Over in the Senate floor, they're working through amendments on Senate Bill 9. It's Senate President Peter Micciche's long-delayed alcohol law rewrite.
Amendment 1 was by Sen. Kiehl. It would've loosened the strict population limits the bill would place on tasting rooms (effectively closing many markets to any new entrants) but he says in the interest of trying to get this bill—which was first introduced in 2015—he withdraws it.
And now a little at ease, as a treat.
After the long at-ease, Senate President Micciche notes that there's objection to withdrawing Sen. Kiehl's amendment. Sen. Begich says he supports withdrawing it, but supports the amendment, too.
Sen. Donny Olson is making the motion against withdrawing it.
Sen. Costello: "once an amendment is offered on the body it now belongs to the body."
Sen. Olson says he offered a similar amendment in the Senate Finance Committee but withdrew it there because he was told he'd have an opportunity to vote on it on the floor.
It's withdrawn on a 10Y-8N vote.
That's it for amendments.
Sen. Stevens leads off debate on the bill, carrying it for Senate President Micciche.
As said earlier, Micciche has been attempting to get this bill done since 2015.
Stevens says that it's an effort to bring together differing, competing interests like liquor industry, bars and substance abuse groups.
He says everyone's currently on board (which is why they can't risk any amendments on the floor or else CHARR will spike it again)
Sen. Costello asks about the bill's extended tasting room hours, which would move from 8 p.m. to 10 p.m. She wonders if it's really a hard close or whether it's more flexible.
Here's the language, which says "may not enter a premises" between 10 p.m. and 9 a.m.
Brief at-ease.
A layman's reading does seem to have some wiggle room. You can't ENTER after 10 p.m. but if you're already there are you good?
And if you look at another section relating to tasting rooms, though, there's a hard cut off at 10 p.m. when it comes to serving. So, no, there's not some no secret loophole to keep the party going.
Stevens says it's a hard close.
Sen. Olson says he doesn't support the strict limits on tasting rooms: "Let's let the free market decide ... not some bureaucrat who has no experience where the rubber meets the road and certainly not politicians because politicians come and go."
Sen. Stevens says it's not a special interest bill: "Everyone gave and got something important to them" (like stricter limits on tasting rooms).
And Senate Bill 9 has passed the Senate on a 18-0 vote.
The House Military and Veterans' Affairs Committee is underway with its Oath Keepers Informational hearing. They're hosting the Anti-Defamation League's Center on Extremism and George Washington University's Program on Extremism.
Not exactly the best-attended hearing so far. None of the Republicans—who've so far voted in defense of Rep. David Eastman, a member of the Oath Keepers—are present currently.
First up is Alex Friedfeld, an investigative
researcher from the Anti-Defamation League's Center on Extremism.
He's going over the Oath Keepers' involvement in Jan. 6 and is explaining the deep state conspiracies fueling the militia movement, noting that anti-vax is a key part.
Some after-the-credits action in the House, Rep. Hopkins moves that the Sense of the House be adopted. There's a flurry of objections from Republicans so a pretty good guess about what it's about.
Rep. Kurka says it's "clearly engaging in personalities."
Followed by an at-ease.
Following the at-ease, House Speaker Stutes says his concerns are "duly noted" and refers the Sense of the House to the Military and Veterans Affairs Committee.
Which gets an objection from Eastman and another at-ease.
The 2022 Alaska State of the Judiciary is underway. Delivering his first State of the State is Chief Justice Daniel Winfree. He notes it may be his last given the age limits for the Alaska Supreme Court.
Winfree: I was one of the young ones 50 years ago criticizing the establishment and now I'm part of the establishment. I find myself wondering why we haven't made more progress.
Winfree is the first Alaska-born Supreme Court Chief Justice, has experienced all the political establishments and governors, the good and the bad.
The House floor is underway. Anchorage Mayor Dave Bronson was in the gallery. Also Reps. Eastman and Kurka introduced a move-the-capitol-to-Willow bill that got tagged with three committees of referral.
First on the legislation agenda is Rep. Zulkosky's HB198, establishing Sept. 10 as Alaska Community Health Aide Appreciation Day. As introduction, she's talking about the importance of health aides provide care throughout the state.
Rep. Zulkosky said in her opening comments that Sept. 10 was picked because it was the first planning and advisory committee meeting in 1973.
But first, the House Education Committee is holding a hearing with the free/reduced tuition for essential workers bill. It's set to gavel out for the House floor session at 10 and resume at 330.
SB10 by Sen. Tom Begich passed out of the Senate last year on a 12-7 vote. He starts off by noting that the bill needs to be updated since it was written for last year.
He says providing these opportunities could be "potentially life-changing" for frontline workers.
Begich: "It's clear that there's been a wildly uneven recovery."
He says this could give frontline workers a "hand up as the dust settles." Then talks about some of the earning power of higher education and technical training.
The trial over the Higher Education Investment Fund is underway. The case was brought by several University of Alaska students challenging Gov. Dunleavy's sweep of the fund set up by the #akleg to fund scholarships (and later WWAMI).
The main argument here, as I understand, is the original appropriation setting up the fund is still valid and therefore it's out of reach out of the constitutional budget reserve sweep.
Dunleavy argues it should be funded ad hoc each year, competing with other spending.
Former Attorney General Jahna Lindemuth is handling the oral arguments for the plaintiffs. She's outlining the legal argument that the funds have not lapsed.
She says it's the only one consistent with the plain language of the Alaska Constitution and precedent.