More failures of ambition by Tower Hamlets Council
Tower Hamlets Council for about 10 years now has used 585-593 Commercial Road as its car pound
Now intend to sell it to a private developer for housing
Not develop itself despite it having excellent transport connections
Why? 1/
Why sell an asset you own with a public transport access of PTAL of 6a (where 1 is worst and 6b best) making it one of the best-connected sites in TH (close to Limehouse DLR & c2c station)
The Mayor says he wants to deliver 2,046 new Council homes but then routinely misses 2/
opportunities to maximise development on land it owns
Examples
If he really did want to deliver more new Council housing then you develop land you own - surely?
3/
Many of the 2,046 homes 'new' homes are not newly built by the Council homes but purchases of old homes or those built by private developers (s106 housing that housing associations would normally buy)
But the Council is building some new homes itself
4/
but mainly small sites (under 50 homes per site)
I worry that too many small sites = loss of economies of scale = too expensive per unit
This is why Croydon failed
This site could deliver at least 120 new homes (I think this is a major understatement)
But Council thinks this 5/
would be too expensive to develop?
But if housing associations & private developers can do it (both delivering high levels of affordable housing) why not the Council?
The plan 10 years ago was to develop it for housing around 2016
Why did we not build new homes 5 years ago? 6/
This is a big site
Opportunities for new homes (nearby have 9 storey blocks), new parks/playgrounds, new retail space, new community space & still respect conservation areas next door
Can deliver the ground floor family size units desperately needed + key worker homes for NHS 7/
staff at the Royal London Hospital 5 minutes cycle ride, 13 minutes bus & walk or 19 minutes walk away
By contrast Barking & Dagenham Council to build 3,000 new homes in 4 years lbbd.gov.uk/sites/default/…
They have set up their own delivery organisation befirst.london
8/
So by contrast why is TH so unambitious (they have sold land before)
Do they need the cash? they have lots of it & are not spending it
Is the land contaminated? but that would affect the price
Have they no confidence in their ability to develop big projects? Blackwall Reach 9/
If I was elected as Mayor I would
-Look to maximise delivery of new homes on Council owned land - either through Council or housing association partnership - this will mean some increase in height (but not to CW levels)
-Not sell land unless part of a deal to unlock new land
10
for development by the Council
-Compulsory purchase of undeveloped land
-Maximise delivery of larger accommodation + key worker housing to support schools, NHS, Police, Fire Brigade etc with recruitment
-Ensure new Council homes & places 'beautiful'
11/
Forgot to add that a year ago the Council thought they could sell the site for £21.8 million
I cannot remember what the colours meant, maybe certainty of sale or value democracy.towerhamlets.gov.uk/documents/s181…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This @TheEconomist article is very strange, odd & not really based on much evidence
It also repeats various myths without evidence, misses the big issues, and therefore comes to the wrong conclusions
A 🧵on its inaccuracies
a. no mention of leasehold or commonhold at all ! 1/
b. it correctly says these buildings are expensive which is true but then talks about land value in England as one main reason why tall towers in big cities are expensive
Economist article in black, my comments in red
The main reason why tall towers are expensive is 2/
because construction is v expensive
As evidence this agreement that Westferry Printworks could only deliver 21% affordable housing on a big site agreed by the developer, Tower Hamlets Council & the GLA
Construction costs £630 m
v
Land value £28m
v
Taxes (CIL & s106) = £49 m 3/
The issues are more extensive than @PlanningMag article states
Councillors who made the decision to reject the resident's Yes vote in favour of the business No vote
Incorrectly, used the wrong business turnout % to suggest a higher proportion of businesses voted than residents 1/
Proportionally more residents voted than businesses
Councillors were also not officially told that:
Some of the business votes were illegal (three people voted more than twice)
49.5% of all the business vote came from a single office building
Cllrs also not told that there was
2/
an active Police investigation underway
"amid suspicions of a “possible conspiracy to subvert the referendum”, allegation of multiple voting, and claims that some business owners had exerted “undue influence” to sway the vote against the council’s plan" standard.co.uk/news/london/po…
3/
Problems with Homes of Multiple Occupation (HMO) & why a man died due to Council inaction
A man died earlier this month in a flat fire, had the Council been more proactive and responsive he might still be alive but an attempt to get them to do so in January 2021 was rejected 1/
18 people, primarily students and delivery couriers from Bangladesh, lived in a 2-bedroom former Council flat at the time of the fire, 22 beds were seen in the property including in the kitchen (mainly bunk beds)
2/
The owner had bought the leasehold flat in 2005 but the freeholder was Tower Hamlets Council and the managing agent Tower Hamlets Homes, their arm's length management agency
Neighbours made complaints about number of people & leaks from the bathroom in late 2021 and 2022
3/
New independent private primary school in Canary Wharf planning application
CW Group has applied to build a new 9-storey (thin but tall) nursery and primary school in the middle of Wood Wharf
402 pupils (150 nursery pupils and 252 primary school pupils) and 80 FTE staff 1/
Summary here constructing-london.com/wood-wharf-sch…
This would be a fee-paying school separate from the Mulberry Primary state school already built opposite this proposed new school so there would be 2 schools on site
2/
It will be run by inspiredlearninggroup.co.uk/about-us/about… and would be the 3rd private school in the area including River House & Faraday
I assume CW Group are behind the idea of building a new private school as will generate a long run income and be popular with some of their new residents
3/
Local Plan consultation response - why the Local Plan needs to change
1st round of consultations on the new Local Plan ended on Wednesday - 2nd round of consultation should be later this year after they publish the draft policies
I wrote a 13 page response to it raising some 1/
of some of my issues with it & planning here in general
Fundamentally the objective of recent London and Local Plans has been to push most development in Tower Hamlets to Aldgate, Aberfeldy, Isle of Dogs including Blackwall & other parts of Poplar 2/
Development in most of the rest of Tower Hamlets is discouraged even when they have better transport links and better infrastructure than the growth areas listed above 3/
I went to the @ConHome Defence & Security Conference today
Several questions from audience about what will happen in Ukraine
All those who answered said, they don't know the outcome
That assumes Britain has a passive role
Britain could determine the outcome by helping Ukraine 1/
More western weapons would put Ukraine in a stronger position to win
(in the same way western support helped USSR defeat Nazi Germany) @BWallaceMP mentioned 250 vehicles sent by Britain
But Ukrainians crowdfunded to buy 101 ex-British Army armoured
vehicles themselves
(Ukrainians in UK find this harder to do as UK donation websites won't allow similar campaigns in the UK to buy 'weapons')
That we had 101 retired armoured vehicles incl. ambulances ready to go but were on the open market for sale suggests Britain not as
3/