Ian Mitchell Profile picture
Feb 11 6 tweets 3 min read
The EU is planning a tax on African carbon with its Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (C-BAM)

Our new analysis shows material -ve impacts on some African economies.

@SPleeck, Fatima Denton @UNUINRA, and I analyse impacts and implications for #EUAUSummit.

Thread:
1. The EU’s C-BAM should reduce Greenhouse Gas emissions by preventing ‘leakage’ to places without carbon pricing. The most-affected imports are from middle-income countries inc China, Russia

But the impact for some African economies will be very significant
2. The worst-affected is Mozambique via its aluminium exports.

It’s plausible C-BAM could reduce Mozambique's GDP by over 1 per cent.

The EU recognises that Mauritania, Sierra Leone and Senegal will also be negatively affected. Algeria and Egypt too.
3. Some have argued @SamuelMarcLowe @CER_EU for an exemption from the carbon import tax for Least Developed Countries (LDCs).

We’re sympathetic, but that would create unhelpful incentives to relocate dirty industry...
4. The European Parliament has called on @EU_Commission to reallocate C-BAM revenues to LDCs.

Good principle but too small: the EU’s wider finance to Africa is lacking - just 19% of the total.

We argue Africa should expect at least 33% (would still lag the UK and US).
5. At the #EUAUSummit next week; we argue

@_AfricanUnion should not seek C-BAM exemption

@EU_Partnerships should increase Africa finance to a third of total + technical support on carbon pricing + monitor impacts

Full analysis and blog here:
cgdev.org/blog/eu-tax-af…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ian Mitchell

Ian Mitchell Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EconMitch

Jun 8, 2021
With the UK's aid commitment being debated a commonly-cited argument (inc by @BBCNews) against it is

"A household that is having to borrow every year wouldn’t give to charity: it should pay off its own debts first”

Four reasons this analogy is wrong and the counter-arguments:
First, the Government isn’t a household - it won’t die, or retire, so the imperative to pay off debt isn’t the same. Indeed, as this @ICAEW chart shows, every G7 economy is in debt, the UK not particularly so.
Second, the assertion ignores assets - using the logic of the original statement, no household with a mortgage would give to charity until it was paid off. This is clearly not the case. In the UK's case, Govt. assets include our reputation & institutions (Parliament, BoE etc).
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(