Two Hungarian bioinformatics experts noticed an odd thing in a genomic database. Soil samples taken on King George's Island, Antarctica in 2018 or 2019 by Chinese scientists included sequences from SARS-CoV-2. 1/7
In 3 of the samples there was enough to recover a 17x virus genome. It turns out to be a genome with three mutations that take it closer to the bat relatives, so may be an ancestral version of the virus. 2/7
Nobody is suggesting the virus was in Antarctica. The sequencing was done in Shanghai, by a firm called Sangon Biotech, which is frequently used by lots of labs in China including the Wuhan Institute of Virology. 3/7
So it's almost certainly a case of "barcode misassignment errors" during demultiplexing - a frequent contamination issue with this type of Illumina machine in sloppy sequencing labs. 4/7
The DNA was extracted in December 2019 and the sequencing was done soon after but the date is not certain: maybe in early 2020 by which time lots of virus samples were being tested. So maybe not very interesting after all. 5/7
But 3 things now suggest it might be interesting. First, the unique mutations hint at it being an ancestral variant. Second, when the Hungarians published the preprint, the data was taken off the database by the Chinese scientists who had deposited it, then later restored. 6/7
Third, the two Hungarians have now published a new preprint identifying other animal DNA in the same samples. These are not from seals or penguins, but from African green monkeys and Chinese hamsters. Both species are the source of commonly used laboratory cell lines. 7/7
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Scientists have always had their prejudices, ideological biases and blind spots, but almost by definition regarded those as bad things to be minimised.
The insistence on subjecting all of science to ideological tests means maximising prejudice instead.
My, how we all laughed when Alan Sokal hoaxed a social science journal into publishing a paper ‘liberally salted with nonsense’ that ‘flattered the editors’ ideological preconceptions’.
Little did we realise that verbose and vapid social deconstruction was coming for physics.
In a new book, The War on Science, edited by the astrophysicist Lawrence Krauss, 31 scientists and scholars lament the corruption of their field by left-wing ideological nonsense. Whereas once a book with this title would have raged at the conservative right pushing creationism and sexism in the teeth of truth, now it is exposing the woke left pushing identity ideology and intersectionality at the expense of reason. @LKrauss1 @RichardDawkins @sapinker @GadSaad
"We buried a miracle in paperwork. Since the 1970s building a new reactor has effectively been illegal in America. It required $30 billion and 15+ years in regulatory hell," writes Stephen Mcbride in @RationalOptSoc.
🧵
"I bring good news. On my recent travels through Austin and Detroit I met the world’s best nuclear entrepreneurs. This was the first time they’ve ever said the following to me (and they all agreed):"
“Regulation is finally becoming a solved problem.
One founder said his microreactor (a small nuclear reactor, or “SMR”) could be up and running next year."
"Let me place you inside a taxi travelling to Geneva airport on 12 February 2020. Inside the cab are two people. One is Dr Peter Daszak, the $400,000-a-year head of the EcoHealth Alliance, an organisation that boasted about funnelling millions of dollars to the Wuhan Institute of Virology to harvest wild bat viruses and do risky experiments on them.
He and his organisation would later be debarred from federal funding by the Biden administration for failing to divulge vital information about EcoHealth’s support for suspiciously risky gain-of-function experiments on close relatives of the virus that caused Covid.
The other is Dr (now Sir) Jeremy Farrar, the then head of the Wellcome Trust, the world’s largest charitable funder of scientific research, and now head of science at the World Health Organisation (WHO)...."
"In the taxi, Farrar wants the issue ‘put to bed’, even though he knows the last hope of finding evidence for a natural origin of the virus – the pangolin theory – has already fallen apart. That’s because the pangolin virus lacks the very addition that alarmed the scientists about Covid, a thing called a furin cleavage site."
"Five days after his taxi ride, Farrar would indeed help ‘put to bed’ the lab-leak theory by reading the draft paper (written at his suggestion, remember) and asking that the authors change the wording from ‘unlikely’ to ‘improbable’. He then promises to ‘push’ the paper towards a major journal, Nature Medicine, all while refusing to be listed as either an author or in the acknowledgements. That itself is a breach of scientific ethics."
Britain's net-zero-obsessed energy policy came unstuck this week in six different ways:
1. Donald (Drill Baby Drill) Trump tore up electric-vehicle mandates and turned decisively against wind power. America, China and India are all going to increase their emissions by much more than we can possibly save.
2. Chris Wright testified how the shale revolution has turned America into now the world’s biggest producer of both oil and gas, ahead of even Saudi Arabia and Russia. That could have been our boom too.
Five years ago today, five things happened in Wuhan. 🧵
1. Doctors at Wuhan Central Hospital, Dr Ai Fen and Dr Li Wenliang, blew the whistle on the growing number of SARS-related coronavirus infections. They put a warning out on WeChat.
Both were severely reprimanded. Dr Ai was told: “You disregard the results of Wuhan’s urban construction since the [World] Military Games; you are a sinner affecting Wuhan’s stability and unity; you are the culprit undermining the City of Wuhan’s forward development.”
Dr Li was forced to sign a humiliating confession of sharing “untruthful information”. He later died of the infection, which came to be called Covid.
After bad floods in 1957 the Spanish government built a string of dams in the hills to hold back water and diverted the Turia river away from Valencia. For more than six decades the system worked well. Why did it fail this year?
The Spanish government has been removing dams at a furious rate. Under a European Union programme to encourage the restoration of rivers to their wild state for the benefit of fish migration, in 2021 it got rid of 108 dams and weirs; in 2022, another 133.
Worse is the failure to build at Cheste, specifically designed to prevent flooding, to ‘regulate the flows coming from the upper basin of the Poyo and Pozalet ravines’. It was approved in 2001 as part of a National Hydrological Plan.