Gabriel Malor Profile picture
Feb 9 19 tweets 5 min read
For folks wondering what the Florida "don't say gay" law controversy is about, I have screengrabbed the two operative provisions.

They have the potential to create many problems for school districts, and—on their face—encourage anti-gay discrimination.
flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2…
First, the prohibition section: school districts may not encourage classroom discussion about sexual orientation in primary grade levels OR (in any grade level) in a manner that is not age-appropriate.
Problem: there are no definitions for what "encourage classroom discussion" means or what is "age-appropriate" in older grades.

This is a big problem if you're a school district trying to comply, but not run afoul of the First Amendment rights of LGBT students and teachers.
I'll give you an example from several years ago. A school encouraged teachers early in the school year to do a "Get To Know Your Teacher" presentation. Poster-board and photos, stuff about the teacher.

An art teacher included a photo of herself with her fiancée. She got fired.
The problem: she revealed to her students that she was gay and getting married.

(She later sued for her job and back pay, and won.)

With this law in place the school district could be sued for encouraging such a "Meet Your Teacher" presentation in grade school.
Second, the enforcement mechanism is a cause of action by parents to get state judges to find the school district procedure or practice violates the law.
Several more problems: (1) presumably the drafters mean paragraph 3, not "this paragraph"; (2) either way, we're back to the lack of definitions—there's no guidance for judges to make the determination, it's just up in the air;
More problems: (3) mandatory award of attorneys fees means this is a trial lawyer's dream—it means lots and lots of lawsuits against school districts;
And finally (4) it does not do what its proponents say it does.

The defense of this bill is conspicuously out of line with the actual text of bill. For example, Ben Shapiro says this is about preventing indoctrination from the Left.
But the bill is about whether there can be classroom discussion about sexual orientation, which is not a right or left issue at all. This is pure discrimination against gay people, and these cowards can't even admit it.
Someone else I respect greatly complained that in her school district, grade school kids get taught about masturbation.

Guess what? This bill doesn't prevent that either. It says nothing about masturbation in sex ed.
It simply prevents the discussion of sexual orientation and authorizes parental lawsuits for the purpose of preventing their children from learning about the existence of gay people during grade school.
It is, by its own terms a "don't say gay" law. And anyone telling you otherwise is not being truthful with you.
You're telling me your ma has never mentioned she's married in class? No photo of hubs?

This is a great example of how when gay people mention their spouses, it's "wearing identity on their sleeve," but for straight people, that's just not about sexual orientation.
Yes, the most generous interpretation could do that—after all "straight" is a sexual orientation—but, again, the law leaves its terms undefined, and we'll just have to wait and see how random judges are feeling when the lawsuits start.
To sum up, it's a bad law for reasons: (1) poorly defined; (2) trial lawyer bonanza; (3) wastes taxpayer money; and (4) encourages discrimination on its face.

But what really annoys me is how its defenders try to pretend it is something other than what it is. Just be honest.
And I hear the folks that say they want to reform sex education. They don't like the stuff the children are learning.

Okay. Have you considered a law that actually addresses that issue? Because this ain't that.
Here's the story of the teacher I talked about up-thread. BUT: she wasn't fired as I erroneously remembered.

She was placed on administrative leave after a parent complained that showing a photo of her fiancée was "promoting the homosexual agenda." cnn.com/2020/02/27/us/…
Didn't include when I discussed this bill yesterday, but the phrase "district procedure or practice" is going to get a LOT of scrutiny if this becomes law.

Districts are going to be under enormous pressure to have official "don't say gay" policies to avoid mandatory fee awards.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Gabriel Malor

Gabriel Malor Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gabrielmalor

Feb 8
11th Cir.: QI for officer who, having arrived at the wrong address after midnight, shot and killed the armed owner who came out to his driveway bc he thought he heard a prowler.

Infuriating.
media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/f…
*without warning
It's after midnight. You hear something weird outside. Maybe a prowler. You grab your lawfully-owned gun. Open the garage. Walk out. You're peering around twenty seconds. All is quie—BLAM

Officer shoots you without warning.

11th Cir.: seems reasonable to us
Read 6 tweets
Feb 1
Exactly. There's just no upside to going scorched earth over this SCOTUS seat and a LOT of opportunity for reputational peril.
Part of this is people throwing grenades to settle scores over judges from the last time they were throwing grenades over judges.

Just be cool, folks.
In the immortal words of Agent J, "don't start nothin', won't be nothin'.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 16
He took hostages at a synagogue on a Saturday. Pretty sure this act of terrorism was targeted at the Jewish community, champ.
fuckssakes
Sure, folks. When the guy whose demands weren't about Jews forced his Jewish hostages in a synagogue to call a rabbi in another state, it totally wasn't about Jews. That was just a coincidence. Coulda been calling anybody, really.
Read 9 tweets
Jan 15
Absolutely, hands down, no contest, the best uniforms to this day.
I was a high school marching band geek, and we got uniforms when I was a senior where the tunic was fastened diagonally like the Star Trek tunics, and let me tell you it was really satisfying to pull that sucker open and breath. Those were the best.
One of the many great things about this film is that half the men have bangs.

I'm not sure how I ended up on a Wrath rewatch tonight, but here we are.
Read 10 tweets
Jan 14
Big SCOTUS news. The court has agreed to hear the case of a high school football coach who was disciplined for praying at the fifty yard-line after games. supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/21/2… Image
9th Cir. held that when he "kneeled and prayed on the fifty-yard line immediately after games while in views of students and parents, he spoke as a public employee, not as a private citizen," and so was not protected by the First Amendment. cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opin…
That provoked a HEATED exchange of views when the court denied rehearing en banc. cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opin… Image
Read 4 tweets
Jan 13
SCOTUS will block the OSHA test-or-vaccine mandate.

Per curiam opinion.
Justices Gorsuch, Thomas, and Alito concurring.
Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan in dissent. supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf…
SCOTUS will *not* block the CMS mandate. That can go into effect.

Per curiam opinion.
Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, Alito, Barrett in dissent. supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf…
Let's dig in. Here's the nut of the NFIB/OSHA test-or-vaccine maj. op.

"Although COVID– 19 is a risk that occurs in many workplaces, it is not an *occupational* hazard in most."
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(