Liam Spender Profile picture
Feb 9 8 tweets 2 min read
1/8 #buildingsafetybill More amendments were tabled last night, here: bills.parliament.uk/publications/4…

The running list is here: bills.parliament.uk/publications/4…
2/8 As with all amendments, they may or may not become part of the final Act of Parliament.

We watch the amendments to see what ideas are being proposed and how the government reacts to them.
3/8 There are 6 new amendments in 3 groups, a group of 2 amendments, a single amendment and a group of 4 amendments.

The first group would expand future Building Regulations to include "furthering the protection of property".

This aims to raise future fire safety standards.
4/8 The standalone amendment seeks to improve the energy efficiency of properties to at least an EPC Rating of "C" by 2035.

Properties posing a health risk are to meet the new standard by 2030.

The amendment proposes exemptions, including where works would cost more than £20k.
5/8 The standalone amendment reflects what has been said about current government policy of lifting the housing stock to an average EPC "C" rating.

This supposed to be achieved for all new private rented housing by 2025.

The costs of this are high and it is controversial.
6/8 Better energy efficiency also requires, at least in some cases, more insulation.

If Grenfell has shown us one thing it is that the product safety regime for insultation and cladding has failed woefully.

That must be fixed before imposing new mandates.
7/8 The final group of two amendments are aimed at requiring all leasehold properties to have an up-to-date Electrical Installation Condition Report.

A worthy idea, but given the enormous costs coming leaseholders' way with Part 4 of the Bill, it may be an expense too far.
8/8 These are opposition amendments, so unlikely to pass, unless the government takes up the ideas.

The next stage of the bill is Grand Committee, which begins on 21 February.

We expect further amendments before then, including the government's leaseholder protection proposal.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Liam Spender

Liam Spender Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LiamSpender

Feb 9
1/5 #leaseholdreform took a step forward yesterday afternoon.

The Leasehold Reform (Ground Rents) Act 2022 received Royal Assent (hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2022-02-…)

The Act bans monetary ground rents for new residential properties.
2/5 Ground rents have become an increasing scandal in recent years, with some finding they are trapped in unmortgageable properties.

Ground rents also entrench a system in which third party investors take control of a block of flats for a fraction of the price of one flat.
3/5 As the fire safety scandal has shown, those third party investor freeholders add nothing to residential property management.

They see residential leaseholders only as cash cows to provide an endless stream of income for them.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 7
1/9 #buildingsafetybill

Further amendments have been tabled today, which you can read here: bills.parliament.uk/publications/4…

As with all amendments, they may or may not be adopted as part of the final Building Safety Act.

We still watch the amendments to see where the Bill may go.
2/9 In addition to last week's amendment suggesting that the government consult on all new buildings having staircases that meet BS-5395-1, there are 2 further amendments, one from Lord Young of Cookham and one from Lord Blencathra.
3/9 Both Lords Young and Blencathra are Conservative peers.

It is harder for the government to argue against members of its own party than with Opposition peers.

As explained below, the nature of these amendments also puts pressure on the government to improve the Bill.
Read 9 tweets
Jan 19
1/15 #BuildingSafetyBill with everything else going on today, I expect this will fall down the headlines.

Starting at roughly 2 p.m. this afternoon the Commons will conduct the Report and Third Reading stages of the Bill.
2/15 Unfortunately due to work commitments this afternoon, I won't be able to live tweet the proceedings.

Here is a thread with some details on what is happening today.
3/15 Report and Third Reading are the final stages of Commons consideration.

After today, the Bill will move on to the House of Lords where it will go through its stages there (First Reading, Second Reading, Committee, Report and Third Reading).
Read 15 tweets
Jan 10
1/17 Hello Lucy,

For what they are worth, my views on today's announcement are below.

The headline is that this is a welcome step in the right direction, but we must see the detail on delivery to be sure it will solve all cladding and non-cladding issues.
2/17 The positive development is that the focus is now squarely on building developers and material manufacturers to produce money to remediate cladding and non-cladding defects on buildings 11-18 metres tall.

Developers are being told to pay to fix all their buildings 11m+
3/17 This shift of focus, including a commitment that the government will prioritise building safety over the supply of new houses, is a big change in policy.

Previously the debate was framed in terms of taxpayer v. leaseholder.

Now it is state v. construction industry.
Read 17 tweets
Jan 8
1/7 "The largest housebuilders have spent or committed approaching £1 billion" should be taken with a pinch of salt.

Many of them have made accounting provisions. That is not the same as agreeing to pay costs, or actually paying costs.
2/7 The £1 billion figure above also may not be strictly related to cladding costs. For example, a large part of Barratt's provision appears to relate to defective concrete frames, legal costs and the costs of buying back flats.
3/7 According to Note 3.6 to Barratt's 2021 financial statements, of its total provision of £67.6 million for building safety issues, £26 million (38%) still relates to Citiscape (defective frame).

It is unclear if that £26 million is included in the £1 billion number above.
Read 7 tweets
Nov 23, 2021
1/14 FirstPort (or should that be LastPort?) making Bernie Madoff look small time. Again.

dailymail.co.uk/property/artic…

I personally stand to pay £1,358.50, which is an inflated figure to pay FirstPort's fees and because its a crap negotiator.
2/14 So far, in exchange for their £34,000-odd fee they have:

1/ Copied and pasted a specification of works prepared by a contractor.

The copy and paste job is so bad that they have copied into the document "(C) SCCI AlphaTrack Page 5"
3/14

2/ They then did not upload the specification of works to the FirstPort MyHome website, as twice promised. It took about 2 weeks to get it out of them.

3/ The Major Works team hasn't conducted a tender. They're recycling quotes obtained by the onsite staff
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(