticking points were:
1) not wanting to give up the right to contest the govt's calculation of his sentencing guidelines range
2) contending the govt should drop the obstruction count because they did so in another case
For more on why the obstruction charge is a big deal in the Jan. 6 cases and how judges so far are rebuffing legal challenges to its use:
buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…
Read 5 tweets
Feb 7
Hello from Judge Rudolph Contreras' virtual courtroom, where Jan. 6 defendant Nicole Prado is appearing for sentencing. Govt wants 14 days, highlighting evidence of her awareness of mob activity around her, how far she made it into the Capitol; she's seeking probation
Govt acknowledges in a footnote that Contreras has previously said he's not inclined to order jail for nonviolent Jan. 6 defendants during the pandemic, but they're still going to argue for it because they think it's warranted
AUSA is making the govt's standard argument for why misdemeanor cases like Prado's are so serious, telling the judge that the entirety of the mob gave cover to the people who committed violence and destroyed property
Read 6 tweets
Feb 4
Another Jan. 6 defendant, Dustin Thompson, notifies the judge that he may argue as a defense at trial that he believed he had official permission from Trump — "he was acting under actual or believed public authority." Trial is set for April 11. Image
During pretrial detention fights last year, judges rejected the theory that a president could authorize something like the Capitol attack. Thompson's lawyer prev. filed notice in court that they planned to subpoena as witnesses Trump "and several members of his inner circle" Image
The issue of whether Jan. 6 defendants can use the Trump defense at trial has come up in a few other cases so far -->
Read 5 tweets
Feb 4
Judges have repeatedly rejected legal challenges to one of the most common felonies charged in hundreds of pending Jan. 6 cases. It's a significant string of recent wins for DOJ as the investigation grinds on into its second year.
buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…
Charging people with "obstructing an official proceeding," a felony, has been a key tool for DOJ to draw a line around the Jan. 6 cases they consider more serious — often it's paired with other felonies like assault or conspiracy, but not always buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…
High-profile Jan. 6 defendants + wave of misdemeanor pleas + conspiracy indictments captured public attention in the first year, but there are hundreds of felony cases pending, and the fate of legal challenges to the obstruction count has loomed over those buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…
Read 4 tweets
Feb 3
New: Judges in recent weeks have repeatedly rejected legal challenges to one of the most common felonies charged in hundreds of pending Jan. 6 cases. It's a significant string of wins for DOJ as the investigation grinds on into its second year.
buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…
Conspiracy indictments + early wave of misdemeanor pleas got a lot of attention (for good reason), but there are hundreds of felony Jan. 6 cases, and the fate of challenges to the "obstructing an official proceeding" charge has been a looming question mark buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…
In a string of rulings since December, judges handling these cases (of varying ideological backgrounds) have all reached the same conclusion, which is that prosecutors can go ahead with the felony obstruction charge in connection with Jan. 6 buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…
Read 6 tweets
Feb 2
Hello from Judge Amit Mehta's virtual courtroom, where a status conference is getting started in the non-sedition Oath Keepers conspiracy case (Crowl et al.).

Info to listen in + court rules:
Toll Free Number: 877-848-7030
Access Code: 3218747
dcd.uscourts.gov/covid-19-emerg…
Meanwhile, in other Oath Keepers-related developments:
Purpose of the hearing is to talk that as of now is set for April. Mehta says the jury office is not recommending sending out a questionnaire with jury summonses, says they've had a lot of problems with that system, rec'ing summoning ppl to come in first to fill it out
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(