This is nuts. Even for Banks. Eldon Insurance & LeaveEU brought this appeal against the Information Commissioner. Then didn’t show up.
Also: curious dates. My libel trial ended Jan 21. 5 days later Banks’s solicitors @kingsleynapley ‘came off record’
Mr Jacobus Coetzee, the named director of LeaveEU who failed to show up to court, is an old associate of Arron Banks. On this exciting page of ‘Bad Boys of Brexit’ featuring all the greats inc Andrew Neil & the Russian ambassador, he describes him as a ‘South African spook’.
A refresher: this was the appeal Arron Banks previously lost. In the judgement, the judge noted - that the man suing me for saying he had lied - was ‘untruthful’ & had been ‘bullying’ toward the Information Commissioner
During parliamentary debate brought by @liambyrnemp & @DavidDavisMP during my trial, it was revealed MI5 had contacted the Information Commissioner - Liz Denham - to tell her it had evidence Banks’s private intelligence firm was illegally surveilling her
And who’s a director of Arron Banks’s private intelligence firm, Precision Risks & Intelligence? Why it’s only Mr Jacobus Coetzee. The ex-South African spook who seems to have had a change of mind about turning up to the High Court
And here’s the kicker. Who else was a director of Precision Risks & Intelligence? One Frank Mermoud. A Ukrainian gas specialist all over the Senate Intelligence Report. Enjoy this extract featuring Paul Manafort & a Russian spy, Konstantin Kliminik, discussing ‘the Frank plan’
Important to remember in interests of fairness & balance, that I’m a ‘crazy conspiracist’ who has caused ‘serious harm’ to Mr Banks’s reputation
Note: we still don’t know results of data audit, ICO was undertaking of Eldon & LeaveEU. Also Jacobus Coetzee, the SA spook - who had what to do with Brexit? - really got left holding the baby. He ended up as last remaining director when Banks resigned in Aug last year.
Final postscript. A bit more detail from the doc. In the days after my trial ended, @kingsleynapley ‘sought to come off the record as a matter of urgency in the days leading up to the hearing’. No clues as to why…🤷♀️
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Distracted by the slaughter of children in Iran & Lebanon? Me too! But what better time could there be for govt to quietly relaunch its Digital ID plan?
Missed it? Me too! But look who’s celebrating…
The director of ‘govt innovation’ at the Tony Blair Institute! 1/
The govt noisily scrapped Digital ID after huge pushback when nobody bought its ‘it’ll solve immigration’ bollocks. But as markets tanked last week - kudos to the comms team! - it was discreetly re-launched with all-new messaging: a ‘common sense solution to everyday probs’
2/
Darren Jones, Cabinet Office secretary, put out a press release claiming the govt will be holding a ‘consultation’.
NOT: ‘Do you want the govt & unknown tech companies to have all your data?’
BUT: (I kid you not): ‘At what age should you be able to get a digital id?’ 🤔 3/
Congrats to all the news orgs that signed syndication deals with this company. You’ve licensed your journalism to be a core component of Trump’s illegal war machine. Great job everyone 👏
A special shoutout to the editor-in-chief & CEO of the Guardian, Kath Viner & Anna Bateson. The deal with OpenAI was an unforced error which legitimised OpenAI’s illegal scraping of Guardian data & IP. In exchange for a quick buck. The NYTimes, in contrast, chose to sue.
Anthropic stood up to Trump. But OpenAI has capitulated. And now all its ‘partners’ are complicit in the consequences.
That includes Guardian. It will financially benefit from its journalists’ work - inc mine - being used to support Trump’s illegal wars & ICE’s reign of terror.
PREDICTION: If Andrew is charged (no assumption of guilt etc), we are going to have a crisis of both the press & judiciary.
In Britain, it is an offence to publish ANY info on defendant beyond bare facts.
But! US outlets can print whatever they like…
1/
Contempt of court is foundational principle of British justice: press must not prejudice a jury trial.
Editors risk a prison sentence if found in breach.
Even in digital age, the law held…but how could it possibly withstand deluge of US coverage in a case like this??
3/
Short answer: it won’t. Far right agitator Tommy Robinson weaponised UK laws on contempt as a ‘cover up’ over grooming scandal. And the New Yorker ignored & published on Lucy Letby.
If Andrew is charged, it’ll trigger a crisis for both the press & judiciary
4/
NEW: Our investigation for @thenerve_news reveals not only that Peter Thiel’s Palantir is completely enmeshed in our critical national infrastructure.
It’s also the ‘cloud support’ for our nuclear weapons system 1/
Palantir’s stated mission is to defend America. Peter Thiel is a radical libertarian who does not believe ‘freedom & democracy are compatible’.
Yet, the UK is overwhelmingly dependent on Palantir’s services. As a national security threat, this is off the charts. 2/
Please read the piece with comments from tech & national security experts.
We have no national security while we rely on highly political US Silicon Valley firms that are enmeshed in Trump’s increasing fascistic administration. 3/
Ignore the political pundits. They’ve failed us. The media is failing us. Listen to the historians. This is Conservative historian Robert Kagan on what is happening in Minneapolis & what it means. 3/
The barrister for the Crown has laid out the background and context for the case, including Ukraine's efforts to join the European Union.
2/
The barrister confirms that Gill was en route to Moscow when he was stopped at Manchester airport in 2021 (as first reported in @thenerve_news. 3/ thenerve.news/p/nathan-gill-…