Blaming diversion schemes & reduced arrests for cannabis possession for increased hospital admissions linked to cannabis is against evidence and plain wrong.
Claiming reduction in possession charges thru diversion led to more psychosis is nonsensical.
Reducing criminal justice involvement opens up space for a public health response. Less ppl in jail and more receiving treatment if needed is a sign of progress, not of regression.
A 2018 study w 180,000 ppl found weak evidence of a causal link from cann use to schizophrenia, & much stronger evidence for a link from schizophrenia to cann use.
Ppl w schizophrenia have a higher chance of using cannabis, NOT other way
Cannabis regulation creates age controls to stop <18s from buying it anywhere.
Canadian research also shows legalisation DIDN’T increase youth prevalence in many nations, & that cann may be one of many factors leading to psychosis:
More people seeking treatment for psychosis & schizophrenia is not bc of diversion. It’s because of no control over cannabis potency brought about by iron law of prohibition:
The stronger the criminal repression of drugs, the stronger the drugs get.
.@WestMidsPCC announces proposals to reduce drug harms, including:
- Offering education/treatment instead of criminalisation to people who use drugs
- Increasing access to overdose-reversing med naloxone
- Considering the intro of drug consumption rooms
.@WestMidsPCC: “By 2020, I hope many of these proposals are in place and having an effect – reducing crime, but also the suffering of those addicted to drugs. These proposals will save the public sector money by reducing the strain on services” theguardian.com/politics/2018/…
Diversion schemes for possession of drugs have been successfully implemented by both Durham and Bristol police forces, with both areas reporting reduced reoffending for people who are diverted away from the criminal justice system. vice.com/en_uk/article/…